moisture dynamics
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

392
(FIVE YEARS 105)

H-INDEX

40
(FIVE YEARS 3)

CATENA ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 105987
Author(s):  
Vedran Krevh ◽  
Vilim Filipović ◽  
Lana Filipović ◽  
Valentina Mateković ◽  
Dragutin Petošić ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ryoko Araki ◽  
Flora Branger ◽  
Inge Wiekenkamp ◽  
Hilary McMillan

Soil moisture signatures provide a promising solution to overcome the difficulty of evaluating soil moisture dynamics in hydrologic models. Soil moisture signatures are metrics that quantify the dynamic aspects of soil moisture timeseries and enable process-based model evaluations. To date, soil moisture signatures have been tested only under limited land-use types. In this study, we explore soil moisture signatures’ ability to discriminate different dynamics among contrasting land-uses. We applied a set of nine soil moisture signatures to datasets from six in-situ soil moisture networks worldwide. The dataset covered a range of land-use types, including forested and deforested areas, shallow groundwater areas, wetlands, urban areas, grazed areas, and cropland areas. Our set of signatures characterized soil moisture dynamics at three temporal scales: event, season, and a complete timeseries. Statistical assessment of extracted signatures showed that (1) event-based signatures can distinguish different dynamics for all the land-uses, (2) season-based signatures can distinguish different dynamics for some types of land-uses (deforested vs. forested, urban vs. greenspace, and cropped vs. grazed vs. grassland contrasts), (3) timeseries-based signatures can distinguish different dynamics for some types of land-uses (deforested vs. forested, urban vs. greenspace, shallow vs. deep groundwater, wetland vs. non-wetland, and cropped vs. grazed vs. grassland contrasts). Further, we compared signature-based process interpretations against literature knowledge; event-based and timeseries-based signatures generally matched well with previous process understandings from literature, but season-based signatures did not. This study will be a useful guideline for understanding how catchment-scale soil moisture dynamics in various land-uses can be described using a standardized set of hydrologically relevant metrics.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 12448
Author(s):  
Gabi ZALDEA ◽  
Ancuta NECHITA ◽  
Doina DAMIAN ◽  
Andreea D. GHIUR ◽  
Valeriu V. COTEA

Unfavourable trends have been identified in the evolution of climate factors (temperatures, precipitation, etc.) over the past years, with a direct impact on the vegetative and productive potential of the vine. This calls for a reassessment of climate resources and the adaptation of cultivation technologies to the new conditions. Our paper analyses the climate data recorded between 1991 and 2020 for the Iaşi vineyard ecosystem, which allowed for the calculation of a series of bioclimatic indices and coefficients, deviations from the multiannual average values, soil moisture dynamics, and their influence on development of vegetation phenophases and grape production. The increasing tendency of the average annual temperature and the decreasing amounts of precipitation registered point to a marked warming of the vineyard climate, especially after 2000. The high values of temperatures, corroborated with the soil water deficit, determined an intensification of the atmospheric and pedological drought, a shift in vegetation phenophases, shortened development periods and a forced ripening of grapes, with a negative impact on yields, which fluctuated from one year to another. The analysis of the ecoclimate conditions over the past 30 years has highlighted an alternation of periods, a colder and wetter one between 1991 and 2006, and a warmer and dried one between 2007 and 2020.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vilna Tyystjärvi ◽  
Julia Kemppinen ◽  
Miska Luoto ◽  
Tuula Aalto ◽  
Tiina Markkanen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 108379
Author(s):  
D.M. Barnard ◽  
M.J. Germino ◽  
J.B. Bradford ◽  
R.C. O'Connor ◽  
C.M. Andrews ◽  
...  

Crop Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garett C. Heineck ◽  
Brandon Schlautman ◽  
Eugene Law ◽  
Matthew R. Ryan ◽  
Joseph W. Zimbric ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 2929-2945
Author(s):  
Zhi-xiong Zhou ◽  
Feng-xi Zhou ◽  
Ming-li Zhang ◽  
Bing-bing Lei ◽  
Zhao Ma

CATENA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 206 ◽  
pp. 105505
Author(s):  
Min Luo ◽  
Fanhao Meng ◽  
Chula Sa ◽  
Yongchao Duan ◽  
Yuhai Bao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document