e23000 Background: ACGME and internal surveys performed at the University of North Carolina (UNC) demonstrate that IM residents have historically been dissatisfied with their inpatient oncology experience. Other institutions have demonstrated that a resident oncology video library is feasible and effective in improving clinical knowledge, but formal protected time for module use limited engagement. We created an oncology video library targeted to the resident learner. To enhance impact, we incorporated dedicated time during elective rotations to access the modules. Methods: We performed a pre-survey using a Likert scale to assess resident knowledge perception of solid tumor cancers. We designed a curriculum based on the ABIM blueprint and those cancers frequently encountered on service. We filmed 21 videos of UNC oncologists discussing content they selected for the resident learner. To improve engagement, we provided a half-day of independent study during their outpatient oncology elective. As this study is ongoing, we plan to conduct a post-survey and post-test to evaluate long-term knowledge acquisition. Results: Twenty-seven of the 85 IM residents completed the pre-survey. Eleven (40.8%) reported feeling extremely or somewhat satisfied with inpatient oncology teaching; the remainder felt neutral (29.6%), somewhat (25.9%) or extremely dissatisfied (3.7%). Among oncologic emergencies, most residents felt comfortable managing hypercalcemia (88.9%) and cord compression (55.6%), but not SVC syndrome (29.6%). Prior to implementation of the videos, most reported little/no knowledge gain from their clinical rotations alone across nearly all 20 domains assessed. The only domain in which a majority (65.39%) reported some or significant knowledge gain was chemotherapy toxicities. These domains were selected as video lecture topics. In the five months since their release, each video has been viewed an average 21.5 times. The most viewed video (39 views) was on traditional chemotherapy pharmacology; the least viewed video (9 views) was on pancreas cancer. 28% of residents surveyed reported utilizing the videos, and for those who did access them, half (56.2%) felt that the time for the videos was sufficient, while the other half (43.8%) wished for more dedicated time. Conclusions: IM residents may benefit from an online video library to improve knowledge acquisition and perception of oncology rotations. However, to maximize impact, residents must be given adequate time separate from their service requirements to access the modules. This is a study in progress, and while initial data regarding video utilization appears promising, we await additional information to ascertain knowledge improvement.