Journal of the Polynesian Society
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

151
(FIVE YEARS 41)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Published By The Polynesian Society

0032-4000

2021 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-244
Author(s):  
Lindsay Neill ◽  
Elizabeth Toloke

2021 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-226
Author(s):  
Adrian Young ◽  
Maria Amoamo ◽  
Martin Gibbs ◽  
Alexander Mawyer ◽  
Joshua Nash ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-44
Author(s):  
Tufoua Panapa ◽  
Julie Park ◽  
Judith Littleton ◽  
Anne Chambers ◽  
Keith Chambers

2021 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-90
Author(s):  
Allan Hanson

2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-446
Author(s):  
Lex A.J. Thomson ◽  
Paul A. Geraghty ◽  
William H. Wilson

Kaute and its derivatives koute, ʻoute and ʻaute are Polynesian names for a red-flowered Hibiscus. Since its first botanical collection on Tahiti by Banks and Solander (1769), this hibiscus has been referred to as H. rosa-sinensis L. and assumed to have been introduced by the bearers of the archaeological culture known as Lapita. Lapita people settled West Polynesia around 2800 BP and spoke a language derived from Proto-Oceanic, the common ancestor of almost all the Austronesian languages of Island Melanesia and Micronesia as well as Polynesia. However, whereas Proto-Oceanic names can be reconstructed for many plants found in East Polynesia, the term kaute cannot be attributed to Proto-Oceanic, the name likely being locally derived in East Polynesia from that of paper mulberry (Broussonetia papyrifera (L.) L’Hér. ex Vent.). On the basis of linguistic evidence, we contend that kaute was domesticated in a high island area of Central Eastern Polynesia and then dispersed in relatively recent pre-European times (ca. 500–700 BP) westwards through West Polynesia, to nearby islands such as the Fiji archipelago and Rotuma and to Polynesian Outliers in Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Dissemination occurred before the -au- sequence changed to -ou- and k sporadically changed to ʻ, so that kaute rather than contemporary Marquesan koute and ʻoute was the term that was carried westward from the Marquesas. Kaute is here suggested to be an endemic East Polynesian species, different from H. rosa-sinensis L. Further field and genetic research is needed to definitively determine the phylogenetic relationships of kaute and a taxonomic description is required for formal recognition.


2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-406
Author(s):  
Adrienne L. Kaeppler ◽  
Jo Anne Van Tilburg

The authors examine selected stone objects in the J.L. Young Collection, Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Two were named by Young “Maea Momoa” (ma‘ea momoa; lit. ‘stone for chickens’). One of the ma‘ea momoa is a “pillow stone” (ŋarua) or basaltic beach cobble incised with komari (vulva motifs). The other is a “Bar of stone” lavishly embellished with similar motifs. Six other objects are said to be “fetish stones”. A possible ‘Orongo provenance for the incised “Bar of stone” is raised and tested, and toponymic and linguistic data are offered in support of a new interpretation of the origin of the hakatoro repe ‘elongation of the clitoris’ ritual and the function of one incised “fetish stone” in that process. This research calls attention to the traditional role of women in ‘Orongo ceremonies and employs relatively obscure museum collection objects and their previously overlooked documentation, thus uniting multiple data strands to reveal new details of Rapanui ritual life.


2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-382
Author(s):  
Atholl Anderson ◽  
Fiona Petchey

Whether kūmara ‘sweet potato’ (Ipomoea batatas) arrived in South Polynesia with initial colonisation or later is discussed in the light of recent evidence from East Polynesia and by examination and statistical modelling of radiocarbon ages associated with kūmara arrival and dispersal in New Zealand. Largely unresolved difficulties in radiocarbon dating of horticultural sites preclude reaching a secure conclusion about the relative timing of kūmara introduction, but strong evidence emerges of delayed dispersal southward and inland of kūmara cultivation. In the short New Zealand chronology this may have been more significant than the date of arrival for the role of kūmara cultivation in economic and political change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document