Evaluation of Grade Crossing Hazard Ranking Models

Public agencies involved with highway-railroad grade crossing safety must allocate available funding to projects which are considered the most in need for improvements. Mathematical models provide a ranking of hazard risk at crossings and support the project selection process. This paper reports the results of a research study sponsored by the Ohio Rail Development Commission (ORDC) and the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) examining hazard ranking models for grade crossing project selection. The goal of the research was to provide ORDC, ODOT, and other stakeholders with a better understanding of the grade crossing hazard ranking formulas and other methods used by States to evaluate grade crossing hazards and select locations for hazard elimination projects. A comprehensive literature review along with personal interviews of state DOT personnel from eight states yielded best practices for hazard ranking and project selection. The literature review found that more than three-quarters of states utilize some type of hazard ranking formula or other systematic method for project prioritization. The most commonly-used hazard ranking model in use is the U.S. DOT Accident Prediction Model; however, at least eleven states utilize state-specific hazard ranking models. Detailed evaluation of several different hazard ranking models determined that the existing hazard ranking model used in Ohio, the U.S. DOT Accident Prediction Model, should continue to be used. The research also recommends greater use of sight distance information at crossings and expanding the preliminary list of crossings to be considered in the annual program as enhancements to the existing project selection process used by the ORDC and ODOT.

Current Issues in Highway–Rail Grade Crossing Hazard-Ranking and Project Development

This paper reports on a comprehensive research study of hazard-ranking models for prioritization and selection of highway–rail grade crossing improvement projects. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) accident prediction model is the most commonly used hazard-ranking model, although 11 states use state-specific models. Key variables not included in the U.S. DOT model but included in state-specific models may provide useful insight for identifying hazardous crossing locations. Emerging issues, such as the crash modeling approach used by the U.S. DOT model and the application of economic analysis principles in project prioritization, are also discussed. The findings reported in this paper provide a starting point for a broader discussion among all stakeholders in the grade crossing safety community about ways to improve hazard-ranking and project selection for highway–rail grade crossing investments.