Structure and Topology Prediction of Phage Adhesion Devices Using AlphaFold2: The Case of Two Oenococcus oeni Phages

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are important microorganisms in food fermentation. In the food industry, bacteriophages (phages or bacterial viruses) may cause the disruption of LAB-dependent processes with product inconsistencies and economic losses. LAB phages use diverse adhesion devices to infect their host, yet the overall picture of host-binding mechanisms remains incomplete. Here, we aimed to determine the structure and topology of the adhesion devices of two lytic siphophages, OE33PA and Vinitor162, infecting the wine bacteria Oenococcus oeni. These phages possess adhesion devices with a distinct composition and morphology and likely use different infection mechanisms. We primarily used AlphaFold2, an algorithm that can predict protein structure with unprecedented accuracy, to obtain a 3D model of the adhesion devices’ components. Using our prior knowledge of the architecture of the LAB phage host-binding machineries, we also reconstituted the topology of OE33PA and Vinitor162 adhesion devices. While OE33PA exhibits original structures in the assembly of its bulky adhesion device, Vinitor162 harbors several carbohydrate-binding modules throughout its long and extended adhesion device. Overall, these results highlight the ability of AlphaFold2 to predict protein structures and illustrate its great potential in the study of phage structures and host-binding mechanisms.

Single-sequence protein structure prediction using language models from deep learning

AlphaFold2 and related systems use deep learning to predict protein structure from co-evolutionary relationships encoded in multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). Despite dramatic, recent increases in accuracy, three challenges remain: (i) prediction of orphan and rapidly evolving proteins for which an MSA cannot be generated, (ii) rapid exploration of designed structures, and (iii) understanding the rules governing spontaneous polypeptide folding in solution. Here we report development of an end-to-end differentiable recurrent geometric network (RGN) able to predict protein structure from single protein sequences without use of MSAs. This deep learning system has two novel elements: a protein language model (AminoBERT) that uses a Transformer to learn latent structural information from millions of unaligned proteins and a geometric module that compactly represents Cα backbone geometry. RGN2 outperforms AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold (as well as trRosetta) on orphan proteins and is competitive with designed sequences, while achieving up to a billion-fold reduction in compute time. These findings demonstrate the practical and theoretical strengths of protein language models relative to MSAs in structure prediction.

Selection for cooperativity causes epistasis predominately between native contacts and enables epistasis-based structure reconstruction

Epistasis and cooperativity of folding both result from networks of energetic interactions in proteins. Epistasis results from energetic interactions among mutants, whereas cooperativity results from energetic interactions during folding that reduce the presence of intermediate states. The two concepts seem intuitively related, but it is unknown how they are related, particularly in terms of selection. To investigate their relationship, we simulated protein evolution under selection for cooperativity and separately under selection for epistasis. Strong selection for cooperativity created strong epistasis between contacts in the native structure but weakened epistasis between nonnative contacts. In contrast, selection for epistasis increased epistasis in both native and nonnative contacts and reduced cooperativity. Because epistasis can be used to predict protein structure only if it preferentially occurs in native contacts, this result indicates that selection for cooperativity may be key for predicting structure using epistasis. To evaluate this inference, we simulated the evolution of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (GB1) with and without cooperativity. With cooperativity, strong epistatic interactions clearly map out the native GB1 structure, while allowing the presence of intermediate states (low cooperativity) obscured the structure. This indicates that using epistasis measurements to reconstruct protein structure may be inappropriate for proteins with stable intermediates.

Accurate protein structure prediction with hydroxyl radical protein footprinting data

Hydroxyl radical protein footprinting (HRPF) in combination with mass spectrometry reveals the relative solvent exposure of labeled residues within a protein, thereby providing insight into protein tertiary structure. HRPF labels nineteen residues with varying degrees of reliability and reactivity. Here, we are presenting a dynamics-driven HRPF-guided algorithm for protein structure prediction. In a benchmark test of our algorithm, usage of the dynamics data in a score term resulted in notable improvement of the root-mean-square deviations of the lowest-scoring ab initio models and improved the funnel-like metric Pnear for all benchmark proteins. We identified models with accurate atomic detail for three of the four benchmark proteins. This work suggests that HRPF data along with side chain dynamics sampled by a Rosetta mover ensemble can be used to accurately predict protein structure.

A Review of Protein Structure Prediction using Deep Learning

Proteins are macromolecules composed of 20 types of amino acids in a specific order. Understanding how proteins fold is vital because its 3-dimensional structure determines the function of a protein. Prediction of protein structure based on amino acid strands and evolutionary information becomes the basis for other studies such as predicting the function, property or behaviour of a protein and modifying or designing new proteins to perform certain desired functions. Machine learning advances, particularly deep learning, are igniting a paradigm shift in scientific study. In this review, we summarize recent work in applying deep learning techniques to tackle problems in protein structural prediction. We discuss various deep learning approaches used to predict protein structure and future achievements and challenges. This review is expected to help provide perspectives on problems in biochemistry that can take advantage of the deep learning approach. Some of the unanswered challenges with current computational approaches are predicting the location and precision orientation of protein side chains, predicting protein interactions with DNA, RNA and other small molecules and predicting the structure of protein complexes.

Chasing coevolutionary signals in intrinsically disordered proteins complexes

Intrinsically disordered proteins/regions (IDPs/IDRs) are crucial components of the cell, they are highly abundant and participate ubiquitously in a wide range of biological functions, such as regulatory processes and cell signaling. Many of their important functions rely on protein interactions, by which they trigger or modulate different pathways. Sequence covariation, a powerful tool for protein contact prediction, has been applied successfully to predict protein structure and to identify protein–protein interactions mostly of globular proteins. IDPs/IDRs also mediate a plethora of protein–protein interactions, highlighting the importance of addressing sequence covariation-based inter-protein contact prediction of this class of proteins. Despite their importance, a systematic approach to analyze the covariation phenomena of intrinsically disordered proteins and their complexes is still missing. Here we carry out a comprehensive critical assessment of coevolution-based contact prediction in IDP/IDR complexes and detail the challenges and possible limitations that emerge from their analysis. We found that the coevolutionary signal is faint in most of the complexes of disordered proteins but positively correlates with the interface size and binding affinity between partners. In addition, we discuss the state-of-art methodology by biological interpretation of the results, formulate evaluation guidelines and suggest future directions of development to the field.

Correlating topology and thermodynamics to predict protein structure sensitivity to point mutations

The relation between distribution of hydrophobic amino acids along with protein chains and their structure is far from being completely understood. No reliable method allowsab initioprediction of the folded structure from this distribution of physicochemical properties, even when they are highly degenerated by considering only two classes: hydrophobic and polar. Establishment of long-range hydrophobic three dimension (3D) contacts is essential for the formation of the nucleus, a key process in the early steps of protein folding. Thus, a large number of 3D simulation studies were developed to challenge this issue. They are nowadays evaluated in a specific chapter of the molecular modeling competition, Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction. We present here a simulation of the early steps of the folding process for 850 proteins, performed in a discrete 3D space, which results in peaks in the predicted distribution of intra-chain noncovalent contacts. The residues located at these peak positions tend to be buried in the core of the protein and are expected to correspond to critical positions in the sequence, important both for folding and structural (or similarly, energetic in the thermodynamic hypothesis) stability. The degree of stabilization or destabilization due to a point mutation at the critical positions involved in numerous contacts is estimated from the calculated folding free energy difference between mutated and native structures. The results show that these critical positions are not tolerant towards mutation. This simulation of the noncovalent contacts only needs a sequence as input, and this paper proposes a validation of the method by comparison with the prediction of stability by well-established programs.

Prediction of Structural and Functional Aspects of Protein

To predict the structure of protein from a primary amino acid sequence is computationally difficult. An investigation of the methods and algorithms used to predict protein structure and a thorough knowledge of the function and structure of proteins are critical for the advancement of biology and the life sciences as well as the development of better drugs, higher-yield crops, and even synthetic bio-fuels. To that end, this chapter sheds light on the methods used for protein structure prediction. This chapter covers the applications of modeled protein structures and unravels the relationship between pure sequence information and three-dimensional structure, which continues to be one of the greatest challenges in molecular biology. With this resource, it presents an all-encompassing examination of the problems, methods, tools, servers, databases, and applications of protein structure prediction, giving unique insight into the future applications of the modeled protein structures. In this chapter, current protein structure prediction methods are reviewed for a milieu on structure prediction, the prediction of structural fundamentals, tertiary structure prediction, and functional imminent. The basic ideas and advances of these directions are discussed in detail.