d2 antagonists
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

60
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David D. Kim ◽  
Alasdair M. Barr ◽  
Lulu Lian ◽  
Jessica W. Y. Yuen ◽  
Diane Fredrikson ◽  
...  

AbstractEarly intervention is essential for favorable long-term outcomes in schizophrenia. However, there is limited guidance in the scientific literature on how best to choose between dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) partial agonists and D2R antagonists in early stages of schizophrenia. The aim of this meta-analysis was to directly compare D2R partial agonists with D2R antagonists for efficacy and tolerability, using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved participants diagnosed with first-episode psychosis, schizophrenia, or related psychotic disorders with a duration of illness ≤5 years. Fourteen RCTs, involving 2494 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Aripiprazole was the only identified D2R partial agonist, and was not significantly different from pooled D2R antagonists for overall symptom reduction or all-cause discontinuation. However, aripiprazole was more favorable than pooled D2R antagonists for depressive symptoms, prolactin levels, and triglyceride levels. Specifically, aripiprazole was more favorable than paliperidone for triglyceride levels and more favorable than risperidone and olanzapine, but less favorable than ziprasidone, for weight gain. In addition, aripiprazole was less favorable for akathisia compared with second-generation D2R antagonists, in particular olanzapine and quetiapine, and less favorable for discontinuation due to inefficacy than risperidone. Lastly, aripiprazole was more favorable than haloperidol for various efficacy and tolerability outcomes. In conclusion, aripiprazole’s efficacy did not differ substantially from D2R antagonists in the early course of schizophrenia, whereas differential tolerability profiles were noted. More double-blind RCTs are required comparing the efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole as well as other D2R partial agonists with D2R antagonists in early stages of schizophrenia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 442-447
Author(s):  
Misaki Niu ◽  
Atsushi Kasai ◽  
Kaoru Seiriki ◽  
Misuzu Hayashida ◽  
Masato Tanuma ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank S. Menniti ◽  
Thomas A. Chappie ◽  
Christopher J. Schmidt

PDE10A, a phosphodiesterase that inactivates both cAMP and cGMP, is a unique signaling molecule in being highly and nearly exclusively expressed in striatal medium spiny neurons. These neurons dynamically integrate cortical information with dopamine-signaled value to mediate action selection among available behavioral options. Medium spiny neurons are components of either the direct or indirect striatal output pathways. Selective activation of indirect pathway medium spiny neurons by dopamine D2 receptor antagonists is putatively a key element in the mechanism of their antipsychotic efficacy. While PDE10A is expressed in all medium spiny neurons, studies in rodents indicated that PDE10A inhibition has behavioral effects in several key assays that phenocopy dopamine D2 receptor inhibition. This finding gave rise to the hypothesis that PDE10A inhibition also preferentially activates indirect pathway medium spiny neurons, a hypothesis that is consistent with electrophysiological, neurochemical, and molecular effects of PDE10A inhibitors. These data underwrote industry-wide efforts to investigate and develop PDE10A inhibitors as novel antipsychotics. Disappointingly, PDE10A inhibitors from 3 companies failed to evidence antipsychotic activity in patients with schizophrenia to the same extent as standard-of-care D2 antagonists. Given the notable similarities between PDE10A inhibitors and D2 antagonists, gaining an understanding of why only the latter class is antipsychotic affords a unique window into the basis for this therapeutic efficacy. With this in mind, we review the data on PDE10A inhibition as a step toward back-translating the limited antipsychotic efficacy of PDE10A inhibitors, hopefully to inform new efforts to develop better therapeutics to treat psychosis and schizophrenia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1015-1029
Author(s):  
Martin Zack ◽  
Daniela Lobo ◽  
Candice Biback ◽  
Tim Fang ◽  
Kelly Smart ◽  
...  

Background: The functional role of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in gambling disorder (GD) remains unclear. Aims: This study aimed to investigate the role of D1 activation and the moderating effects of impulsivity, a trait linked with weaker D2-mediated inhibition of dopamine release, in GD subjects. Methods: Thirty (nine female) non-comorbid GD subjects with low (LI), moderate (MI), or high impulsivity (HI) received the preferential D2 antagonist haloperidol (HAL; 3 mg) or the mixed D1–D2 antagonist fluphenazine (FLU; 3 mg), on separate sessions before a 15-minute slot machine game or amphetamine (AMPH; 20 mg), in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, counterbalanced design. Results: On their own, HAL and FLU led to linear increases and decreases, respectively, in desire to gamble across increasing levels of impulsivity. The slot machine and AMPH each evoked an inverted-U pattern of desire to gamble across increasing impulsivity. HAL reversed this effect of the game, whereas FLU did not alter post-game desire. HAL and FLU decreased and increased psychostimulant-like effects of the game, respectively, in LI and MI subjects, but consistently reduced these effects in HI subjects. HAL also altered the salience of negative affective words on a reading task, such that greater salience of negative words coincided with lower post-game desire to gamble. Conclusions: D1 receptors appear to gauge the incentive value of gambling in GD subjects. D1 activation has negative reinforcing effects in HI gamblers and positive reinforcing effects in LI gamblers. Medications that activate D1 could curtail chasing in HI gamblers. D1 blockade could benefit HI gamblers whose main concern is craving.


2019 ◽  
Vol 236 (7) ◽  
pp. 2243-2258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold Gutierrez ◽  
Samantha L. Regan ◽  
Christopher S. Hoover ◽  
Michael T. Williams ◽  
Charles V. Vorhees

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1300-1308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis E Whitton ◽  
Alan I Green ◽  
Diego A Pizzagalli ◽  
Robert M Roth ◽  
Jill M Williams ◽  
...  

Abstract Antipsychotics that are potent dopamine (DA) D2 receptor antagonists have been linked to elevated levels of nicotine dependence in smokers with schizophrenia. Because activation of D2 receptors mediates motivation for nicotine, we examined whether potent D2 antagonists would diminish nicotine’s ability to stimulate reward processing—a mechanism that may drive compensatory increases in smoking. Smokers with schizophrenia (n = 184) were recruited and stratified into medication groups based on D2 receptor antagonist potency. The effects of smoking on reward function were assessed using a probabilistic reward task (PRT), administered pre- and post-smoking. The PRT used an asymmetrical reinforcement schedule to produce a behavioral response bias, previously found to increase under conditions (including smoking) that enhance mesolimbic DA signaling. Among the 98 participants with valid PRT data and pharmacotherapy that could be stratified into D2 receptor antagonism potency, a medication × smoking × block interaction emerged (P = .005). Post-hoc tests revealed a smoking × block interaction only for those not taking potent D2 antagonists (P = .007). This group exhibited smoking-related increases in response bias (P < .001) that were absent in those taking potent D2 antagonists (P > .05). Our findings suggest that potent D2 antagonists diminish the reward-enhancing effects of nicotine in smokers with schizophrenia. This may be a mechanism implicated in the increased rate of smoking often observed in patients prescribed these medications. These findings have important clinical implications for the treatment of nicotine dependence in schizophrenia.


Author(s):  
Maria Skokou ◽  
Evangelia-Eirini Tsermpini ◽  
Adamantia Giamarelou ◽  
Athanasios Gogos ◽  
Philippos Gourzis

Author(s):  
Keiko Ikemoto

Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) hyperactivity is a well-known pathophysiological hypothesis of schizophrenia. The author shows a hypothesis to clarify the molecular basis of mesolimbic DA hyperactivity of schizophrenia. An immunohistochemical method was used to show D-neuron (trace amine (TA) neuron) decrease in the nucleus accumbens (Acc) of postmortem brains with schizophrenia. The striatal D-neuron decrease in schizophrenia and consequent (TAAR1) stimulation decrease onto terminals of midbrain ventral tegmental area (VTA) DA neurons induces mesolimbic DA hyperactivity of schizophrenia. Dysfunction of subventricular neural stem cells (NSC), located partially overlapping Acc is the cause of D-neuron decrease in Acc. DA hyperactivity, which inhibits NSC proliferation, causes disease progression of schizophrenia. The highlight is the rational that the “D-cell hypothesis (TA hypothesis) of schizophrenia” is a pivotal theory to link NSC dysfunction hypothesis to DA hypothesis. From a therapeutic direction, (1) TAAR1 agonists, (2) DA D2 antagonists, and (3) neurotrophic substances have potential to normalize mesolimbic DA hyperactivity. To develop novel therapeutic strategies, metabolisms of TAAR1 ligands, and NSC- and D-neuron-pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric illnesses should further be explored.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 1761
Author(s):  
G.C. Marinescu ◽  
S.N. Popa ◽  
I.C. Zarioiu
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document