carbonate ramp
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

329
(FIVE YEARS 37)

H-INDEX

33
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Sedimentology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Hallenberger ◽  
Lars Reuning ◽  
Stefan Back ◽  
Stephen J. Gallagher ◽  
Hokuto Iwatani ◽  
...  

Facies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Vršič ◽  
H.-J. Gawlick ◽  
F. Schlagintweit ◽  
E. Machaniec ◽  
M. Gharsalla

AbstractIn the central-eastern Sirt Basin, enigmatic Intisar domal structures host significant hydrocarbon accumulations. These structures have been commonly interpreted as pinnacle reefs/bioherms occurring in the open-marine basinal environment. Generally, pinnacle reefs/bioherms are mainly characterized by in situ carbonates. The current study challenges the Intisar pinnacle reef/bioherm model by examining one of the domal structures in terms of biostratigraphy, microfacies and depositional environment. These structures were dated using larger benthic foraminifera, which yielded a Middle to Late Paleocene age (Selandian–Early Thanetian). Thirteen microfacies types representing different carbonate ramp environments ranging from outer ramp to inner ramp, were defined. Outer ramp deposits have been observed adjacent to the domal structure, represented mainly by wackestone with small benthic and planktonic foraminifera. The outer ramp deposits are most likely isochronous to the domal structures. The lower part of the domal structures is composed mainly of foraminiferal–algal–echinodermal packstones. The upper part is characterized by foraminiferal–algal–echinodermal packstones with intercalated microbialite–coral boundstones. The euphotic inner ramp deposits are preserved on the crest of the domal structure, consisting of grainstone and packstone rich in Glomalveolina. As a result of this study, the Intisar domal structures are seen as erosional relics of a carbonate ramp and no evidence for pinnacle reef/bioherm model was found.


Author(s):  
Matías J. MANGO ◽  
undefined Guillermo L. ALBANESI

Conodonts from the upper La Silla (9.6 m thick) and San Juan formations (264.7 m thick) at the Cerro La Silla section are analyzed for the identification of faunal dynamics, biofacies and sea-level changes. The conodont collection of 11 388 specimens was recovered after digestion of 41 samples of carbonate rocks, totalizing 88.155 kg. Conodont total abundance and generic diversity graphs, as well as cluster analysis, reveal seven biofacies. The Colaptoconus, Tropodus-Reutterodus, Oepikodus-Prioniodus, Juanognathus-Bergstroemognathus, Juanognathus-Oepikodus-Protopanderodus, Juanognathus-Protopanderodus, Juanognathus-Semiacontiodus biofacies are determined. These biofacies represent middle to outer carbonate ramp environments for the San Juan Formation. The associated analysis of biofacies and lithology allow for the recognition of two transgressive events in the San Juan Formation at the Cerro La Silla section, which could be related to transgressive systems tracts (TST) that occurred during the Early and Middle Ordovician (middle Tremadocian-early Dapingian).


2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Moser ◽  
Olga Piros

Concerning the Middle Triassic stratigraphic succession of the Northern Calcareous Alps (NCA), a modern, litho- and biostratigraphic oriented evaluation of the early- and middle Anisian Annaberg Formation is presented. Due to the fact, that Middle Triassic formations are characterized by a wide distribution within the NCA, any lithostratigraphic definitions of these formations would be of great benefit for mapping geologists, engineers and hydrogeologists. The lithostratigraphic term Annaberg Formation may substitute former designations like “Alpiner Muschelkalk”, “Anisian Limestone and Dolomite” or, partly, “Gutenstein Limestone”. It is exclusively of Anisian age and earlier then the Steinalm and Reifling Formation. Mainly based on microfacies data and lithological data, we define the Annaberg Formation (former: Annaberg Limestone) as one of the most significant Middle Triassic lithostratigraphic units within the NCA. After a detailed description of the type area, findings gained in other areas of the NCA are incorporated to obtain the largest possible overview about the lithological variability and constituents of the Annaberg Formation. As a result, we can describe the Annaberg Formation as mainly organic-rich, medium bedded wackestone, containing remnants of crinoids, little bivalves and gastropods. Typically, fossil-rich layers with accumulations of bivalves and crinoids can often be observed within the Annaberg Formation. In contrast to the Gutenstein Formation no siliceous concretions or fossils (like radiolarians) appear and the fauna is in the main shallow marine. The rock-colour varies from dark- to medium-grey and the bench thicknesses are greater than within the Gutenstein Formation sensu stricto. The fossil content is also larger than in the essentially anaerobe Gutenstein Formation. With respect to the Virgloria Formation the Annaberg Formation is rather planar bedded, not so rich in bioturbation-structures and poor in silica and clay. Hence, the depositional environment of the Annaberg Formation can be described as a restricted carbonate ramp succession, with only minor water movement and separated from the open sea by a shoal with crinoid and brachiopod meadows. Breccias may be an indication for collapse-structures and slumping. In addition, knife-cavity structures (“Messerstichkalke”) indicate an occasional hypersaline environment with precipitation of evaporite-minerals like gypsum. Fossil-rich layers with accumulations of molluscs and crinoids may indicate short-term storm affected sedimentation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 014459872110052
Author(s):  
Hao Peng ◽  
Cheng Yin ◽  
Yuan Zhong ◽  
Yue-Ming Yang ◽  
Liang Xu ◽  
...  

As an important exploration target in the Sichuan Basin, the Lower Triassic Feixianguan Formation has been previously interpreted to be deposited in the trough-platform margin system according to the genetic model of classic lithofacies paleogeography. However, this model does not apply to the northwestern Sichuan Basin. Accordingly, this study proposed a new genetic model that highlighted the carbonate ramp based on the outcrop sections, drilling and logging data, and seismic sections. A large-scale regional regression was found to occur in Sichuan Basin at the end of the Late Permian, leading to the evolution of the original Kaijiang-Liangping Trough into a very shallow tidal flat/lagoon environment at the beginning of the Early Triassic. The sedimentary pattern during the Early Triassic was different from that during the Late Permian. A total of six long-term cycles (LSC1-LSC6) were identified within the Feixianguan Formation. The deposition of LSC1-LSC3 witnessed the filling of the trough to a large extent, and the depositional periods of LSC4 and LSC5 were the main shoal-forming periods. The Feixianguan Formation in the study area was speculated to be deposited in the continuous continental carbonate ramp. With the intensified uplifting of the Longmenshan island chain and the Kangdian ancient land on the northwestern margin of the Upper Yangtze Platform, a large number of terrigenous materials were input into the study area from west to east, leading to the continuous eastward migration of the carbonate facies belt during the deposition of the Fei 1 and Fei 2 Members. Meanwhile, large-area inner-ramp shoal bodies were formed during the deposition of LSC5. It became possible to find a giant gas reservoir belt in the Feixianguan Formation of the northwestern Sichuan Basin and the results of this study provide a new complement to the existing classic trough-platform margin shoal-forming model.


Sedimentology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosine Riera ◽  
Julien Bourget ◽  
Tony Allan ◽  
Eckart Håkansson ◽  
Moyra E.J. Wilson

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Malik Muhammad Saud Sajid Khan ◽  
Qasim Ali Jadoon ◽  
Muhammad Umar ◽  
Ahsan Ali Khan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document