Influence of heart rate correction formulas on QTc interval stability

Monitoring of QTc interval is mandated in different clinical conditions. Nevertheless, intra-subject variability of QTc intervals reduces the clinical utility of QTc monitoring strategies. Since this variability is partly related to QT heart rate correction, 10 different heart rate corrections (Bazett, Fridericia, Dmitrienko, Framingham, Schlamowitz, Hodges, Ashman, Rautaharju, Sarma, and Rabkin) were applied to 452,440 ECG measurements made in 539 healthy volunteers (259 females, mean age 33.3 ± 8.4 years). For each correction formula, the short term (5-min time-points) and long-term (day-time hours) variability of rate corrected QT values (QTc) was investigated together with the comparisons of the QTc values with individually corrected QTcI values obtained by subject-specific modelling of the QT/RR relationship and hysteresis. The results showed that (a) both in terms of short-term and long-term QTc variability, Bazett correction led to QTc values that were more variable than the results of other corrections (p < 0.00001 for all), (b) the QTc variability by Fridericia and Framingham corrections were not systematically different from each other but were lower than the results of other corrections (p-value between 0.033 and < 0.00001), and (c) on average, Bazett QTc values departed from QTcI intervals more than the QTc values of other corrections. The study concludes that (a) previous suggestions that Bazett correction should no longer be used in clinical practice are fully justified, (b) replacing Bazett correction with Fridericia and/or Framingham corrections would improve clinical QTc monitoring, (c) heart rate stability is needed for valid QTc assessment, and (d) development of further QTc corrections for day-to-day use is not warranted.

Heart Rate Dependency and Inter-Lead Variability of the T Peak – T End Intervals

The electrocardiographic (ECG) assessment of the T peak–T end (Tpe) intervals has been used in many clinical studies, but several related physiological aspects have not been reported. Specifically, the sources of the Tpe differences between different ECG leads have not been systematically researched, the relationship of Tpe duration to underlying heart rate has not been firmly established, and little is known about the mutual correspondence of Tpe intervals measured in different ECG leads. This study evaluated 796,620 10-s 12-lead ECGs obtained from long-term Holters recorded in 639 healthy subjects (311 female) aged 33.8 ± 9.4 years. For each ECG, transformation to orthogonal XYZ lead was used to measure Tpe in the orthogonal vector magnitude (used as a reference for lead-to-lead comparisons) and to construct a three-dimensional T wave loop. The loop roundness was expressed by a ratio between its circumference and length. These ratios were significantly related to the standard deviation of Tpe durations in different ECG leads. At the underlying heart rate of 60 beats per minute, Tpe intervals were shorter in female than in male individuals (82.5 ± 5.6 vs 90.0 ± 6.5 ms, p &lt; 0.0001). When studying linear slopes between Tpe intervals measured in different leads and the underlying heart rate, we found only minimal heart rate dependency, which was not systematic across the ECG leads and/or across the population. For any ECG lead, positive Tpe/RR slope was found in some subjects (e.g., 79 and 25% of subjects for V2 and V4 measurements, respectively) and a negative Tpe/RR slope in other subjects (e.g., 40 and 65% for V6 and V5, respectively). The steepest positive and negative Tpe/RR slopes were found for measurements in lead V2 and V4, respectively. In all leads, the Tpe/RR slope values were close to zero, indicating, on average, Tpe changes well below 2 ms for RR interval changes of 100 ms. On average, longest Tpe intervals were measured in lead V2, the shortest in lead III. The study concludes that the Tpe intervals measured in different leads cannot be combined. Irrespective of the measured ECG lead, the Tpe interval is not systematically heart rate dependent, and no heart rate correction should be used in clinical Tpe investigations.

Heart Rate Correction of the J-to-Tpeak Interval

Drug-induced changes of the J to T peak (JTp) and J to the median of area under the T wave (JT50) were reported to differentiate QT prolonging drugs that are predominant blockers of the delayed potassium rectifier current from those with multiple ion channel effects. Studies of drug-induced JTp/JT50 interval changes might therefore facilitate cardiac safety evaluation of new pharmaceuticals. It is not known whether formulas for QT heart rate correction are applicable to JTp and JT50 intervals. QT/RR, JTp/RR, and JT50/RR profiles were studied in 523 healthy subjects aged 33.5 ± 8.4 years (254 females). In individual subjects, 1,256 ± 220 electrocardiographic measurements of QT, JTp, and JT50 intervals were available including a 5-minute history of RR intervals preceding each measurement. Curvilinear, linear and log-linear regression models were used to characterize individual QT/RR, JTp/RR, and JT50/RR profiles both without and with correction for heart rate hysteresis. JTp/RR and JT50/RR hysteresis correction needs to be included but the generic universal correction for QT/RR hysteresis is also applicable to JTp/RR and JT50/RR profiles. Once this is incorporated, median regression coefficients of the investigated population suggest linear correction formulas JTpc = JTp + 0.150(1-RR) and JT50c = JT50 + 0.117(1-RR) where RR intervals of the underlying heart rate are hysteresis-corrected, and all measurements expressed in seconds. The established correction formulas can be proposed for future clinical pharmacology studies that show drug-induced heart rate changes of up to approximately 10 beats per minute.