inquiry skill
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

13
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Michael Leonard D. Lubiano ◽  
Marife S. Magpantay

This study enhanced the 7E instructional model towards enriching the science inquiry skills of senior high school learners in General Chemistry 1. A total of 136 Grade 12 learners enrolled in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) strand participated in the study. The study was composed of three phases. In Phase I, the generated themes nature of topics, learning environment, learner-related and teacher-related issues were found to be the causes of difficulty in science inquiry skill enrichment. The learners’ meaningful learning experiences during the process were encapsulated in Phase II. Finally, Phase III used the generated themes in the enhancement of 7E instructional model promoting inquiry-based and constructive learning among senior high school learners.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Luh Sukariasih ◽  
I Gede Purwana Edi Saputra ◽  
Fahrudi Ahwan Ikhsan ◽  
Andri Estining Sejati ◽  
Khaerun Nisa

The study aims to improve the learning outcomes in the field of knowledge and inquiry skill in class VIII 5 SMP Negeri 14 Kendari on the subject matter of light in atmosphere as the effect of applying the guided inquiry learning model assisted by science KIT. The method of the study used a classroom action research with research design is cycle model. The research subject is the students of class VIII 5 SMP Negeri 14 Kendari in the academic year 2016/2017 which consist of 26 students. The learning data achievements of the learners' realm were obtained through the learning result test (cycle test), the skill data of the learners were obtained through the inquiry sheet, and then was analyzed used the descriptive statistics.  Results of data analysis are: 1) learning outcomes increased from 60,31 in cycle I to 75 in cycle II; 2) the students group inquiry skill increased form average value 2.68 (enough category) in the cycle I to 3.15 (good category) in cycle II; 3) the students mastery learning percentage increase from 42.31% (11 students) in cycle I to 77% (20 students) in cycle II. It could be concluded that the implementation of guided inquiry learning model assisted by science KIT could improve the learning outcomes of knowledge and inquiry skill domain on Class VIII 5 SMP Negeri 14 Kendari in the subject matter of light in atmosphere. Keywords: guided inquiry, inquiry skills, learning outcomes,science KIT.   References Ahmadi, L. (2015). Pemanfaatan Alat KIT pada Pembelajaran.Gorontalo: Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. Aksa, F.I., Utaya, S., & Bachri, S. (2019). Geografi dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu. Majalah Geografi Indonesia,33(1), 43-37. Amaliana, I. (2017). Teacher-centered or Student-centered Learning Approach to Promote Learning?. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 10(2), 59-70. Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (2015). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom (A. Priantoro, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Arikunto, S. (2016). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Depdiknas. (2004). Kurikulum Mata PelajaranSains SMP danMTs.Jakarta: Depdiknas. Greenwald, R.R.,&Quitadamo, I.J. (2014). A Mind of Their Own: Using Inquiry-based Teaching to Build Critical Thinking Skills and Intellectual Engagement in an Undergraduate Neuroanatomy Course. The Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(2), 100-106. Hardianti, T., & Kuswanto, H. (2017). Difference among Levels of Inquiry: Process Skills Improvement at Senior High School in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 119-130. Hidayati, D.N., Amaluddin, L.O., & Surdin. (2016). The Effect Guided Inquiry to Critical Thinking Ability to Build Student Character in Geography Subject. Social Science, Education and Humanities Research,9(1), 367-371. Kuhlthau, C.C., Maniotes, L.K., & Caspari, A.K. (2015). Guided Inquiry: Learning In The 21st Century(2nd ed.). California: Libraries Unlimeted. Mulyana, S., Rusdi, & Vivanti, D. (2018). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning Model and Scientific Performance on Student Learning Outcome. Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 2(1), 105-109. Niana, R., Sarwanto, & Ekawati, E.Y. (2016). The Application of Guided Inquiry Model on Physic Learning to Improve Scientific Attitude and Students Analysis Ability. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Teacher Training and Education Sebelas Maret University,2(1), 605-615. Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of The Child. New York: Wiley. Putra, M.I.S., Widodo, W., & Jatmiko, B. (2016). The Development of Guided Inquiry Science Learning Materials to Improve Science Literacy Skill of Prospective MI Teachers.JPII, 5(1), 83-93. Riduwan. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito. Sanjaya, W. (2014). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. Sapriya. (2014). Pendidikan IPS. Bandung: RemajaRosdaKarya. Sarwi, S.,& Prayitno, W.W. (2016). Implementation of Guided Inquiry Physics Instruction to Increase An Understanding Concept and to Develop The Students Character Conservation. JurnalPendidikanFisika Indonesia,12(1), 1-7. Sitorus, H.H., Hasruddin, & Edi, S. (2017). The Influence of Inquiry Learning Model on Student’s Scientific Attitudes in Ecosystem Topic at MTs. Daarul Hikmah Sei Alim (Islamic Junior High School) Asahan. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 4(11), 170-175. Sohibun. (2014). Penerapan Strategi Belajar Dengar Lihat Kerjakan (Delikan) Berbasis Laboratorium Mini terhadap Ketrampilan Proses Sains (KPS) Siswa SMA Kelas X MIA. Jurnal Imliah Edu Research, 3(1), 53-67. Sudjana, N. (2014). Penelitian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan   R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Tim Direktorat Pembinaan SMP. (2017). Panduan Penilaian oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Wardani, S., Nurhayati, S., & Safitri, A. (2015). The Effectiveness of the Guided Inquiry Learning Module towards Students’ Character and Concept Understanding. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(6), 1589-1594. Yewang, M.U.K., Degeng, I.N.S., Setyosari, P., & Sulton. (2016). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning Method VS Free Inquiry Against Learning Outcomes. International Conference on EducationUM, 561-568. Zaini, M. (2016). Guided Inquiry Based Learning on the Concept of Ecosystem Toward Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking Skills of  High School Student. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 6(6), 50-55.   Copyright (c) 2019 Geosfera Indonesia Journal and Department of Geography Education, University of Jember This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share A like 4.0 International License


2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-Apr ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E. Arnold ◽  
Virginia D. Bourdeau ◽  
Brooke D. Nott

In recent years there has been an increased emphasis on science learning in 4-H and other youth development programs. In an effort to increase science capacity in youth, it is easy to focus only on developing the concrete skills and knowledge that a trained scientist must possess. However, when science learning is presented in a youth-development setting, the context of the program also matters. This paper reports the development and testing of the Science Process Skills Inventory (SPSI) and its usefulness for measuring science inquiry skill development in youth development science programs. The results of the psychometric testing of the SPSI indicated the instrument is reliable and measures a cohesive construct called science process skills, as reflected in the 11 items that make up this group of skills. The 11 items themselves are based on the cycle of science inquiry, and represent the important steps of the complete inquiry process.


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Sao Pedro ◽  
Ryan S. J. de Baker ◽  
Janice D. Gobert ◽  
Orlando Montalvo ◽  
Adam Nakama

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document