Laboratory Wise Variations in Prothrombin Time - INR - A Cross Sectional Study in Trivandrum, Kerala

BACKGROUND Prothrombin time (PT) is routinely used as a test of coagulation. Thromboplastin is the key ingredient in the reagent for this test. Prothrombin time international normalized ratio (INR) readings can vary according to the thromboplastin used in the reagent. The composition of thromboplastin reagents can influence the sensitivity of each batch of reagents. Various thromboplastin reagents having different international sensitivity index (ISI) values are available now. This study was intended to evaluate the effect of different thromboplastins on INR reading for mitral valve replaced patients under stable oral anticoagulant therapy. METHODS The study was conducted on the citrated plasma received from the mitral valve replaced patients having stable international ratio between 2 to 3 for three months. 62 samples were collected from the clinical pathology laboratory, Govt. Medical College, Trivandrum. Each sample was tested with different thromboplastin reagents having international sensitivity index 1.0, 1.1 and 1.6 by measurement of the prothrombin time and conversion into international normalized ratio. The INR obtained from the thromboplastin with international sensitivity index 1.0 was considered as the standard. INR results obtained from samples tested with thromboplastin reagents with ISI 1.1 and 1.6 were compared with the standard by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett’s post hoc tests. RESULTS Sixty-two samples were tested with the thromboplastin reagent having ISI – 1.0, the mean INR is 2.42, for ISI – 1.1 mean INR value is 2.53 and for ISI 1.6, the mean INR value is 3.19. While comparing the mean value of INR for different reagents using ANOVA, the F value was 14.86, which was significant. P value less than 0.01. In the Dunnett post hoc test, the P value of difference between ISI 1.0/1.6 was < 0.01. Between ISI 1.1/1.6 also the P value is < 0.01. Both of these were significant. The P value of difference between the reagents having ISI 1.0 and 1.1 is 0.838 which denotes no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the thromboplastin reagent with ISI 1.0 or nearest to 1.0 is most desirable for accurate INR report. KEYWORDS Prothrombin Time, International Sensitivity Index, International Normalized Ratio

Assignment of international normalized ratio to frozen and freeze-dried pooled plasmas

ObjectivesFrozen and freeze-dried plasmas may be used for local prothrombin time system calibration, for direct international normalized ratio (INR) determination, and for quality assessment. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of INRs assigned with various types of thromboplastins to frozen and freeze-dried pooled plasmas obtained from patients treated with vitamin K antagonists.MethodsINRs were calculated according to the international sensitivity index (ISI) model using various thromboplastins and instruments, i.e. International Standards for thromboplastin as well as six commercial reagents prepared from rabbit and bovine brain, and recombinant human tissue factor. The uncertainty of the INRs was assessed using the standard deviations of clotting times and ISI values. Commutability of the plasmas was assessed according to the approved Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Guideline EP30-A. Validation of a set of six frozen plasma pools for direct INR determination was performed according to the Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SSC/ISTH) guidelines.ResultsFor all frozen and freeze-dried plasmas, the INRs calculated with bovine thromboplastin Thrombotest were lower than the INRs assigned with other thromboplastins. With a few exceptions, the frozen and freeze-dried pooled plasmas were commutable. When the set of six frozen plasma pools was used for local calibration, the analytical bias of the INR was less than ±10% for all commercial reagents except Thrombotest.ConclusionsProcessing of fresh plasmas to prepare pooled frozen plasmas and freeze-dried plasmas may lead to different INR assignments depending on the thromboplastin used. Despite minor INR differences, a set of six frozen plasma pools could be used for local calibration by direct INR determination.

How to Generate a More Accurate Laboratory-Based International Normalized Ratio: Solutions to Obtaining or Verifying the Mean Normal Prothrombin Time and International Sensitivity Index

Although the landscape of anticoagulation therapy is evolving, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin remain an anticoagulant of choice for many clinicians and their patients. Nevertheless, management of VKA therapy remains challenging, largely because of patient variability and drug and food interactions; thus, VKA dosing has to be personalized. This is achieved by regular monitoring using a test called the prothrombin time (PT), mathematically converted to an international normalized ratio (INR). The INR system is meant to harmonize laboratory test results by taking into account reagent and instrumentation variability that is otherwise expected to give rise to variable PT values, but which should accordingly lead to less variable INR values. Of clinical importance, too low an INR is suggestive of increased thrombotic risk and typically means the VKA dose should be increased, whereas too high an INR is suggestive of increased bleeding risk and typically means the VKA dose should be temporarily withheld and/or decreased. However, evidence continues to show that variability in INR values between laboratories remains unacceptably high. Given that modern instrumentation provides for robust analytical values—meaning highly reproducible intralaboratory clotting times or PTs in this case—the most likely cause of high INR variability is inconsistency in the INR test components—meaning the MNPT (mean normal PT) and ISI (international sensitivity index) values used by laboratories to generate a given INR. In other words, there are doubts as to the accuracy of some INR values because there are corresponding doubts about the accuracy of MNPT and/or ISI values that have been assigned by some laboratories for their reagent/instrument combination. The current report is intended to provide some solutions around the problems of inaccurate INRs, ISIs, and MNPTs, thus aiming to drive laboratory INRs closer to “truth,” and thus promote better patient management. The novel strategies include a primary process of transference to obtain/verify MNPT and/or ISI values for a new reagent using an existing reagent as reference, and a secondary process whereby external quality assessment data can be used to correct bias or existing errors in assigned MNPT and/or ISI values.