Recent Advances in Marine Biotechnology, Vol. 8
Latest Publications

TOTAL DOCUMENTS

30
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

0
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Published By CRC Press

9780429077357
Latest Documents Most Cited Documents Contributed Authors Related Sources Related Keywords

without the necessity for cultivation of the cells (Rattray et al.1990). The light output is indicative of a metabolically active population of cells, since luciferase enzymes are dependent on cellular activity reserves, or reducing equivalents for bioluminescence. If the cells are growing, the light output is proportional to the number of cells in the sample. However, after long-term incubation in harsh environments, microbial cells often become starved or stressed and the light production from luciferase enzymes declines as a response to the change in cellular energy status (Duncan et al.1994). Therefore, in situbioluminescence is not a reliable indicator of microbial biomass under starvation conditions. The substrate and energy limitations for the luciferase reporter system may be overcome by adding nutrients to the sample in order to activate the microbial population (Meikle et al.1992, Duncan et al.1994). Alternatively, total protein from the environmental sample may be extracted. Then, the energy source can be added directly to the protein extract in vitroand the luciferase enzyme activity can be correlated to the specific luciferase-tagged microbial biomass in the sample (Moller et al.1995).

2003 ◽  
pp. 236-236
Keyword(s):  
Microbial Biomass ◽  
Light Output ◽  
Luciferase Reporter ◽  
Energy Status ◽  
Reporter System ◽  
Active Population ◽  
Light Production ◽  
Luciferase Enzyme ◽  
Starvation Conditions

slowly growing natural populations. Various approaches have been adopted in order to improve the sensitivity. These have included the use of multiple probes labelled with a single fluor (Lee et al. 1993); or labelled with multiple fluors (Trebesius et al. 1994) and enzyme-linked probes or detection systems that allow signal amplification (Lebaron et al. 1997, Schonhuber et al. 1999). The latter indirect approach not only has the potential for signal amplification, but may also be used in natural samples showing high levels of autofluorescence. Any thorough identification method has to include positive and negative controls. False-positive results may either be caused by cells emitting autofluorescence upon excitation or by nonspecific binding of the probe to nontarget cells. Samples should therefore be checked for autofluorescence before hybridization and a negative control with a fluorescent oligonucleotide not complementary to rRNA has to be applied to check for sequence-independent nonspecific binding. Such non-specific binding may be due to interaction of the dye compound of the probe with hydrophobic cell components. Failures to detect cells containing target sequences (false-negatives) may originate from cells with either low cellular ribosome content or limited permeability of the cell periphery for the fluorescent probe (Manz et al. 1992). With the rapidly expanding database of 16S rRNA sequences, the problem of probe specificity has become more apparent and the design of probes is becoming increasingly difficult. These problems are also applicable to PCR and other oligonucleotide-dependent techniques. The problem of probe specificity may be overcome by using multiple specific oligonucleotide probes targeting different sites on the rRNA molecule and labelled with different fluorochromes. While a single oligonucleotide target sequence may be found in a number of related taxa, the probability that target sites for three designed oligonucleotides are found in a nontarget organism is, however, much reduced.

2003 ◽  
pp. 232-232
Keyword(s):  
Signal Amplification ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Natural Populations ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Target Sequence ◽  
Cell Periphery ◽  
Nonspecific Binding ◽  
Detection Systems ◽  
Cell Components ◽  
Negative Controls
Load More ...
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document