Oligometastatic head and neck cancer: Which patients benefit from radical local treatment of all tumour sites?

Background There is a large lack of evidence for optimal treatment in oligometastatic head and neck cancer and it is especially unclear which patients benefit from radical local treatment of all tumour sites. Methods 40 patients with newly diagnosed oligometastatic head and neck cancer received radical local treatment of all tumour sites from 14.02.2008 to 24.08.2018. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Time to occurrence of new distant metastases and local control were evaluated as secondary endpoints as well as prognostic factors in univariate und multivariate Cox’s regression analysis. To investigate the impact of total tumour volume on survival, all tumour sites were segmented on baseline imaging. Results Radical local treatment included radiotherapy in 90% of patients, surgery in 25% and radiofrequency ablation in 3%. Median overall survival from first diagnosis of oligometastatic disease was 23.0 months, 2-year survival was 48%, 3-year survival was 37%, 4-year survival was 24% and 5-year survival was 16%. Median time to occurrence of new distant metastases was 11.6 months with freedom from new metastases showing a tail pattern after 3 years of follow-up (22% at 3, 4- and 5-years post-treatment). In multivariate analysis, better ECOG status, absence of bone and brain metastases and lower total tumour volume were significantly associated with improved survival, whereas the number of metastases and involved organ sites was not. Conclusions Radical local treatment in oligometastatic head and neck cancer shows promising outcomes and needs to be further pursued. Patients with good performance status, absence of brain and bone metastases and low total tumour volume were identified as optimal candidates for radical local treatment in oligometastatic head and neck cancer and should be considered for selection in future prospective trials.

Clinical significance of the cribriform pattern in invasive adenocarcinoma of the lung

PurposeAccording to the WHO, the cribriform pattern is a subtype of acinar (Aci) predominance in invasive adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the lung. Recently, several studies have demonstrated poor prognosis in patients with cribriform predominance. This study was performed to examine the correlations of cribriform pattern with the clinicopathology, molecular features and prognosis in patients with invasive ADC.MethodsHistological subtypes were evaluated in 279 patients who underwent complete resection for invasive ADC. Patients of the Aci-predominant subtype were divided into two subgroups according to the percentage of cribriform cancer (≥5% vs <5%). Clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and molecular changes were compared. In addition, both OS and DFS were compared between patients with cribriform-predominant (n=33) and pure Aci-predominant (n=88) ADCs.ResultsA cribriform pattern was found in 111 (39.8%) cases and ranged from 5 % to 100 % of the total tumour volume (mean±SEM, 30%±2%). Of 117 patients with Aci predominance, 79 showed the cribriform pattern, while the remaining 38 did not. The cribriform pattern was associated with aggressive pathological behaviour, including advanced stages of cancer, nuclear atypia, mitoses, lymph node invasion, metastasis and larger tumour size. The subgroup with cribriform cancer (≥5%) had significantly poorer OS and DFS compared with the cribriform-negative (<5%) group. In addition, Cox multivariate analyses revealed that the cribriform pattern was an independent predictor of OS but not DFS. Moreover, OS was significantly lower in the cribriform-predominant group than in the Aci-predominant group.ConclusionThe cribriform pattern is associated with aggressive pathological behaviour and is an independent poor prognostic indicator in patients with Aci-predominant ADC of the lung.

Predicting Low-Risk Prostate Cancer from Transperineal Saturation Biopsies

Introduction. To assess the performance of five previously described clinicopathological definitions of low-risk prostate cancer (PC).Materials and Methods. Men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinical stage ≤T2, PSA <10 ng/mL, Gleason score <8 PC, diagnosed by transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy were included. The performance of five previously described criteria (i.e., criteria 1–5, criterion 1 stringent (Gleason score 6 + ≤5 mm total max core length PC + ≤3 mm max per core length PC) up to criterion 5 less stringent (Gleason score 6-7 with ≤5% Gleason grade 4) was analysed to assess ability of each to predict insignificant disease in RP specimens (defined as Gleason score ≤6 and total tumour volume <2.5 mL, or Gleason score 7 with ≤5% grade 4 and total tumour volume <0.7 mL).Results. 994 men who underwent RP were included. Criterion 4 (Gleason score 6) performed best with area under the curve of receiver operating characteristics 0.792. At decision curve analysis, criterion 4 was deemed clinically the best performing transperineal saturation biopsy-based definition for low-risk PC.Conclusions. Gleason score 6 disease demonstrated a superior trade-off between sensitivity and specificity for clarifying low-risk PC that can guide treatment and be used as reference test in diagnostic studies.