Role of Ureteroscopy in Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Purpose of Review Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is uncommon accounting for less than 10% of all urothelial tumours. Ureteroscopic management (URS) is the first line treatment for low-risk disease and has been increasingly utilised due to technological advances and increasing surgical experience. This review looks at patient outcomes relating to URS, emerging technologies and the role of adjuvant intracavitary therapy in the management of UTUC. Recent Findings URS has firmly established itself in the management algorithm for UTUC, and a good body of evidence supports its use for low-risk disease, wherein oncological outcomes are comparable to traditional nephroureterectomy (RNU). Larger tumours can now be managed using URS with a lower morbidity than radical surgery, though with higher associated local recurrence rate and risk of progression to RNU, and as a result, patient selection and close surveillance remains key. There is limited evidence for adjuvant intracavitary therapy (Mitomycin C or BCG) in UTUC although the development of novel polymers and biodegradable stents may improve drug delivery to the upper urinary tract. Summary URS has a clearly defined role in low-risk UTUC, and its use in larger tumours appears to be appropriate in a selected cohort of patients. The efficacy of adjuvant intracavitary therapy is as of yet undetermined, though developments in delivery techniques are promising. Likewise further developments of laser technology are anticipated to further expand the role of URS.

Advanced Malignant Pleural or Peritoneal Effusion in Patients Treated with Recombinant Adenovirus p53 Injection plus Cisplatin

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant adenovirus p53 agent (rAd-p53) injection combined with cisplatin (CDDP) for the treatment of malignant pleural or peritoneal effusion. After puncture drainage, patients in the treatment group ( n = 27) received intracavitary administration of rAd-p53 (2 × 1012 virus particles) once a week for 4 weeks. At 48 h after each rAd-p53 injection, patients were given intracavitary administration of cisplatin 60 mg/m2. This administration procedure continued once a week for 4 weeks. The control group ( n = 21) received the same intracavitary therapy as the treatment group but without rAd-p53 therapy. Efficacy was evaluated by clinical observations, computed tomography, tumour markers, Karnofsky score and short-term follow-up. The total effective rates for the treatment group (63.0%) were significantly higher than for the control group (42.9%), suggesting that the treatment group benefited over the control group. In conclusion, rAd-p53 therapy is a safe and effective treatment for advanced malignant pleural or peritoneal effusion.