Rodent General Anesthesia Suitable for Measurement of Experimental Invasive Hemodynamics

In cases of experimentally performed invasive rodent cardiovascular measurements, selected general anesthesia for a non-recovery procedure and its proper pain control plays a fundamental role in obtaining good data recordings. Rodent anesthesia is challenging for several reasons including high metabolic rate with elevated possibility of hypothermia and hypoglycemia during the procedure, large body surface area to adjust drug medication and anticipate drug clearance. In this review article, suitable analgesia, and anesthesia to collect rodent hemodynamics is discussed with examples of commonly used methods and anesthetic combinations to assess rodent hemodynamics. In case of injectable anesthesia, hemodynamic parameters should be measured when HR and mean arterial pressure (MAP) becomes stable. If re-injection is necessary, re-evaluation of HR and MAP is crucial for data integrity. Likewise, to safeguard data quality, longitudinal collection of HRs, HR variability, MAP and body temperature should be provided. For this reason, creation of a rodent hemodynamic anesthesia protocol might be necessary. In many cases, to refine surgical anesthetic protocol suitable for hemodynamic study, pilot experiments might be required to find the correct dose, and to probe for adequacy and duration of anesthesia, anticipating technical and procedural problems. Additionally, ensuring repeatability of the hemodynamic exam, selected experimental anesthetics should not be extensively metabolized. If metabolized, the effects on central and peripheral hemodynamics (HR, pre, afterload and contractility) should be well-known and documented.

Pralidoxime improves the hemodynamics and survival of rats with peritonitis-induced sepsis

Several studies have suggested that sympathetic overstimulation causes deleterious effects in septic shock. A previous study suggested that pralidoxime exerted a pressor effect through a mechanism unrelated to the sympathetic nervous system; this effect was buffered by the vasodepressor action of pralidoxime mediated through sympathoinhibition. In this study, we explored the effects of pralidoxime on hemodynamics and survival in rats with peritonitis-induced sepsis. This study consisted of two sub-studies: survival and hemodynamic studies. In the survival study, 66 rats, which survived for 10 hours after cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), randomly received saline placebo, pralidoxime, or norepinephrine treatment and were monitored for up to 24 hours. In the hemodynamic study, 44 rats were randomly assigned to sham, CLP-saline placebo, CLP-pralidoxime, or CLP-norepinephrine groups, and hemodynamic measurements were performed using a conductance catheter placed in the left ventricle. In the survival study, 6 (27.2%), 15 (68.1%), and 5 (22.7%) animals survived the entire 24-hour monitoring period in the saline, pralidoxime, and norepinephrine groups, respectively (log-rank test P = 0.006). In the hemodynamic study, pralidoxime but not norepinephrine increased end-diastolic volume (P <0.001), stroke volume (P = 0.002), cardiac output (P = 0.003), mean arterial pressure (P = 0.041), and stroke work (P <0.001). The pressor effect of norepinephrine was short-lived, such that by 60 minutes after the initiation of norepinephrine infusion, it no longer had any significant effect on mean arterial pressure. In addition, norepinephrine significantly increased heart rate (P <0.001) and the ratio of arterial elastance to ventricular end-systolic elastance (P = 0.010), but pralidoxime did not. In conclusion, pralidoxime improved the hemodynamics and 24-hour survival rate in rats with peritonitis-induced sepsis, but norepinephrine did not.

Vasopressin antagonism in heart failure: a review of the hemodynamic studies and major clinical trials

For decades, plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) levels have been known to be elevated in patients with congestive heart failure (HF). Excessive AVP signaling at either or both the V1a and V2 receptors could contribute to the pathophysiology of HF by several mechanisms. V1a activation could cause vasoconstriction and/or direct myocardial hypertrophy as intracellular signaling pathways are closely related to those for angiotensin II. V2 activation could cause fluid retention and hyponatremia. A hemodynamic study with the pure V2 antagonist tolvaptan (TV) showed minimal hemodynamic effects. Compared with furosemide in another study, the renal and neurohormonal effects of TV were favorable. Several clinical trials with TV as adjunctive therapy in acute HF have shown beneficial effects on fluid balance and dyspnea, with no worsening of renal function or neurohormonal stimulation. Two smaller studies, one in acute and one in chronic HF, have shown comparable clinical and more favorable renal and neurohormonal effects of TV compared with loop diuretics. However, long-term treatment with TV did not alter outcomes in acute HF. No data are available other than single-dose studies of an intravenous pure V1a antagonist, which showed a vasodilating effect if plasma AVP levels were elevated. One hemodynamic study and one short-duration clinical trial with the balanced intravenous V1a/V2 antagonist conivaptan (CV) showed hemodynamic and clinical effects largely similar to those with TV in similar studies. A new orally effective balanced V1/V2 antagonist (pecavaptan) is currently undergoing phase II study as both adjunctive and alternative therapy during and after hospitalization for acute HF. The purpose of this review is to summarize what we have learned from the clinical experience with TV and CV, and to suggest implications of these findings for future work with newer agents.