Virtual simulation with Sim&Size software for Pipeline Flex Embolization: evaluation of the technical and clinical impact

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 968-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Piergallini ◽  
Federico Cagnazzo ◽  
Giorgio Conte ◽  
Cyril Dargazanli ◽  
Imad Derraz ◽  
...  

IntroductionDuring flow diversion, the choice of the length, diameter, and location of the deployed stent are critical for the success of the procedure. Sim&Size software, based on the three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) acquisition, simulates the release of the stent, suggesting optimal sizing, and displaying the degree of the wall apposition.ObjectiveTo demonstrate technical and clinical impacts of the Sim&Size simulation during treatment with the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent aneurysm embolization with Pipeline at our department were retrospectively enrolled (January 2015–December 2017) and divided into two groups: treated with and without simulation. Through univariate and multivariate models, we evaluated: (1) rate of corrective intervention for non-optimal stent placement, (2) duration of intervention, (3) radiation dose, and (4) stent length.Results189 patients, 95 (50.2%) without and 94 (49.7%) with software assistance were analyzed. Age, sex, comorbidities, aneurysm characteristics, and operator’s experience were comparable among the two groups. Procedures performed with the software had a lower rate of corrective intervention (9% vs 20%, p=0.036), a shorter intervention duration (46 min vs 52 min, p=0.002), a lower median radiation dose (1150 mGy vs 1558 mGy, p<0.001), and a shorter stent length (14 mm vs 16 mm, p<0.001).ConclusionsIn our experience, the use of the virtual simulation during Pipeline treatment significantly reduced the need for corrective intervention, the procedural time, the radiation dose, and the length of the stent.

EP Europace ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-Y. Wielandts ◽  
S. De Buck ◽  
J. Ector ◽  
A. LaGerche ◽  
R. Willems ◽  
...  

EP Europace ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1718-1724 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. De Buck ◽  
B. S. N. Alzand ◽  
J.-Y. Wielandts ◽  
C. Garweg ◽  
T. Phlips ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Rose-Felker ◽  
Joshua D. Robinson ◽  
Carl L. Backer ◽  
Cynthia K. Rigsby ◽  
Osama M. Eltayeb ◽  
...  

Background: Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and echocardiography (echo) are used preoperatively in coarctation of the aorta to define arch hypoplasia and great vessel branching. We sought to determine differences in quantitative measurements, as well as surgical utility, between modalities. Methods: Infants (less than six months) with both CTA and echo prior to coarctation repair from 2004 to 2013 were included. Measurements were compared and correlated with surgical approach. Three surgeons reviewed de-identified images to predict approach and characterize utility. Computed tomographic angiography radiation dose was calculated. Results: Thirty-three patients were included. No differences existed in arch measurements between echo and CTA ( z-score: −2.59 vs −2.43; P = .47). No differences between modalities were seen for thoracotomy ( z-score: −2.48 [echo] vs −2.31 [CTA]; P = .48) or sternotomy ( z-score: −3.13 [echo] vs −3.08 [CTA]; P = .84). Computed tomographic angiography delineated great vessel branching pattern in two patients with equivocal echo findings ( P = .60). Surgeons rated CTA as far more useful than echo in understanding arch hypoplasia and great vessel branching in cases where CTA was done to resolve anatomical questions that remain after echo evaluation. Two of three surgeons were more likely to choose the surgical approach taken based on CTA (surgeon A, P = .02; surgeon B, P = .01). Radiation dose averaged 2.5 (1.6) mSv and trended down from 2.9 mSv (1.8 mSv; n = 20) to 1.6 mSv (0.5 mSv; n = 7) ( P = .06) with new technology. Conclusion: Although CTA and echo measurements of the aorta do not differ, CTA better delineates branching and surgeons strongly prefer it for three-dimensional arch anatomy. We recommend CTA for patients with anomalous arch branching patterns, diffuse or complex hypoplasia, or unusual arch morphology not fully elucidated by echo.


Heart Rhythm ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael V. Orlov ◽  
Peter Hoffmeister ◽  
G. Muqtada Chaudhry ◽  
Ibrahim Almasry ◽  
Geert H.M. Gijsbers ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 176 (3) ◽  
pp. 1318-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariam Samim ◽  
Pierfrancesco Agostoni ◽  
Freek Nijhoff ◽  
Ricardo P.J. Budde ◽  
Alferso C. Abrahams ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document