Ukrainian Naval history as a component of the maritime code of the nation

This study is based on the information from different textbooks and manuals on the Naval and Navigation History. The Ukrainian publications on the history of navigation and naval history of Ukraine intended for teaching this subject in higher educational institutions are considered. The primary purposes of this study are: firstly, the emphasis is on the argumentation and reliability of historical constructions depending on the maritime professionalism of the researcher; secondly, the visualisation of historical material is presented clearly in the form of both photographs and relevant informative tables, which facilitate the perception of information, and in some cases replace a large number of narrative texts; thirdly, the author’s version of the structuring of the naval history of Ukraine was developed in tabular form. The study uses the statistical, chronological, and comparative approaches. As results, several tables and visual information were compiled, which could replace descriptive verbal historical texts. The connection between the national history of navigation and the Maritime Code of the Nation is established. The conclusion on the security of the state from the maritime threats was made due to the motivation of its defenders due to the professional study of the naval history of Ukraine.

Ukrainian Naval History as a Component of the Maritime Code of the Nation

This study is based on the information from different textbooks and manuals on the Naval and Navigation History. The Ukrainian publications on the history of navigation and naval history of Ukraine intended for teaching this subject in higher educational institutions are considered. The primary purposes of this study are: firstly, the emphasis is on the argumentation and reliability of historical constructions depending on the maritime professionalism of the researcher; secondly, the visualisation of historical material is presented clearly in the form of both photographs and relevant informative tables, which facilitate the perception of information, and in some cases replace a large number of narrative texts; thirdly, the author’s version of the structuring of the naval history of Ukraine was developed in tabular form. The study uses the statistical, chronological, and comparative approaches. As results, several tables and visual information were compiled, which could replace descriptive verbal historical texts. The connection between the national history of navigation and the Maritime Code of the Nation is established. The conclusion on the security of the state from the maritime threats was made due to the motivation of its defenders due to the professional study of the naval history of Ukraine. Recommendation – the practical significance of the study is to form a historical basis for adjusting the Ukrainian Navy’s Development Programme.

Theophrastus on Wind

Wind as a natural phenomenon as well as the peculiarities of specific winds, such as Boreas, Notos, Eurus, and Zephyrus and their influences on navigation, agriculture and, in general, human live are among the subjects, extensively treated by the Peripatetics. Winds are studied in Aristotle’s Meteorology (1.13, 2.4 sq.), Book 26 of the Problems, the Peripatetic On signs and On the position and Names of the Wind, in an epitome of a meteorological work, ascribed to Theophrastus (the so-called Metarsiology, preserved only in Arabic and Syriac translations) and, finally, in his short (and incomplete) treatise On Winds. The latter work is of special interest not only because it is the only Peripatetic treatise especially dedicated to winds; as such it is a valuable witness of Theophrastus’ position on the nature of this natural phenomenon, generally different from the one advanced by Aristotle. Having summarized some aspects of this rather neglected treatise, I try to correlate meteorological information and explanations offered by Theophrastus with contemporary data, especially in the context of the history of navigation.

INTERNATIONAL LAW OF SEA PIRACY

Sea piracy, or piracy, is robbery conducted in sea, or sometimes in beach. It could be said that history of piracy occurs simultaneously with history of navigation. Where there are ships transporting merchandise, appears pirates are ready to have it forcibly. It has been known since the time of the occurrence of piracy Greece ancient. Included in the era Roman republic experienced piracy by the sea robbers. Since then they plow all the ships that are currently floating in the ocean near Borneo and Sumatra. However, the best in its long history written on 16th-17th century and it called as the golden age of pirates. But, the piracy not only in the past era, in the modern era as today, the piracy still exist as the criminal case in Somalia in 1990-2011, Philipine in 2016-2017, Dhobo accident in 2019 etc. The piracy is also can be called as Hostis Humani Generis it is mean the piracy is the enemy of all humans. The piracy ruled in UNCLOS articles 101-110 and in Indonesia is ruled in Criminal Law article 439-440. This article explains the international law of sea piracy, hostage release procedure and court procedure in International Criminal Court (ICC) and international punishment for pirate.

Controversias sobre el cosmógrafo Andrés García de Céspedes = Controversies about the Cosmographer Andrés García de Céspedes

Conocer al autor de una obra nos permite entenderla mejor, por esto nos hemos acercado a Andrés García de Céspedes no sólo a través de los autores que lo han estudiado, sino también de las fuentes directas. Él trabajó en el campo de las ciencias siendo matemático, cosmógrafo y astrónomo; también fue inventor y artífice de instrumentos astronómicos y matemáticos. Además, fue Piloto Mayor de la Casa de la Contratación de Sevilla, Cosmógrafo Mayor del Consejo de Indias, clérigo y supuestamente capitán. A través de los siglos su controvertida personalidad y calidad de sus obras han contrapuesto las opiniones de expertos. Su tenacidad y metodología, que lo llevaron algunas veces a apropiarse de ideas de otros cosmógrafos e inclusive a adjudicarse obras que no eran suyas, le permitieron lograr un reconocimiento en la historia de la navegación.AbstractKnowing the author of a work allows us to understand it better. This is why we have approached Andrés García de Céspedes, not only through the authors who have studied him, but also from the primary sources. He worked intensely in the field of sciences being a mathematician, cosmographer and astronomer. He was also the inventor and architect of astronomical and mathematical instruments. In addition, he was a Major Pilot of the House of Trade of Seville, Major Cosmographer of the Council of Indies, cleric and captain. Over the centuries his controversial personality and the quality of his works have contrasted the opinions of several experts. His tenacity and methodology, which sometimes led him to appropriate the ideas of other cosmographers and even by awarding works that were not his own, allowed him to achieve recognition in the history of navigation.

Navigation: A Very Short Introduction

Navigation: A Very Short Introduction looks at the history of navigation, including the distinctive cultures of early navigation. It shows how the adoption of mathematical methods, use of instruments, writing of textbooks, and publication of charts combined to create a more standardized practice. Methods such as longitude-finding by chronometer and lunar distance were complemented by recording courses and reckoning position ‘by account’. This VSI also introduces the incredible array of instruments relied on by sailors, from astrolabes, sextants, and chronometers, to more modern radio receivers and electronic equipment, highlighting the crucial role played by the endeavour and resourcefulness of mathematicians, scientists, and seamen in finding their way at sea.

From Marco Polo to Cristoforo Colombo and Cipango-America Before 1492

Who discovered America? We have debated this pointless question for 500 years. There was nothing actually to discover, and with good reason Cristoforo Colombo never used the verb “to discover” nor the word “discovery”. Correctly he didn’t speak about the New World, but “otro mundo”, the other world; say the other half of the globe. The Americas existed already, and already had they been populated. Only the unbound European arrogance and the interests involved in such an extraordinary event could mark as discovery what actually no discovery was. On the other hand, even if we want to proceed in the same reasoning, we could never state with certainty who the “first one” had been. We only know the last one: Cristoforo Colombo. With him and his contribution to the history of navigation, the whole world changed, and the modern age began. If the Americas are, nowadays, for better or worse, what we know, this is solely thanks to Cristoforo Colombo.