groundwater contribution
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

79
(FIVE YEARS 18)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 04021006
Author(s):  
Aseem K. Thakur ◽  
Chandra Shekhar P. Ojha ◽  
Vijay P. Singh ◽  
B. B. Chaudhur ◽  
Vidisha Kashyap

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Marçais ◽  
Louis A. Derry ◽  
Luca Guillaumot ◽  
Luc Aquilina ◽  
Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy

<p>We develop a parsimonious model-data fusion to capture the groundwater contribution to stream discharge and its effect on variable transit times. The modeling strategy relies on partitioning infiltration between 1) Boussinesq groundwater flows in shallow aquifers and 2) fast flows close to the surface. Partitioning is controlled by the relative aquifer saturation inducing groundwater return flows and fast flows on saturated soils. Flowpaths are computed with a new 2D particle tracking algorithm to obtain transient transit time distributions. Hydraulic conductivity, total and drainable porosities are constrained through a sequential calibration strategy based on discharge time series and point-based CFC tracer data. Application on a 43 km2 catchment in Brittany (France) highlights the important contribution of old groundwater flow dynamics to streamflow's transit time distributions in all seasons under temperate climate conditions. The calibrated model succeeds in reproducing CFC-based groundwater ages as well as discharge dynamics at the outlet of the catchment. Slow groundwater circulation (baseflow and return flow) represents ca. 75% of the streamflow with strong seasonal variations (between 40 and 95%). Mean transit times are ca. 13 years, varying between 5 and 20 years, inversely proportional to the groundwater contribution. These seasonal variations are dominantly due to the flow partitioning between the aquifer and soil compartments with a second-order contribution of the groundwater transit times stratification.</p>


Author(s):  
Tatiana Trifonova ◽  
Dmitriy Trifonov ◽  
Dmitry Bukharov ◽  
Sergei Abrakhin ◽  
Mileta Arakelian ◽  
...  

Traditionally torrential rains are considered to be the main factor of flood emergence. But with some examples of disastrous floods in absolutely different parts of the world, the rough estimation of the water balance results in the necessity to suggest a correct alternative hypothesis. Our simplest model (taking into account precipitation, evaporation, and soil permeability) clearly points out the significant discrepancy in several events between potentially accumulated and observed water masses. This observation puts forward the idea that precipitation is necessary, but it is not often a sufficient factor for disastrous flood emergence and for the water flow budget. Thus, another available water source, i.e., groundwater, should not be ignored. We consider the reasons and conditions for such phenomena. In this chapter, we will focus only on the causes and forecast of dangerous dynamic phenomena in rock masses. Of particular interest here are water flows through various granite massifs and geological rocks of magmatic origin using nonlinear dynamics approaches.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (26) ◽  
pp. 5512-5527
Author(s):  
Trisha L. Moore ◽  
John L. Nieber ◽  
John S. Gulliver ◽  
Joseph A. Magner

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 566-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastián A. Crespo ◽  
Francisco Fernandoy ◽  
Leandro Cara ◽  
Sebastián Klarian ◽  
Céline Lavergne

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document