bioeconomic models
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

41
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Ihtiyor Bobojonov

Bioeconomic models are analytical tools that integrate biophysical and economic models. These models allow for analysis of the biological and economic changes caused by human activities. The biophysical and economic components of these models are developed based on historical observations or theoretical relations. Technically these models may have various levels of complexity in terms of equation systems considered in the model, modeling activities, and programming languages. Often, biophysical components of the models include crop or hydrological models. The core economic components of these models are optimization or simulation models established according to neoclassical economic theories. The models are often developed at farm, country, and global scales, and are used in various fields, including agriculture, fisheries, forestry, and environmental sectors. Bioeconomic models are commonly used in research on environmental externalities associated with policy reforms and technological modernization, including climate change impact analysis, and also explore the negative consequences of global warming. A large number of studies and reports on bioeconomic models exist, yet there is a lack of studies describing the multiple uses of these models across different disciplines.


Author(s):  
Nossaiba Baba ◽  
Imane Agmour ◽  
Youssef El Foutayeni ◽  
Naceur Achtaich

AbstractThe main objective of this work is the study of the effects of high tides and low tides on fishing effort, catches as well as profits in a bioeconomic model of populations of Sardina pilchardus, Engraulis encrasicolus and Xiphias gladius in Moroccan areas. To achieve this objective, we studied the stability of the equilibrium points of our biological model then we added in our model the effect of the tides in the fishing effort which maximizes the profits of the fishermen under the constraint of the conservation of the biodiversity of these marine species using the generalized Nash equilibrium in the resolution of the bioeconomic model. As results, we were able to give the best fishing times according to the tides of each month of the whole year which will allow us to achieve better yields. Hence the importance of introducing the effect of high and low tides in bioeconomic models.


2020 ◽  
pp. 255-267
Author(s):  
Kenneth E. Mcconnell ◽  
Jon G. Sutinen
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 289-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henk Hogeveen ◽  
Wilma Steeneveld ◽  
Christopher A. Wolf

Mastitis is the most important production disease in dairy farming, leading to considerable inefficiency in production. In 1992, an important paper describing a simple but very useful economic framework for production diseases in animal farming was published. In a systemic literature search, 77 articles were found on the economics of mastitis. Throughout the years, little progress has been made to improve the economic framework regarding production diseases in animal farming, but methodological progress was made in the biological aspect of bioeconomic models. Research focused on the failure costs of mastitis and cost-benefit analyses of cow-level decisions (treatments). The average failure costs of mastitis were $US131 per cow per year. Future economic research should focus more on the utilization of currentlyavailable large databases. The economic framework should be extended toward mastitis as an externality of dairy production (welfare), the externalities of optimal use of chemical and pharmaceutical compounds (antimicrobials), and explaining farmers’ decisions regarding mastitis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33
Author(s):  
Marcos Jun-Iti Yokoo ◽  
Leonardo de Oliveira Seno ◽  
Luiza Corrêa Oliveira ◽  
Pedro U N da Costa ◽  
Gustavo M da Silva ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study aimed to calculate economic values (EVs) and economic selection indices for milk production systems in small rural properties. The traits 305-d milk yield in kg (MY), fat (FP) and protein (PP) percentage, daily fat (FY) and protein (PY) yield, cow live weight in kg (LW), calving interval (CI), and logarithm of daily somatic cell count (SCC) in milk were considered the goals and selection criteria. The production systems were identified from 29 commercial properties based on the inventory of revenues and costs and of zootechnical field data. Later, bioeconomic models were developed to calculate the productive performance, revenues, and costs concerning milk production to estimate EVs, which were calculated as the difference in annual profit with dairy production resulting from a change in one unit of the trait while keeping the others constant and dividing the value by the number of cows. After the EVs were known, ten economic selection indices were estimated for each system so they could be compared by modifying the selection criteria and calculating the relative importance of each selection criteria, the accuracy of the economic selection index, and response expected to the selection in USD, among other parameters. One of the systems detected was called less intensive (LS) and was characterized by having ten cows in lactation that produced 13·5 l/d and consumed 1·8 kg of concentrate/d. The second system detected was called more intensive (IS) and had 22 cows in lactation that produced 17·5 l/d and consumed 3·4 kg of concentrate/d. Monthly profits per cows in lactation of USD 2·60 and USD 68·77 were recorded for LS and IS, respectively. The EVs of the traits MY, FP, and PP were all positive, while for the other traits they were all negative in all situations. The best economic selection indices were those featuring selection criteria MY, LW, and CI, while the trait LW had the greatest importance in both systems. These results indicate that animal frame must be controlled in order to maximize the system's profit.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. e12191
Author(s):  
Charles Sims ◽  
Richard D. Horan ◽  
Benjamin Meadows
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. e12172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biswo N. Poudel ◽  
Krishna P. Paudel

2017 ◽  
Vol 364 ◽  
pp. 124-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sturla Kvamsdal ◽  
José M. Maroto ◽  
Manuel Morán ◽  
Leif K. Sandal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document