untargeted profiling
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

36
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 9162
Author(s):  
Leilei Zhang ◽  
Gokhan Zengin ◽  
Gabriele Rocchetti ◽  
Ismail Senkardes ◽  
Jugreet B. Sharmeen ◽  
...  

In the present study, a total of 12 extracts of Rhinanthus angustifolius subsp. grandiflorus, an understudied hemiparasitic species, were obtained using different extraction techniques, namely, homogenizer-assisted extraction (HAE), maceration (MAC), soxhlet (SOX), infusion, and solvents (ethyl acetate, methanol, ethanol, and water), and were evaluated for their in vitro antioxidant and enzyme-inhibiting properties. Additionally, untargeted profiling based on high-resolution mass spectrometry targeted different phytochemical classes, namely, polyphenols, terpenoids, and alkaloids. The highest total phenolic and flavonoid contents were detected using methanol as the extraction solvent. Multivariate statistics following the untargeted profiling revealed that the extraction solvent had a hierarchically higher impact than the extraction method when considering the recovery of bioactive compounds. The methanolic extracts displayed the highest radical-scavenging antioxidant capacity, as provided by CUPRAC and FRAP assays. On the other hand, the water extracts (MAC and HAE) and the infusion extract showed the highest activity as metal chelators (25.66–27.51 mg EDTAE/g). Similarly, the water extract obtained by HAE and the infusion extract revealed the highest phosphomolybdenum activity (3.92 ± 0.14 and 3.71 ± 0.01 mmol TE/g, respectively). The different extracts also exhibited different enzyme inhibition potentials. For instance, HAE and MAC ethanolic extracts inhibited only α-amylase (0.69 ± 0.01 and 0.70 ± 0.01 mmol ACAE/g), while all the other extracts showed a dual inhibition against both carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes tested (i.e., α-amylase: 0.07–0.69 mmol ACAE/g; α-glucosidase: 0.03–1.30 mmol ACAE/g). Nevertheless, the other extracts inhibited acetyl-, butyryl-cholinesterases, or both; MAC–water extract displayed no inhibition against the enzymes. Additionally, all the studied extracts were found to inhibit tyrosinase, ranging from 10.62 to 52.80 mg KAE/g. In general, the water extracts showed weaker inhibition towards the enzymes than the other extracts. This study demonstrated that R. angustifolius is an excellent source of natural antioxidants and enzyme inhibitors that could be further investigated and exploited for pharmaceutical purposes.


Cytotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. S172
Author(s):  
M.A. Chilmonczyk ◽  
A. Bowles ◽  
A.L. Culberson ◽  
E. Horwitz ◽  
A. Fedorov

2020 ◽  
Vol 412 (27) ◽  
pp. 7469-7480
Author(s):  
Gustavo Henrique Bueno Duarte ◽  
Anna Maria Alves de Piloto Fernandes ◽  
Alex Aparecido Rosini Silva ◽  
Hans R. Zamora-Obando ◽  
Alan Gonçalves Amaral ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (7) ◽  
pp. 12-19
Author(s):  
I. V. Plyushchenko ◽  
D. G. Shakhmatov ◽  
I. A. Rodin

A viral development of statistical data processing, computing capabilities, chromatography-mass spectrometry, and omics technologies (technologies based on the achievements of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) in recent decades has not led to formation of a unified protocol for untargeted profiling. Systematic errors reduce the reproducibility and reliability of the obtained results, and at the same time hinder consolidation and analysis of data gained in large-scale multi-day experiments. We propose an algorithm for conducting omics profiling to identify potential markers in the samples of complex composition and present the case study of urine samples obtained from different clinical groups of patients. Profiling was carried out by the method of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. The markers were selected using methods of multivariate analysis including machine learning and feature selection. Testing of the approach was performed using an independent dataset by clustering and projection on principal components.


2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Mohale K. Cecilia ◽  
Assress H. Abrha ◽  
Nyoni Hlengilizwe ◽  
Araya T. Hintsa ◽  
Muhammad Umer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Mackenzie Jo Pearson ◽  
Santosh Kapil ◽  
Paul Norris ◽  
Baljit Ubhi ◽  
Darren Dumlao

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Shephalika Amrapali ◽  
TP Shabeer Ahammad ◽  
Bappa Ghosh ◽  
Namita ◽  
M. K. Singh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document