sample irradiation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

27
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
pp. 9823
Author(s):  
Sergio Mingo Barba ◽  
Francesco Schillaci ◽  
Roberto Catalano ◽  
Giada Petringa ◽  
Daniele Margarone ◽  
...  

ELIMED has been developed and installed at ELI beamlines as a part of the ELIMAIA beamline to transport, monitor, and use laser-driven ion beams suitable for multidisciplinary applications, including biomedical ones. This paper aims to investigate the feasibility to perform radiobiological experiments using laser-accelerated proton beams with intermediate energies (up to 30 MeV). To reach this goal, we simulate a proton source based on experimental data like the ones expected to be available in the first phase of ELIMED commissioning by using the G4-ELIMED application (an application based on the Geant4 toolkit that simulates the full ELIMED beamline). This allows the study of transmission efficiency and the final characteristics of the proton beam at the sample irradiation point. The Energy Selector System is used as an active energy modulator to obtain the desired beam features in a relatively short irradiation time (around 6 min). Furthermore, we demonstrate the capability of the beamline to filter out other ion contaminants, typically co-accelerated in a laser-plasma environment. These results can be considered as a detailed feasibility study for the use of ELIMED for various user applications such as radiobiological experiments with ultrahigh dose rate proton beams.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20
Author(s):  
Tho Nguyen Thi ◽  
Anh Tran Tuan ◽  
Cuong Trinh Van ◽  
Doanh Ho Van ◽  
Duong Tran Quoc ◽  
...  

The accuracy of elements concentration determination using the k0-standardization method directly depends on irradiation and measurement parameters including Non-1/E epithermal neutron flux distribution shape α (ϕ epi ≈1/E1+α ) , thermal-to-epithermal neutron flux ratio f, efficiency ε, peak area… In the case of the irradiation position at the rotary rack of the Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor (DNRR), the difference of thermal neutron flux between the bottom (3.54x1012 n.cm-2.s-1) and the top (1.93x1012 n.cm-2.s-1) of the 15 cm aluminum container is up to 45%. Therefore, it is necessary to accurately determine above-mentioned parameters in the sample irradiation position. The present paper deals with the determination of the distribution of thermal neutron flux along the sample irradiation container by using 0.1% Au–Al wire activation technique. The thermal neutron flux was then used to calculate the concentration of elements in the Standard Reference Material 2711a and SMELS type III using k0-INAA method at different positions in the container. The obtained results with the neutron flux correction were found to be in good agreement with the certified values. In conclusion, the proposed technique can be applied for activation analyses without sandwiching flux monitors between samples during irradiations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 245 (10) ◽  
pp. 2331-2341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Tomaiuolo ◽  
Antonio Eugenio Chiaravalle ◽  
Michele Mangiacotti ◽  
Antonio Petrella ◽  
Aurelia Di Taranto ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 336-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Rutte ◽  
Jörg A. Pfänder ◽  
Michal Koleška ◽  
Raymond Jonckheere ◽  
Sepp Unterricker

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Kijek ◽  
Alicja Chruścińska

Abstract The so-called thermal “cleaning” applied in thermoluminescence analysis allows distinguishing TL signal originating from different traps of comparable thermal depths. Here, the detailed study on the suitability of a similar approach — which can be called optical “cleaning” — for the analysis of OSL process has been carried out by means of computer modelling. The optical “cleaning” is realized by short optical stimulation applied directly after irradiation. It turns out that this approach does not help to separate signals related to various traps having similar optical cross-section (OCS) values. For some sets of trap parameters, sufficiently good reconstruction of the trap optical cross-sections can be achieved by the analysis of the conventional OSL curve obtained directly after sample irradiation, while the OSL curve analysis after “cleaning” does not provide any additional data. For other cases the analysis of both curves with and without “cleaning” leads to optical cross-section values different from those assumed in the model, but just in such situations the optical “cleaning” can be helpful. The differences between the OSL components of the conventional curve and the one obtained after “cleaning” can be used as indicators of an incompatibility of the trap parameters obtained from the OSL analysis with their actual values.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iain May ◽  
Aaron S. Anderson ◽  
Leo J. Jr. Bitteker ◽  
Michael A. Connors ◽  
Roy Copping ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Tommasi ◽  
E. Dupont ◽  
P. Marimbeau

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document