growth differentiation factor 5
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

123
(FIVE YEARS 23)

H-INDEX

30
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
AideenM Sullivan ◽  
GerardW O'Keeffe ◽  
SusanR Goulding ◽  
Jayanth Anantha ◽  
LouiseM Collins

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110289
Author(s):  
Michael J. Fitzgerald ◽  
Taylor Mustapich ◽  
Haixiang Liang ◽  
Christopher G. Larsen ◽  
Kate W. Nellans ◽  
...  

Background: As hand surgeons, tendon injuries and lacerations are a particularly difficult problem to treat, as poor healing potential and adhesions hamper optimal recovery. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have been shown to aid in rat Achilles tendon healing after a puncture defect, and this model can be used to study tendon healing in the upper extremity. We hypothesized that ADSCs cultured with growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF5) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) would improve tendon healing after a transection injury. Methods: Rat Achilles tendons were transected and then left either unrepaired or repaired. Both groups were treated with a hydrogel alone, a hydrogel with ADSCs, or a hydrogel with ADSCs that were cultured with GDF5 and PDGF prior to implantation. Tissue harvested from the tendons was evaluated for gene expression of several genes known to play an important role in successful tendon healing. Histological examination of the tendon healing was also performed. Results: In both repaired and unrepaired tendons, those treated with ADSCs cultured with GDF5/PDGF prior to implantation showed the best tendon fiber organization, the smallest gaps, and the most organized blood vessels. Treatment with GDF5/PDGF increased expression of the protenogenesis gene SOX9, promoted cell-to-cell connections, improved cellular proliferation, and enhanced tissue remodeling. Conclusions: Adipose-derived stem cells cultured with GDF5/PDGF prior to implantation can promote tendon repair by improving cellular proliferation, tenogenesis, and vascular infiltration. This effect results in a greater degree of organized tendon healing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth‐Love Damoah ◽  
Nicole Sandoval ◽  
Matthew Shankel ◽  
Charmaine Pira ◽  
Allen Cooper ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Sandoval ◽  
Ruth‐Love Damoah ◽  
Charmaine Pira ◽  
Allen Cooper ◽  
Matthew Shankel ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Jia ◽  
Yaping Jiang ◽  
Yingxing Xu ◽  
Yingzhen Wang ◽  
Tao Li

AbstractBackgroundA great deal of evidence has supported that growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF5) is associated with the occurrence of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), while their results are not consistent. In the present study, we aimed to explore the association between GDF5 gene polymorphism and KOA for a more credible conclusion.MethodsComprehensive literature searches were carried out in English databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (WOS), and Cochrane, and Chinese databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG, and VIP database. After the data were extracted from the required studies, the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined to assess the correlation between GDF5 gene polymorphism and KOA. The publication bias was evaluated by funnel plot.ResultsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 studies on the correlation between GDF5 gene polymorphism and KOA occurrence were eligible for meta-analysis. Among these articles, four studies showed no apparent correlation, while the other 11 studies indicated an obvious correlation. Meanwhile, we also carried out a subgroup analysis of the population. Due to the inevitable heterogeneity, three genetic models were finally selected for analysis. With the allele model (C versus T: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.73~0.87), recessive model (CC versus CT + TT: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.68~0.86), and homozygous model (CC versus TT: OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.58~0.76), GDF5 gene polymorphism decreased the risk of KOA. Besides, a significant association was observed in Caucasians, Asians, and Africans. Meanwhile, the protective effect of genotype C (or CC) in the Asian group was little obvious than that in the Caucasian group and the African group. Although the quality of the included studies was above medium-quality, we obtained results with a low level of evidence.ConclusionsThe results of the meta-analysis showed that the genotype C (or CC) of GDF5 protected against KOA occurrence in Caucasian, Asian, and African populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document