optical freeform surfaces
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

40
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Micromachines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Ingo Sieber ◽  
Richard Thelen ◽  
Ulrich Gengenbach

3D-inkjet-printing is just beginning to take off in the optical field. Advantages of this technique include its fast and cost-efficient fabrication without tooling costs. However, there are still obstacles preventing 3D inkjet-printing from a broad usage in optics, e.g., insufficient form fidelity. In this article, we present the formulation of a digital twin by the enhancement of an optical model by integrating geometrical measurement data. This approach strengthens the high-precision 3D printing process to fulfil optical precision requirements. A process flow between the design of freeform components, fabrication by inkjet printing, the geometrical measurement of the fabricated optical surface, and the feedback of the measurement data into the simulation model was developed, and its interfaces were defined. The evaluation of the measurements allowed for the adaptation of the printing process to compensate for process errors and tolerances. Furthermore, the performance of the manufactured component was simulated and compared with the nominal performance, and the enhanced model could be used for sensitivity analysis. The method was applied to a highly complex helical surface that allowed for the adjustment of the optical power by rotation. We show that sensitivity analysis could be used to define acceptable tolerance budgets of the process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (25) ◽  
pp. 38252
Author(s):  
Kaiyuan You ◽  
Guangpeng Yan ◽  
Fengzhou Fang ◽  
Zexiao Li ◽  
Yue Zhang

2020 ◽  
Vol 286 ◽  
pp. 116828
Author(s):  
Zebin Xia ◽  
Fengzhou Fang ◽  
Eamonn Ahearne ◽  
Moran Tao

Author(s):  
Ines Fortmeier ◽  
Reyko Schachtschneider ◽  
Vit Ledl ◽  
Ondrej Matousek ◽  
Jens Siepmann ◽  
...  

AbstractA round robin comparison of freeform form measurements was carried out by the project partners and stakeholders of a European metrology research project. Altogether six measuring instruments were considered: five different (pointwise and areal) optical devices and one tactile device. Three optical freeform surfaces were used for the comparison measurements, where two specimens were measured by five instruments and one specimen by four instruments. In this paper, the evaluation methods and results of this round robin are presented for the three freeform surfaces made from a temperature-stable material, Super Invar ®. The freeforms had diameters of 40 mm, 50 mm and 100 mm and best-fit radii of 39.75 mm (convex), 40.9 mm (convex) and 423.5 mm (concave). For comparison, the bilateral pointwise differences between the available measurements were calculated. The root-mean-square values of these differences ranged from 15 nm to 110 nm (neglecting spherical contributions) and provided an insight into the status of typical freeform measurement capabilities for optical surfaces.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (15) ◽  
pp. 18928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shixiang Wang ◽  
Chifai Cheung ◽  
Mingjun Ren ◽  
Mingyu Liu

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 14010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kainian Tong ◽  
Yi Zheng ◽  
Zan Zhang ◽  
Xing Zhao ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
...  

Micromachines ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shixiang Wang ◽  
Chi Cheung ◽  
Mingjun Ren ◽  
Mingyu Liu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document