Vasopressin antagonism in heart failure: a review of the hemodynamic studies and major clinical trials

For decades, plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) levels have been known to be elevated in patients with congestive heart failure (HF). Excessive AVP signaling at either or both the V1a and V2 receptors could contribute to the pathophysiology of HF by several mechanisms. V1a activation could cause vasoconstriction and/or direct myocardial hypertrophy as intracellular signaling pathways are closely related to those for angiotensin II. V2 activation could cause fluid retention and hyponatremia. A hemodynamic study with the pure V2 antagonist tolvaptan (TV) showed minimal hemodynamic effects. Compared with furosemide in another study, the renal and neurohormonal effects of TV were favorable. Several clinical trials with TV as adjunctive therapy in acute HF have shown beneficial effects on fluid balance and dyspnea, with no worsening of renal function or neurohormonal stimulation. Two smaller studies, one in acute and one in chronic HF, have shown comparable clinical and more favorable renal and neurohormonal effects of TV compared with loop diuretics. However, long-term treatment with TV did not alter outcomes in acute HF. No data are available other than single-dose studies of an intravenous pure V1a antagonist, which showed a vasodilating effect if plasma AVP levels were elevated. One hemodynamic study and one short-duration clinical trial with the balanced intravenous V1a/V2 antagonist conivaptan (CV) showed hemodynamic and clinical effects largely similar to those with TV in similar studies. A new orally effective balanced V1/V2 antagonist (pecavaptan) is currently undergoing phase II study as both adjunctive and alternative therapy during and after hospitalization for acute HF. The purpose of this review is to summarize what we have learned from the clinical experience with TV and CV, and to suggest implications of these findings for future work with newer agents.

Arginine vasopressin modulates electrical activity and calcium homeostasis in pulmonary vein cardiomyocytes

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexists with congestive heart failure (HF) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) V1 receptor antagonists are used to treat hyponatremia in HF. However, the role of AVP in HF-induced AF still remains unclear. Pulmonary veins (PVs) are central in the genesis of AF. The purpose of this study was to determine if AVP is directly involved in the regulation of PV electrophysiological properties and calcium (Ca2+) homeostasis as well as the identification of the underlying mechanisms. Methods Patch clamp, confocal microscopy with Fluo-3 fluorescence, and Western blot analyses were used to evaluate the electrophysiological characteristics, Ca2+ homeostasis, and Ca2+ regulatory proteins in isolated rabbit single PV cardiomyocytes incubated with and without AVP (1 μM), OPC 21268 (0.1 μM, AVP V1 antagonist), or OPC 41061 (10 nM, AVP V2 antagonist) for 4–6 h. Results AVP (0.1 and 1 μM)-treated PV cardiomyocytes had a faster beating rate (108 to 152%) than the control cells. AVP (1 μM) treated PV cardiomyocytes had higher late sodium (Na+) and Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) currents than control PV cardiomyocytes. AVP (1 μM) treated PV cardiomyocytes had smaller Ca2+i transients, and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ content as well as higher Ca2+ leak. However, combined AVP (1 μM) and OPC 21268 (0.1 μM) treated PV cardiomyocytes had a slower PV beating rate, larger Ca2+i transients and SR Ca2+ content, smaller late Na+ and NCX currents than AVP (1 μM)-treated PV cardiomyocytes. Western blot experiments showed that AVP (1 μM) treated PV cardiomyocytes had higher expression of NCX and p-CaMKII, and a higher ratio of p-CaMKII/CaMKII. Conclusions AVP increases PV arrhythmogenesis with dysregulated Ca2+ homeostasis through vasopressin V1 signaling.