full text version
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

34
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 418
Author(s):  
Yun Jin Kim ◽  
Linchao Qian ◽  
Muhammad Shahzad Aslam

Background: There has been an increasing trend in Clinacanthus nutans’ research, an important medicinal herb of Malaysia and Thailand, well known as an anti-viral, anti-cancer, and insect bite treatment. This study examines the trend in Clinacanthus nutans’ research from 2000 to 2019 and compares the contribution of research on this topic from different institutions and authors. Methods: Publications from the Scopus database were retrieved using keywords and identify top ten institutions/universities, list of prominent authors, top ten  journals that published research, top five influential articles, top fifty cited papers, and global distribution of publications on Clinacanthus nutans. Microsoft Excel 2016, Wordcloud, SPSS version 26, and GunnMap 2 were used to analyse indicators. A total of 167 articles were identified from the Scopus database. All research publications were screened initially. Five articles (n=5) were removed due to the unavailability of the full-text version of the article. 162 articles were included in the final study. Results: Universiti Putra Malaysia and the Journal of Ethnopharmacology published the highest number of articles on Clinacanthus nutans. Herpes, antioxidant, phenolic, flavonoids, cancer, antimicrobial were common keywords identified using a word cloud. Over the past 20 years, the literature on Clinacanthus nutans has continuously grown, with the rate increasing after 2012. Conclusion: The prominent research on Clinacanthus nutans was based upon their identified and isolated bioactive constituents, and there is a need for more research on clinical trials.



2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Asmadi Hassan ◽  
Geetha Govindasamy

The abstract is not available. To access, please order the printed version or browse the full-text version of this article.



2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (25) ◽  
pp. 148-155
Author(s):  
Marina V. Cherkunova ◽  

This paper investigates the category of expressivity in contemporary English scientific discourse. In particular, metatexts representing scientific articles in the international citations databases, namely Scopus and WoS, are analyzed. The aforesaid metatexts, including the title of the publication and the abstract to it, are treated as secondary small format units which represent a complete semantic replica of the original full-text version of the article retaining its basic functional and pragmatic characteristics. Objectivity, clarity of expression and lack of subjective modality are traditionally perceived as the key features of written scientific communication. At the same time, the argumentative nature of scientific discourse is supposed to bring about the language means of expressing one’s personal position and affecting the addressee. Thus, this paper aims to elicit the expressive means typical of scientific small format metatexts, and to shape them into an expressivity matrix. With the help of stylistic and discourse analysis, the expressive means ofdifferent linguistic layers are selected. Further on, due to the quantitative analysis the hierarchy of expressive means is determined on all the levels of the language system. In the final stage of the analysis the data is systematized into a matrix of scientific metatexts expressivity means. The acquired data prompt a conclusion that the scientific metatexts are characterized by a specific system of linguistic expressive means. The central position in this system is occupied by the lexical means, mainly by the evaluative adjectives. The second place is taken by the tropes, especially metaphor. The means of expressive syntax are on the periphery of the expressivity matrix, as well as the expressive means of the graphical character. The acquired results contribute to the understanding of the dynamic processes that the category of expressivity is undergoing in the contemporary scientific discourse; also they can be of practical use for those intending to publish their scientific works in the international high-rating scientific editions.



2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37
Author(s):  
Christine Bylund

See full-text version



2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-144
Author(s):  
Ana Cristina Santos

See full-text version



2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-30
Author(s):  
Ann-Sofie Lönngren

See full-text version



2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-126
Author(s):  
Ingrid Ryberg

See full-text version



2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-97
Author(s):  
Ayosxa Tudor

See full-text version



2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-165
Author(s):  
Elia A.G. Arfini

See full-text version



2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-91
Author(s):  
Mark Graham

See full-text version



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document