Editorial

Ledare för vol. 32/2 av Nordisk judaistik Editorial for Vol. 32/2 of Scandianvia Jewish Studies

Defining Prophecy

This chapter examines some terminology and definitions of prophecy. It explores scholarly definitions from Classics, Ancient Philosophy, Jewish Studies, and early Christian studies before turning more specifically to Greek philosophical definitions, early Christian definitions, Origen’s own definitions, and scholars’ interpretations of Origen’s views on prophecy. It argues that while insights from various fields are relevant for understanding Origen, his definition of prophecy is highly unusual and focuses not just on future-telling, but revelation of mystic truths as well as understanding of time and the cosmos. The chapter concludes by demonstrating that previous scholarship on Origen’s view of prophecy has tended to limit itself to specific features rather than taking a wide-angled view of the topic as this book does.

Jewish American Literature Against the World

By way of a brief genealogy of the Jewish American literary field and through the lens of recent attempts to imagine how comparative literature-based thinking about a concept of “world literature” can be critically productive for Jewish literary study, this article analyzes Jewish American literary studies’ prestige problem. Because it has persistently failed to theorize the intellectual and methodological assumptions underlying its practice, Jewish American literary study remains burdened by the essentialist implications of an ethnological historicism. This article ultimately argues that Jewish American literary study needs to take more seriously the possibilities offered by a materialist epistemology rather than the Jewish studies-based historicist ontology it has mostly taken for granted. “My hope is that a Jewish American epistemology can operate outside the penumbra of a tired and played-out concept of ethnicity—a term that unavoidably, if spectrally, posits a biologistic object at the heart of its historicist project—even as it might still claim the mantle of Jewish-y-ness.”

Emma Goldman

Both in the United States and internationally, the anarchist Emma Goldman earned a reputation as a prominent Jewish radical feminist. Goldman became a household name at a time when that was extremely rare for a woman. Anarchism and Emma Goldman played a significant role in US politics around the turn into the 20th century, as they were also key for the development of US Jewish life, feminism, and the Left more generally. Like most Jews in the United States, even in her day, Goldman was secular, and also identifiably Jewish culturally. She was concerned about the potential statism of Zionism, but at the time most Jews in the United States and globally, of all political stripes, were similarly not Zionist. She also never hesitated to offer apt critiques of Jews whose politics differed from hers. Identified as “the most dangerous anarchist in America” of her day and a most dangerous woman, she was accused of terrorism for her political ideals and activism in a way that foreshadowed the ensuing century of US elites targeting justice workers by calling them terrorists. More broadly for Jews and Jewish studies, anarchist theory and what that meant for this Jewish feminist activist and thinker are among the best frames for understanding Jewish life without a central authority structure, and particularly in the diasporic context.