intraoperative recording
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

38
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason E Chung ◽  
Kristin K Sellers ◽  
Matthew K Leonard ◽  
Laura Gwilliams ◽  
Duo Xu ◽  
...  

A fundamental unit of neural computation is the action potential. While significant advances have been made in the ability to sample action potentials of large numbers of individual neurons in animal models, translation of these methodologies to humans has been lacking due to clinical time constraints, electrical noise in the operating room, and reliability of the methodology. Here we present a reliable method for intraoperative recording of dozens of neurons in humans using the Neuropixels probe, yielding up to ~100 simultaneously-recorded single-units (n=596 across 11 recordings in 8 participants). Most single-units were active within 1 minute of reaching target depth, compatible with clinical time constraints. Cell pairs active close in time were spatially closer in most recordings, demonstrating the power to resolve complex cortical dynamics. Altogether, this approach provides access to population single-unit activity across the depth of human neocortex at scales previously only accessible in animal models.


Author(s):  
Floyd W. van de Graaf ◽  
Özgür Eryigit ◽  
Johan F. Lange

Abstract The availability of intraoperative multimedia recording is increasing. Considering the growing call for physicians’ accountability, it is inevitable that multimedia will play an important role in aiding quality control by improving the adequacy of operative reporting. However, the perspectives of medical professionals on this matter are poorly known. In this cross-disciplinary survey, we aimed to investigate the current viewpoints concerning the use of multimedia recording in the operating room. We conducted an electronic survey among all affiliated members of the Association of Surgeons of the Netherlands, the Dutch Urological Association and the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology containing questions regarding current use of intraoperative recording and the level of likelihood or objection for certain scenarios. The response rate was 27.8%. The survey encompasses 370 (54.5%) surgeons, 71 (10.5%) urologists, 80 (11.8%) gynecologists, and 158 (23.3%) residents in training. 52.4% of respondents feel that the currently used operative report is insufficient for future quality requirements. 58.5% think it is unlikely they would behave differently during surgery when intra-operative video recording is applied. 82.8% think it is unlikely that their surgical methods would be altered. 63.8% of respondents preferred only video registration when intraoperative recording is implemented. The majority of respondents agree that the current method of operative reporting is insufficient for future quality requirements. There is support for intraoperative video recording, however, legal transparency is needed before either intraoperative video or audio recording could be implemented to protect not only the patients, but also the healthcare providers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. e7
Author(s):  
P. Costa ◽  
M. Giacobbi ◽  
F. Ricci ◽  
P.P. Gaglini ◽  
A. Palmitessa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. e7
Author(s):  
P. Costa ◽  
A. Borio ◽  
S. Marmolino ◽  
M. Mogno ◽  
D. Serpella ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (11) ◽  
pp. 2497-2498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Costa ◽  
Pier Paolo Gaglini ◽  
Paolo Tavormina ◽  
Federica Ricci ◽  
Paola Peretta

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 578-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir A. Hakimi ◽  
Allison C. Hu ◽  
Tiffany T. Pham ◽  
Brian J. F. Wong

2017 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 558-560
Author(s):  
A. Merola ◽  
G. Mandybur ◽  
K. Biddell ◽  
T.K. Tareen ◽  
H. Wilson-Perez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document