From Political Mobilization to Political Security. How Has the Approach to Security Changed Over Centuries and Why Has It Depended on Political Relations?

The paper discusses relations between political mobilization, security and political relations. Security is understood as a social phenomenon, clearly explained by Clausewitz in his book On War. According to Clausewitz, political relations are of key significance for understanding the phenomenon of security. This thesis is not challenged, however, it is necessary to explain why political relations are necessary. The paper consists of four parties. The first part explores security and its evolution from a historical perspective. The second part analyses relations between a war and political mobilization. In our opinion, war is something more than simple continuation of politics by other means. Part three discusses the personal security, which was not a priority for the states. The problem of security appeared in its complex form only when people became ready to fight as a result of political mobilization, and with the creation of stable political organization. Section 4 describes political security and its consequences. We conclude that the product of the global political mobilization is polyarchy which principally changes the problem of social and political security. Within the framework of regional polyarchy the system of security of states in the area occupied by it is possible. As a result of creating a global polyarchy the universal system of security has become real. The role of army has changed and to an ever decreasing extent fulfils the function of a traditional army. Mercenaries lost their importance (however, not completely) and later also the military troops acting on behalf of the state.

Time Utilisation Pattern of Front Line Health Workers in India – A Case Study from Mangalore District

Sustainable development goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages reports that most of populations are living healthier than before but there are many suffering from many disease and its prevalence and targets to achieve all them. Health workers are the core of the health care service system to deliver the care to the community. World Health Organization section of Nurse and Midwifery states that they comprised of more than 50% of the total health workforce, and there is a global shortage but the largest need based shortage in the Africa and South East Asia regions (https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/nursing-andmidwifery). WHO statistics consists of Auxiliary nurses midwife (ANM, two years of training), registered nurses and midwifes (it varies from 3 -4 years of education).

Distributive Justice: From Steinhaus, Knaster, and Banach to Elster and Rawls — The Perspective of Sociological Game Theory

This article presents a relatively straightforward theoretical framework about distributive justice with applications. It draws on a few key concepts of Sociological Game Theory (SGT). SGT is presented briefly in section 2. Section 3 provides a spectrum of distributive cases concerning principles of equality, differentiation among recipients according to performance or contribution, status or authority, or need. Two general types of social organization of distributive judgment are distinguished and judgment procedures or algorithms are modeled in each type of social organization. Section 4 discusses briefly the larger moral landscapes of human judgment – how distribution may typically be combined with other value into consideration. The article suggests that Rawls, Elster, and Machado point in this direction. Finally, it is suggested that the SGT framework presented provides a useful point of departure to systematically link it and compare the Warsaw School of Fair Division, Rawls, and Elster, among others.