Balancing Speed and Accuracy in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Function Post-Processing: Comparing 2 Levels of Automation in 3 Vendors to Manual Assessment

Automating cardiac function assessment on cardiac magnetic resonance short-axis cines is faster and more reproducible than manual contour-tracing; however, accurately tracing basal contours remains challenging. Three automated post-processing software packages (Level 1) were compared to manual assessment. Subsequently, automated basal tracings were manually adjusted using a standardized protocol combined with software package-specific relative-to-manual standard error correction (Level 2). All post-processing was performed in 65 healthy subjects. Manual contour-tracing was performed separately from Level 1 and 2 automated analysis. Automated measurements were considered accurate when the difference was equal or less than the maximum manual inter-observer disagreement percentage. Level 1 (2.1 ± 1.0 min) and Level 2 automated (5.2 ± 1.3 min) were faster and more reproducible than manual (21.1 ± 2.9 min) post-processing, the maximum inter-observer disagreement was 6%. Compared to manual, Level 1 automation had wide limits of agreement. The most reliable software package obtained more accurate measurements in Level 2 compared to Level 1 automation: left ventricular end-diastolic volume, 98% and 53%; ejection fraction, 98% and 60%; mass, 70% and 3%; right ventricular end-diastolic volume, 98% and 28%; ejection fraction, 80% and 40%, respectively. Level 1 automated cardiac function post-processing is fast and highly reproducible with varying accuracy. Level 2 automation balances speed and accuracy.

Abstract 96: CTP-Mismatch Maps Improve Interobserver Agreement

Introduction: The use of mismatch between the ischemic core and penumbra to select patients who are likely to benefit from acute stroke therapy has gained popularity. Interpretation of the ischemic core and penumbra on standard CT-perfusion (CTP) maps is subjective. This may lead to variability among physicians in the decision if a patient is a good candidate for acute stroke therapy. A CTP-Mismatch map with outlines of the ischemic core and penumbra could limit this variability. The goal of this study was to determine if inter-observer agreement regarding a patient’s suitability for acute stroke therapy improves with the use of a CTP-Mismatch map. The figure shows a typical CTP-Mismatch map. Methods: Ninety-six consecutive patients evaluated with CTP prior to intra-arterial therapy at St. Lukes Hospital in 2008-09 were included. 79 patients had adequate quality CTP for this analysis. Standard CTP maps (CBV, CBF, MTT, and Tmax) and a CTP-Mismatch map were generated with a fully automated program for processing of CTP source images (RAPID). RAPID assessed the ischemic core using a CBF threshold <30% of the contralateral hemisphere (rCBF<30%). The ischemic penumbra was defined by a Tmax threshold of >6 sec (Tmax>6s). The standard CTP maps and the CTP-Mismatch map were independently analyzed by two vascular neurologists in a blinded fashion. The raters assessed a patient's suitability for intra-arterial therapy based on the following mismatch criteria: (1) a ratio between (Tmax>6s) and (rCBF<30%) volumes >1.8 and (2) an absolute difference between (Tmax>6s) and (CBF<30%) volumes >15ml. Interobserver reliability was assessed with Cohen’s kappa. Results: When assessment of suitability for intra-arterial therapy was based on interpretation of standard CTP maps, the two raters agreed in 58 of 79 patients (kappa=0.46; 95% CI=0.24-0.60). The agreement between observers improved when suitability was determined using CTP-Mismatch maps (agreement in 76 of 79 cases; kappa=0.92; 95% CI=0.75-0.92; p<0.001 for difference between kappa values). The 3 cases with inter-observer disagreement had artifact on the CTP-Mismatch map. Following concensus adjudication of these 3 cases, 40 of the 79 patients (51%) were deemed suitable candidates for acute stroke therapy. Conclusion: CTP-Mismatch maps with estimates of ischemic core and penumbra volumes markedly improve inter-observer agreement regarding assessment of suitability for acute stroke therapy. Such maps, which can be generated automatically, may help standardize decision making algorithms for evaluation of potential intra-arterial therapy candidates.

Contrast Venography, the Gold Standard for the Diagnosis of Deep-Vein Thrombosis: lmprovement in Observer Agreement

SummaryTo determine whether the Rabinov-Paulin or the long-leg venography technique should be preferred in the diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis, two independent experienced radiologists blindly assessed two different series of venograms of consecutive outpatients with clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Venograms were obtained from two outpatient clinics of primary referral centres. In one centre the venograms were performed according to the technique of Rabinov and Paulin with the use of 100 ml of radiographic material and spot films of the calf, popliteal and more proximal veins. In the other centre, long-leg films were obtained after the administration of 150 ml of contrast material. The percentage venograms adjudicated as inadequate by at least one radiologist and inter-observer disagreement for both series were used as the main study outcome measures. Prior to the study, both radiologists agreed on the standardized criteria for a normal, abnormal and inadequate test result using a separate set of films.An inadequacy rate of 20% was found for the Rabinov-Paulin venography series (n = 123), whereas only 2% of the L26long-leg films were inadequate for interpretation (p <0.001). The interobserver disagreement for inadequacy, presence or absence of deep-vein thrombosis was 2I% for the Rabinov and Paulin venograms and 4o/" for the long-leg films (kappa, 0.65 and 0.92; 95% confidence intervals: 0.53 to 0.77 and 0.84 to 0.99, respectively; p <0.002).We conclude that the long-leg method is superior to the Rabinov-Paulin method in the venographic diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients since noninterpretable test results are rarely observed and it reduces both unnecessary treatment of patients without deep-vein thrombosis and limits the undertreatment of patients with the disease.