Peer review declaration

• Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe): Double Blind a. All papers submitted were checked their similarity index using Turnitin. b. Papers have similarity index more than 25% were rejected. c. After that, the format of the papers was checked. Papers that did not follow the IOP template will be sent back to the authors for revision. d. All papers passed the similarity index and have already follow the IOP template will be sent to the reviewers. e. Reviewers reviewed the papers and give comments to the papers. f. Scientific committee decided if the papers: accepted, accepted with major revision, accepted with minor revision, or rejected. g. Author revised their papers and send back their revision h. After that editor will check again using Turnitin to make sure similarity source not more that 5% for each source in each article i. Editor will check again manual to see similarity index and source to make sure all is good • Conference submission management system: All papers from the conference submitted using our system where each author must register first and send article through email [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 256 Submission were received • Number of submissions sent for review: 227 Submission was sent for review, and the rest was rejected because out of scope, low-quality article and high similarity • Number of submissions accepted: 147 Paper accepted based on IOP JPCS Scope and quality • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): (147/227) x 100 = 64.7 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 Times • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 Reviewer Involved+ 5 Editors, each reviewer received 8-10 papers with 2 weeks review process • Any additional info on review process: NONE • Contact person for queries: Robbi Rahim, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Sukma, Medan, Indonesia and University Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia Email: [email protected], Whatsapp+62 8126326393

Multifactor Models for Assessing the Quality of Articles and Publication Activity of Authors

The article describes a new method for assessing the quality of articles and the publication activity of their authors. A distinctive feature of this method is that when it is applied in a complex, indicators that evaluate the quality of the article itself and indicators that evaluate the status of the journal in which this article is published are taken into account. The evaluation method proposed in the article is based on the construction and use of 7 models (evaluation functions) that differ in the number and purpose of their indicators. The models presented in this paper can be used both to evaluate the individual work of a particular author of articles, and to compare the publication activity of several authors for a certain period of time, for example, for a reporting year. Such models can be used, for example, in the process of rating a group of authors (including teachers of the department) for a certain period of time. Visually, the quality of the published article is conveniently assessed using the «Polygon quality article».

Management of the training process of military pilots based on the analysis and assessment of flight parameters from on-board recorders

The main and unchangeable principle of aviation activities is to preserve the conditions for safe flying. In present conditions, in constantly growing tasks, aviation requires organizational and methodological treatments at the highest quality. Article is devoted to the analysis of parametric information accumulated through on-board storage media registration of flight data. The article presents selected examples of methods and tools to analyze data and identify corrective and / or preventive actions, which help to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the entire process of flight training. Conducted in the article discussion and examples highlight the important role of objective flight control as a tool for continuous monitoring of the level of security of performed air tasks in terms of piloting techniques and technical efficiency of the aircraft.

The Quest for Citations: Drivers of Article Impact

Why do some articles become building blocks for future scholars, whereas others remain unnoticed? The authors aim to answer this question by contrasting, synthesizing, and simultaneously testing three scientometric perspectives—universalism, social constructivism, and presentation—on the influence of article and author characteristics on article citations. They study all articles published in a sample of five major journals in marketing from 1990 to 2002 that are central to the discipline. They count the number of citations each of these articles has received and regress this count on an extensive set of characteristics of the article (i.e., article quality, article domain, title length, the use of attention grabbers, and expositional clarity) and the author (i.e., author visibility and author personal promotion). They find that the number of citations an article in the marketing discipline receives depends more on “what is said” (quality and domain) and “who says it” (author visibility and personal promotion) than on “how it is said” (title length, the use of attention grabbers, and expositional clarity). The insights gleaned from this analysis contribute to the marketing literature and are relevant to scientific stakeholders, such as the management of scientific journals and individual academic scholars, as they strive to maximize citations. They are also relevant to marketing practitioners; they inform practitioners on characteristics of the academic journals in marketing and their relevance to decisions they face. Conversely, the insights also raise challenges regarding how to make journals accessible and relevant to marketing practitioners: (1) Authors visible to academics are not necessarily visible to practitioners; (2) the readability of an article may hurt academic credibility and impact, but it may be instrumental in influencing practitioners; and (3) it remains questionable whether articles that academics assess to be of high quality are also managerially relevant.

URBAN LANDSCAPE QUALITY AND FACTORS THAT HAVE INFLUENCE ON LANDSCAPE QUALITY IN LATGALE REGION

The paper deals with urban landscape individualities in the cities and towns of Latgale region. Also show facilities and methods of integrated assessment of urban landscape quality. Article provides information about specifics of urban landscape and factors, that have influence on landscape quality. The paper presents the results of Daugavpils and Rēzekne urban landscape quality complex assessment, that have been realised in 2003- 2005. This results don’t establish significant disparities between quality of urban landscape among Daugavpils and Rēzekne. This method of urban landscape assessment makes possible to get believeable and precise information about landscapes quality.