cyclic shear test
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

14
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Maciejewski ◽  
Sebastian Bąk ◽  
Paweł Ciężkowski

AbstractThe problem of numerical simulation of the material interface response under monotonic and cyclic loading is of fundamental scientific and engineering importance. In fact, such interfaces occur in most engineering and geotechnical structures. The present work is devoted to the deformational response analysis of contact interfaces under monotonic and cyclic loads. The class of materials includes rock and structural joints, soil structure interfaces, masonry and cementitious joints, localized shear bands and so on.The aim of the proposed model is to simulate the cyclic shear test under constant normal load. The associated dilatancy effect is associated with the configurational effects of asperity interaction or dilatancy of wear debris layer. The large primary asperities are assumed as responsible for interfacial dilation and small size asperities as governing frictional sliding and hysteresis response. The elliptic loading yield function is assumed to translate and rotate during progressive or reverse loading events. The model formulation is discussed and confronted with experimental data.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haneen Mohammed ◽  
Nick Thom ◽  
Andrew Dawson

Roller compacted concrete (RCC) is a form of plain concrete pavement (JPCP). RCC is a zero-slump concrete consisting of well-graded aggregate, cement and water. RCC has many advantages over other pavement types, particularly cost and speed of construction. Recently, RCC has undergone many developments mostly directed towards improving quality, including smoothness and durability. RCC now has the potential to combine the performance of concrete with the low cost of asphalt installation. A two-layer system of RCC with different aggregate types and sizes was utilized in this study. This paper presents the determination of load transfer stiffness across induced joints in a two-layer RCC system based on a cyclic shear test. The test was carried out for three different upper layer placement cases with different crack widths and load magnitudes. From the test results, an approximate equation was formulated to predict joint deterioration. It is suggested that this equation provides a useful tool to assist in the design of two-layer RCC pavement and, potentially for other concrete pavement types.


2019 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 05012
Author(s):  
Chikako Fujiyama ◽  
Yasuhiro Koda ◽  
Noriaki Sento

The aim of this study is to identify a specific degradation of concrete that has been observed in bridge decks made of reinforced concrete (RC). To control the phenomenon, fundamental studies were conducted. Compressive loads and external water pressure were cyclically applied to submerged concrete cylinder specimens with different pre-loading and restraint conditions. The turbidity of the water in the tank was generally observed during the loading, and the pH of the turbid water steadily increased as the number of cycles increased. Thereafter, fine aggregates without a cement matrix were found on the inner surfaces of split specimens. These phenomena were quantitatively analyzed, and the analyses suggested that cyclic water pressure acted on the inside of pre-cracked specimens and washed out their cement matrix. The degradation of a rough cracked surface was also examined using the cyclic shear test, with/without a water supply to the crack. The shear slip and the orthogonal displacement were clearly amplified with an increase in the number of cycles when the water supply was present. The mechanical properties of cracked concrete with water in shear was discussed in accordance with that of liquefaction. These fundamental studies could help to determine the acceleration factors of the degradation and provide certain thresholds for practical use.


Author(s):  
Bin Gu ◽  
Ji He ◽  
Shuhui Li ◽  
Yuan Chen ◽  
Yongfeng Li

Springback is an important issue for the application of advanced high-strength steels (AHSS) in the automobile industry. Various studies have shown that it is an effective way to predict springback by using path-dependent material models. The accuracy of these material models greatly depends on the experimental test methods as well as material parameters calibrated from these tests. The present cyclic sheet metal test methods, like uniaxial tension–compression test (TCT) and cyclic shear test (CST), are nonstandard and various. The material parameters calibrated from these tests vary greatly from one to another, which makes the usage of material parameters for the accurate prediction of springback more sophisticated even when the advanced material model is available in commercial software. The focus of this work is to compare the springback prediction accuracy by using the material parameters calibrated from tension–compression test or cyclic shear test, and to further clarify the usage of those material parameters in application. These two types of nonstandard cyclic tests are successfully carried out on a same test platform with different specimen geometries. One-element models with corresponding tension–compression or cyclic shear boundary conditions are built, respectively, to calibrate the parameters of the modified Yoshida–Uemori (YU) model for these two different tests. U-bending process is performed for springback prediction comparison. The results show, for dual phase steel (DP780), the work hardening stagnation is not evident by tension–compression tests at all the prestrain levels or by cyclic shear test at small prestrain γ = 0.20 but is significantly apparent by cyclic shear tests at large prestrain γ = 0.38, 0.52, 0.68, which seems to be a prestrain-dependent phenomenon. The material parameters calibrated from different types of cyclic sheet metal tests can vary greatly, but it gives slight differences of springback prediction for U-bending by utilizing either tension–compression test or cyclic shear test.


2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 04016171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Tozzo ◽  
Antonio D’Andrea ◽  
Imad L. Al-Qadi

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 541-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennaro Magliulo ◽  
Marianna Ercolino ◽  
Maddalena Cimmino ◽  
Vittorio Capozzi ◽  
Gaetano Manfredi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document