Use of mechanical pulmonary reperfusion and fibrinolysis in acute massive pulmonary embolism requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objectives The optimal pulmonary revascularization strategy in acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) requiring the implantation extra corporeal membrane oxygenation remains controversial, and data are sparse. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available evidence regarding the use of mechanical reperfusion (i.e. surgical or catheter-based embolectomy) and fibrinolytic strategies (i.e. systemic fibrinolysis, catheter-directed fibrinolysis, or as stand-alone therapy) in terms of mortality and bleeding outcomes. Results The literature search identified 835 studies, 17 of which were included or a total of 321 PE patients with ECMO. In total, 31.1% were treated with mechanical pulmonary reperfusion, while 78.9% received fibrinolytic strategies. The mortality rate was 23.0% in the mechanical reperfusion group and 43.1% in the fibrinolysis group (Figure). The pooled OR for mortality with mechanical reperfusion was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.213–0.997; I2=28.3%) versus fibrinolysis. The rate of bleeding in PE patients under ECMO was 29.1% in the mechanical reperfusion group and 26.0% in the fibrinolytic reperfusion (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.46–2.54; I2=0.0%) among 10 eligible studies with available bleeding data. The meta-regression model did not identify any relationship between the covariates “more than one pulmonary reperfusion therapy” and “ECMO implantation before pulmonary reperfusion therapy”, and outcomes. Conclusions The results of the present meta-analysis and meta-regression suggest that surgical embolectomy yields the best results, regardless of the timing of VA-ECMO implantation in the reperfusion timeline, and regardless of whether fibrinolysis has been administered or not. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Surgical Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism and Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

: Venous thromboembolism clinically presents as deep venous thrombosis or acute pulmonary embolism and is globally recognized as the third most frequent acute cardiovascular syndrome after myocardial infarction and stroke. Although pulmonary embolism does not typically cause severe pulmonary hypertension in the acute setting, thrombus organization and fibrosis can lead to stenosis or obliteration of pulmonary arteries in a minority of patients, which in turn result in severe pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure. This disease is labeled chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and can occur after a single episode or multiple ones of pulmonary embolism. The cornerstone of pulmonary embolism treatment is medical therapy, whereas systemic thrombolytic therapy has to be considered for patients with hemodynamic instability. Given the current acceptable short-term surgical mortality, the potential of first-line surgical embolectomy as an alternative to medical thrombolysis has gained momentum as far as pulmonary embolism treatment is concerned. In contrast to pulmonary embolism, bilateral complete pulmonary endarterectomy under short deep hypothermic circulatory arrest intervals is the treatment of choice against chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, given patients’ operability. Pulmonary endarterectomy is suggested in every operable patient when the operation is offered by an experienced multidisciplinary team, including at least one experienced surgeon. Surgical embolectomy should also be limited to large institutions since it also requires an experienced heart team. This review concerns a thorough discussion regarding surgical treatment of pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eligibility criteria, operation-related complications and postoperative outcomes are discussed in detail.

838 Pulmonary Embolectomy: Techniques and Outcomes from The Literature

Aim Pulmonary embolectomy involves the surgical removal of a thrombus from the pulmonary tree, with the most popular approaches being surgical embolectomy (SE), percutaneous pulmonary embolectomy (PPE) and minimally invasive thoracotomy (MIT). The latter two new techniques are gradually increasing in popularity in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) due to reduced recovery times. This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of the three aforementioned techniques in the treatment of acute PE. Method A literature review was performed with PUBMED to identify studies reporting these interventions. 79 papers were included, involving a total of 2445 patients. Patients’ baseline characteristics and perioperative status, inpatient mortality rates and complication rates of each intervention group were individually assessed and compared. Results Among all three interventions, SE studies demonstrated the highest in-patient mortality rate (20.8%). Patients receiving SE are also more likely to have pulmonary (2.8%) and other postoperative bleeding (7.4%). PPE patients are more likely to develop gastrointestinal bleeding and surgical site complications (4%). Scatter graph of the SE studies showed a declining trend of mortality rate over time (R²=0.50). Conclusions All three methods are effective in treating acute PE, while SE showed a trend of decreasing mortality over time. Further research on PPE and MIT is needed to define its place in the treatment of acute PE.

Intrapulmonary Artery Thrombolysis in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Case Series from King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital Experience

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition. In patient who has contraindication for systemic thrombolysis and inappropriate for surgical embolectomy, there is a role of catheter interventions. However, the data are limited. The aim of the present report was to assess a role of intrapulmonary artery thrombolysis bolus in acute PE. A retrospective review of the use of intrapulmonary artery thrombolysis in acute PE. The data were collected from 14 patients with massive or submassive PE who had contraindication or inappropriate for systemic thrombolysis and unsuitable for surgical embolectomy. After intrapulmonary thrombolysis was given, patients were followed clinically and hemodynamically until discharged and after 1 month. Pulmonary pressure was collected at pre and post intervention. Of the 14 patients (age 59±19 years, 78.6% female), 86% were diagnosed as submassive PE. Mean dose of tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) was 28±14 mg given as bolus and continuous infusion (19±10 hours). One patient died after completion of intrapulmonary infusion rt-PA at day 90, which did not relate to PE and the treatment. After intervention, mean PA pressure was significantly reduced from 32.3±6.0 to 21.0±4.3 mmHg (p<0.001). Three patients (21%) had minor bleeding (hematoma at access site). The present case series showed that intrapulmonary infusion of rt-PA was effective and safe in patient with massive and submassive PE who had contraindication or inappropriate to systemic thrombolysis or inoperable surgical thrombectomy. Keywords: Acute pulmonary embolism; Intrapulmonary thrombolysis; Tissue plasminogen activator; Surgical thrombectomy

Clinical outcomes of surgical embolectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia: a nationwide cohort study

In Taiwan, the outcomes of acute limb ischemia have yet to be investigated in a standardized manner. In this study, we compared the safety, feasibility and outcomes of acute limb ischemia after surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed therapy in Taiwan. This study used data collected from the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Database (NHID) and Cause of Death Data between the years 2000 and 2015. The rate ratio of all-cause in-hospital mortality and risk of amputation during the same period of hospital stay were estimated using Generalized linear models (GLM). There was no significant difference in mortality risk between CDT and surgical intervention (9.5% vs. 10.68%, adjusted rate ratio (95% CI): regression 1.0 [0.79–1.27], PS matching 0.92 [0.69–1.23]). The risk of amputation was also comparable between the two groups. (13.59% vs. 14.81%, adjusted rate ratio (95% CI): regression 0.84 [0.68–1.02], PS matching 0.92 [0.72–1.17]). Age (p < 0.001) and liver disease (p = 0.01) were associated with higher mortality risks. Heart failure (p = 0.03) and chronic or end-stage renal disease (p = 0.03) were associated with higher amputation risks. Prior antithrombotic agent use (p = 0.03) was associated with a reduced risk of amputation. Both surgical intervention and CDT are effective and feasible procedures for patients with ALI in Taiwan.