First multicenter experience using the Silk Vista flow diverter in 60 consecutive intracranial aneurysms: technical aspects

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the technical success and procedural safety of the new Silk Vista device (SV) by evaluating the intraprocedural and periprocedural complication rate after its use in several institutions worldwide.MethodsThe study involved a retrospective review of multicenter data regarding a consecutive series of patients with intracranial aneurysms, treated with the SV between September 2020 and January 2021. Clinical, intra/periprocedural and angiographic data, including approach, materials used, aneurysm size and location, device/s, technical details and initial angiographic aneurysm occlusion, were analyzed.Results60 aneurysms were treated with SV in 57 procedures. 66 devices were used, 3 removed and 63 implanted. The devices opened instantaneously in 60 out of 66 (91%) cases and complete wall apposition was achieved in 58 out of 63 (92%) devices implanted. In 4 out of 66 (6%) devices a partial opening of the distal end occurred, and in 5 (8%) devices incomplete apposition was reported. There were 3 (5%) intraprocedural thromboembolic events managed successfully with no permanent neurological morbidity, and 4 (7%) postprocedural events. There was no mortality in this study. The initial occlusion rates in the 60 aneurysms were as follows: O’Kelly–Marotta (OKM) A in 34 (57%) cases, OKM B in 15 (25%) cases, OKM C in 6 (10%) cases, and OKM D in 5 (8%) cases.ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that the use of the new flow diverter Silk Vista for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms is feasible and technically safe.

Bench-Top Comparison of Three Different Types of Stents Used for Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis

Purpose: Four key bench-top tests, including trackability, conformability, wall-apposition, and bending stiffness, were performed to understand the mechanical characteristics in 3 different types of stents applicable for treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: Balloon-expandable D⁺Storm, Pro-Kinetic Energy, and self-expandable Wingspan stents.Materials and Methods: Trackability was assessed by measuring the tracking forces of each stent with its delivery systems. Conformability and wall apposition were quantified and analyzed using curved vessel models. A 3-point bending test was employed to evaluate bending stiffness.Results: D⁺Storm showed the lowest tracking forces while the conformability of the Wingspan stent was superior to that of the tested stents. Pro-Kinetic Energy and D⁺Storm had better wall apposition in curved vessels than the Wingspan stent. Bending stiffness of the Wingspan stent was notably lower, whereas no significant differences were found between D⁺Storm and Energy. Pro-Kinetic Energy and D⁺Storm not only indicated lower gap ratios between the struts and the vessel wall but also maintained good wall apposition even in the curved model.Conclusion: These bench-top measurements may provide clinicians with useful information in regard to selecting suitable stents for treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.

Use of shockwave intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of calcified renal artery stenosis in a symptomatic subject

Aim: The use of shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of heavily calcified atherosclerotic plaques before stenting showed great results in terms of feasibility and safety with favorable initial success. Evidence suggests that it is a useful tool to treat calcified lesions in peripheral and coronary arteries. Here, we describe the case of a patient with calcified renal artery stenosis successfully treated with the shockwave lithotripsy system. Case Report: We present a 76-year-old man with a known significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and refractory hypertension. The patient received an angioplasty of the right renal artery in the first session and he was admitted for a second session to intervene in the left renal artery. The lesion was successfully treated with the lithotripsy system. Final angiography demonstrated an excellent position of the stent and good wall apposition. Conclusion: Our clinical case demonstrates that lithotripsy is safe and effective also for the treatment of the renal artery.

Optimum concentration of iodine contrast agent injection for best stent visualization using Neuroform Atlas stent during stent-assisted coil embolization: Case reviews based on in vitro experiments

Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of contrast agent concentration (Conc) on the visibility of Neuroform Atlas in vitro and in clinical cases. Methods: A plastic tube was filled with several Conc. in saline (experiment 1) and blood (experiment 2). Thereafter, the Neuroform Atlas was placed around the plastic tube in an acrylic shield case. In experiment 3, the Neuroform Atlas was placed in the internal carotid artery of the endo vascular evaluator endovascular training system with an injection of several Conc in saline. Five slices of the axial images obtained using the 3D-cone-beam computed tomography (3D-CBCT) with the digital subtraction angiography system were evaluated. A 1-cm2 circular center, which showed the contrast agent in saline or blood, was determined as the region of interest, and its pixels were evaluated. Results: Radiation density (Rd) was directly proportional to the contrast agent in saline and blood (experiment 1: (Rd (pixel)) = 6.8495 × (concentration (%)) + 152.72 (R2 = 0.99), experiment 2: (Rd (pixel)) = 6.2485 × (concentration (%)) + 167.42 (R2 = 0.9966), experiment 3: (Rd (pixel)) = 10.287 × (concentration (%)) + 108.26 (R2 = 0.993)]. Rd calculated similarly in our cases (concentration varied from 5% to 8%) was between the range of “Rd of experiment 2” and “Rd of experiment 3.” Conclusion: Based on our in vitro experiments, with 5–8% concentration, Neuroform Atlas stent deployment with complete neck coverage by the bulging stent and wall apposition was visualized on 3D-CBCT.

Promoting endothelialization of flow-diverting stents: a review

Intracranial flow-diverting (FD) stents have revolutionized the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in recent years, but complications resulting from failed endothelialization can still occur. Approaches to promote endothelialization are understudied, but hold promise in mitigating both short- and long-term complications associated with FD stent insertion. The aim of this review is to highlight the various features of and modifications that have been made to FD stents in order to expedite endothelialization. More specifically, we focus on how endothelialization can be influenced by the stent design, wall apposition, surface modifications, and the inclusion of biological agents.

Virtual simulation with Sim&Size software for Pipeline Flex Embolization: evaluation of the technical and clinical impact

IntroductionDuring flow diversion, the choice of the length, diameter, and location of the deployed stent are critical for the success of the procedure. Sim&Size software, based on the three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) acquisition, simulates the release of the stent, suggesting optimal sizing, and displaying the degree of the wall apposition.ObjectiveTo demonstrate technical and clinical impacts of the Sim&Size simulation during treatment with the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent aneurysm embolization with Pipeline at our department were retrospectively enrolled (January 2015–December 2017) and divided into two groups: treated with and without simulation. Through univariate and multivariate models, we evaluated: (1) rate of corrective intervention for non-optimal stent placement, (2) duration of intervention, (3) radiation dose, and (4) stent length.Results189 patients, 95 (50.2%) without and 94 (49.7%) with software assistance were analyzed. Age, sex, comorbidities, aneurysm characteristics, and operator’s experience were comparable among the two groups. Procedures performed with the software had a lower rate of corrective intervention (9% vs 20%, p=0.036), a shorter intervention duration (46 min vs 52 min, p=0.002), a lower median radiation dose (1150 mGy vs 1558 mGy, p<0.001), and a shorter stent length (14 mm vs 16 mm, p<0.001).ConclusionsIn our experience, the use of the virtual simulation during Pipeline treatment significantly reduced the need for corrective intervention, the procedural time, the radiation dose, and the length of the stent.

Filament inadequate wall apposition of the different ends of flow diverters in the abdominal aorta of rabbits

Background Flow diverters (FDs) with flared ends (FEs) or straight ends (SEs) are used either alone or when overlapped to treat complex intracranial aneurysms. We evaluated filament inadequate wall apposition (IWA) of the FEs and SEs of FDs in vivo. Methods A total of 24 FDs with FEs and SEs were placed in an overlapping manner in the abdominal aortae of six rabbits (two sets per rabbit). Digital subtraction angiography was performed immediately after stent insertion and three months later. The anatomical and histopathological aortic features at FEs and SEs were evaluated. Results Angiography revealed no significant difference in terms of changes in arterial diameter between the FE and SE groups ( p = 0.877). Gross anatomical evaluation revealed IWA of the different ends of FDs but no thrombi or bleeding, showing that the metallic filaments were not in touch with the vessel wall and nor had they penetrated the vessel wall. The filaments’ IWA rates of FEs and SEs were 8.33% and 8.85%, respectively. The IWA rate at overlapping ends was lower than that at non-overlapping ends. The maximum neo-intimal thickness at FEs was greater than that at SEs (149.4 ± 48.9 and 98.6 ± 26.6 µm, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions Both the FEs and SEs of FDs can exhibit IMA. IWA events are reduced at the overlapped regions. On pathological evaluation, FEs increased neo-intimal thicknesses more than SEs did, but hyperplasia was minimal on angiography.

Balloon-Mounted Stents for Treatment of Refractory Flow Diverting Device Wall Malapposition

BACKGROUND As indications for flow diversion (FD) have expanded, new challenges in deployment of flow diverting devices (FDDs) have been encountered. We present 4 cases with aneurysms in which deployment of FDDs were complicated by device malapposition and compromised opening in regions of parent vessel stenosis. In all 4 cases, a balloon-mounted stent was ultimately deployed within the FDD. OBJECTIVE To describe the use of balloon-mounted stents (BMS) within FDDs for correction of flow-limiting stenosis and device malapposition. METHODS Patients undergoing FD for treatment of aneurysms complicated by refractory flow-limiting stenosis were identified through multi-center retrospective review. Those cases requiring use of BMS were identified. Further investigation in one of the cases was performed with a simulated pulsatile blood flow model. RESULTS After attempts to perform balloon angioplasty proved unsuccessful, BMS deployment successfully opened the stenotic parent artery and improved FDD wall apposition in all 4 cases. Simulated pulsatile blood flow modeling confirmed improvements in the distribution of velocity, wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, and flow pattern structure after stent deployment. One case was complicated by asymptomatic in-stent thrombosis. CONCLUSION In cases of FDD deployment complicated by flow-limiting stenosis refractory to conventional techniques, a BMS deployed within the FD can provide radial support to open both the stenotic device and parent artery. Resulting improvements in device wall apposition may portend greater long-term efficacy of FD. In-stent occlusion can occur and may reflect a thrombogenic interaction between the devices.