Facies
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1198
(FIVE YEARS 94)

H-INDEX

56
(FIVE YEARS 5)

Published By Springer-Verlag

1612-4820, 0172-9179

Facies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. J. Vitzthum ◽  
Hans-Jürgen Gawlick ◽  
Reinhard F. Sachsenhofer ◽  
Stefan Neumeister

AbstractThe up to 450 m-thick Upper Jurassic Lemeš Formation includes organic-rich deep-water (max. ~ 300 m) sedimentary rocks deposited in the Lemeš Basin within the Adriatic Carbonate Platform (AdCP). The Lemeš Formation was investigated regarding (1) bio- and chemostratigraphy, (2) depositional environment, and (3) source rock potential. A multi-proxy approach—microfacies, Rock–Eval pyrolysis, maceral analysis, biomarkers, and stable isotope ratios—was used. Based on the results, the Lemeš Formation is subdivided from base to top into Lemeš Units 1–3. Deposition of deep-water sediments was related to a late Oxfordian deepening event causing open-marine conditions and accumulation of radiolarian-rich wackestones (Unit 1). Unit 2, which is about 50 m thick and Lower early Kimmeridgian (E. bimammatum to S. platynota, ammonite zones) in age, was deposited in a restricted, strongly oxygen-depleted basin. It consists of radiolarian pack- and grainstones with high amounts of kerogen type II-S organic matter (avg. TOC 3.57 wt.%). Although the biomass is predominantly marine algal and bacterial in origin, minor terrestrial organic matter that was transported from nearby land areas is also present. The overlying Unit 3 records a shallowing of the basin and a return to oxygenated conditions. The evolution of the Lemeš Basin is explained by buckling of the AdCP due to ophiolite obduction and compressional tectonics in the Inner Dinarides. Lemeš Unit 2 contains prolific oil-prone source rocks. Though thermally immature at the study location, these rocks could generate about 1.3 t of hydrocarbon per m2 surface area when mature.


Facies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarína Šarinová ◽  
Natália Hudáčková ◽  
Samuel Rybár ◽  
Michal Jamrich ◽  
Fred Jourdan ◽  
...  

Facies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Kershaw ◽  
Tingshan Zhang ◽  
Yue Li

AbstractPermian–Triassic boundary microbialites (PTBMs) that formed directly after the end-Permian extinction in the South China Block are dominated by one structure, a lobate-form calcium carbonate construction that created extensive very thin (ca. 2–20 m thick) framework biostromes in shallow marine environments, effectively occupying the ecological position of the prior pre-extinction Permian reefs and/or associated carbonates. In the field, vertical sections show the microbialite is dendrolite (branched) and thrombolite (clotted), but because thrombolite may include branched portions, its structure is overall best classed as thrombolite. In the field and in polished blocks, the microbial material appears as dark carbonate embedded in lighter-coloured micritic sediment, where details cannot be seen at that scale. In thin section, in contrast to the largely unaltered micritic matrix, the microbial constructor is preferentially partly to completely recrystallised, but commonly passes gradationally over distances of a few mm to better-preserved areas comprising 0.1–0.2 mm diameter uneven blobs of fine-grained calcium carbonate (micrite to microsparite). The lobate architecture comprises branches, layers and clusters of blobs ca. 1–20 mm in size, and includes constructed cavities with geopetal sediments, cements and some deposited small shelly fossils. Individual blobs in the matrix may be fortuitous tangential cross sections through margins of accumulated masses, but if separate, may represent building blocks of the masses. The lobate structure is recognised here as a unique microbial taxon and named Calcilobes wangshenghaii n. gen., n. sp. Calcilobes reflects its calcium carbonate composition and lobate form, wangshenghaii for the Chinese geologist (Shenghai Wang) who first detailed this facies in 1994. The structure is interpreted as organically built, and may have begun as separate blobs on the sea floor sediment (that was also composed of micrite but is interpreted as mostly inorganic), by microbial agglutination of micrite. Because of its interpreted original micritic–microsparitic nature, classification as either a calcimicrobe (calcified microbial fossil) or a sedimentary microbial structure is problematic, so C. wangshenghaii has uncertain affinity and nature. Calcilobes superficially resembles Renalcis and Tarthinia, which both form small clusters in shallow marine limestones and have similar problems of classification. Nevertheless, Calcilobes framework architecture contrasts both the open branched geometry of Renalcis, and the small tighter masses of Tarthinia, yet it is more similar to Tarthinia than to Renalcis, and may be a modification of Tarthinia, noting that Tarthinia is known from only the Cambrian. Calcilobes thus joins Renalcis, Tarthinia and also Epiphyton (dendritic form) and others, as problematic microbial structures. Calcilobes has not been recognised elsewhere in the geological record and may be unique to the post-end-Permian extinction facies. C. wangshenghaii occurs almost exclusively in the South China Block, which lay on the eastern margin of Tethys Ocean during Permian–Triassic boundary times; reasons for its absence in western Tethys, except for comparable fabrics in one site in Iran and another in Turkey, are unknown.


Facies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Vršič ◽  
H.-J. Gawlick ◽  
F. Schlagintweit ◽  
E. Machaniec ◽  
M. Gharsalla

AbstractIn the central-eastern Sirt Basin, enigmatic Intisar domal structures host significant hydrocarbon accumulations. These structures have been commonly interpreted as pinnacle reefs/bioherms occurring in the open-marine basinal environment. Generally, pinnacle reefs/bioherms are mainly characterized by in situ carbonates. The current study challenges the Intisar pinnacle reef/bioherm model by examining one of the domal structures in terms of biostratigraphy, microfacies and depositional environment. These structures were dated using larger benthic foraminifera, which yielded a Middle to Late Paleocene age (Selandian–Early Thanetian). Thirteen microfacies types representing different carbonate ramp environments ranging from outer ramp to inner ramp, were defined. Outer ramp deposits have been observed adjacent to the domal structure, represented mainly by wackestone with small benthic and planktonic foraminifera. The outer ramp deposits are most likely isochronous to the domal structures. The lower part of the domal structures is composed mainly of foraminiferal–algal–echinodermal packstones. The upper part is characterized by foraminiferal–algal–echinodermal packstones with intercalated microbialite–coral boundstones. The euphotic inner ramp deposits are preserved on the crest of the domal structure, consisting of grainstone and packstone rich in Glomalveolina. As a result of this study, the Intisar domal structures are seen as erosional relics of a carbonate ramp and no evidence for pinnacle reef/bioherm model was found.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document