crossflow ultrafiltration
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

42
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
pp. 119289
Author(s):  
Maksym Loginov ◽  
Floriane Doudiès ◽  
Nicolas Hengl ◽  
Mohamed Karrouch ◽  
Nadine Leconte ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 618 ◽  
pp. 118700
Author(s):  
Floriane Doudiès ◽  
Maksym Loginov ◽  
Nicolas Hengl ◽  
Mohamed Karrouch ◽  
Nadine Leconte ◽  
...  

Processes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1625
Author(s):  
Maximilian Krippl ◽  
Ignasi Bofarull-Manzano ◽  
Mark Duerkop ◽  
Astrid Dürauer

Ultrafiltration is a powerful method used in virtually every pharmaceutical bioprocess. Depending on the process stage, the product-to-impurity ratio differs. The impact of impurities on the process depends on various factors. Solely mechanistic models are currently not sufficient to entirely describe these complex interactions. We have established two hybrid models for predicting the flux evolution, the protein rejection factor and two components’ concentration during crossflow ultrafiltration. The hybrid models were compared to the standard mechanistic modeling approach based on the stagnant film theory. The hybrid models accurately predicted the flux and concentration over a wide range of process parameters and product-to-impurity ratios based on a minimum set of training experiments. Incorporating both components into the modeling approach was essential to yielding precise results. The stagnant film model exhibited larger errors and no predictions regarding the impurity could be made, since it is based on the main product only. Further, the developed hybrid models exhibit excellent interpolation properties and enable both multi-step ahead flux predictions as well as time-resolved impurity forecasts, which is considered to be a critical quality attribute in many bioprocesses. Therefore, the developed hybrid models present the basis for next generation bioprocessing when implemented as soft sensors for real-time monitoring of processes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. 105451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Palombarini ◽  
Francesca Ghirga ◽  
Alberto Boffi ◽  
Alberto Macone ◽  
Alessandra Bonamore

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 15-27
Author(s):  
Thaksina Poyai ◽  
Phuntharee Khiewpuckdee ◽  
Aunnop Wongrueng ◽  
Pisut Painmanakul ◽  
Nattawin Chawaloesphonsiya

2019 ◽  
Vol 574 ◽  
pp. 65-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alon Y. Kirschner ◽  
Yu-Heng Cheng ◽  
Donald R. Paul ◽  
Robert W. Field ◽  
Benny D. Freeman

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiranjit BHATTACHARJEE ◽  
Vinod Kumar SAXENA ◽  
Suman DUTTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 649-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Furqan Almyahi ◽  
Thomas R Andersen ◽  
Nathan A Cooling ◽  
Natalie P Holmes ◽  
Matthew J Griffith ◽  
...  

In this study we have optimised the preparation conditions for large-volume nanoparticle inks, based on poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT):indene-C60 multiadducts (ICxA), through two purification processes: centrifugal and crossflow ultrafiltration. The impact of purification is twofold: firstly, removal of excess sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) surfactant from the ink and, secondly, concentration of the photoactive components in the ink. The removal of SDS was studied in detail both by a UV–vis spectroscopy-based method and by surface tension measurements of the nanoparticle ink filtrate; revealing that centrifugal ultrafiltration removed SDS at a higher rate than crossflow ultrafiltration even though a similar filter was applied in both cases (10,000 Da M w cut-off). The influence of SDS concentration on the aqueous solar nanoparticle (ASNP) inks was investigated by monitoring the surface morphology/topography of the ASNP films using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and photovoltaic device performance as a function of ultrafiltration (decreasing SDS content). The surface morphology/topography showed, as expected, a decreased number of SDS crystallites on the surface of the ASNP film with increased ultrafiltration steps. The device performance revealed distinct peaks in efficiency with ultrafiltration: centrifuge purified inks reached a maximum efficiency at a dilution factor of 7.8 × 104, while crossflow purified inks did not reach a maximum efficiency until a dilution factor of 6.1 × 109. This difference was ascribed to the different wetting properties of the prepared inks and was further corroborated by surface tension measurements of the ASNP inks which revealed that the peak efficiencies for both methods occurred for similar surface tension values of 48.1 and 48.8 mN m−1. This work demonstrates that addressing the surface tension of large-volume ASNP inks is key to the reproducible fabrication of nanoparticle photovoltaic devices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document