Journal of Science Education and Technology
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1192
(FIVE YEARS 179)

H-INDEX

54
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Published By Springer-Verlag

1573-1839, 1059-0145

Author(s):  
Libby Gerard ◽  
Korah Wiley ◽  
Angela Haydel Debarger ◽  
Sarah Bichler ◽  
Allison Bradford ◽  
...  

AbstractPrompted by the sudden shift to remote instruction in March 2020 brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, teachers explored online resources to support their students learning from home. We report on how twelve teachers identified and creatively leveraged open educational resources (OERs) and practices to facilitate self-directed science learning. Based on interviews and logged data, we illustrate how teachers’ use of OER starkly differed from the typical uses of technology for transmitting information or increasing productivity. These experiences provide insights into ways teachers and professional developers can take advantage of OER to promote self-directed learning when in-person instruction resumes.


Author(s):  
Tom Bielik ◽  
Lynn Stephens ◽  
Cynthia McIntyre ◽  
Daniel Damelin ◽  
Joseph S. Krajcik

Author(s):  
Marina Casanoves de la Hoz ◽  
Anna Solé-Llussà ◽  
Juan Haro ◽  
Niklas Gericke ◽  
Cristina Valls

AbstractThe speed of development of biotechnology within agriculture, industry, and medicine has changed our lives, and we need a biotechnological literacy to understand it. This implies that teachers in primary schools need to be biotechnologically literate in order to educate future generations. The aim of this study was to investigate Swedish pre-service primary school teachers’ knowledge of and attitudes towards biotechnology and contextualize the results by comparing them with a corresponding group of Spanish teachers. Data was collected using the established questionnaire instrument Biotech XXI and analyzed statistically. The findings demonstrate that Swedish pre-service primary school teachers have knowledge gaps relating to the basic genetic concepts that underpin biotechnology, although they are aware of biotechnological applications. Their attitudes are quite positive towards biotechnological applications in health, but less so to buying and using genetically modified products. Higher levels of knowledge were correlated with more positive attitudes, indicating an attitudinal basis for expanding the knowledge of and teaching practices for biotechnology among primary teachers. The level of knowledge and attitudes in the Swedish sample were similar to those of the Spanish teachers, suggesting a similar situation may be prevalent in many countries. The results indicate a need to reconsider the science curricula within pre-service primary school teacher training programs in order to better prepare primary teachers for teaching biotechnological literacy.


Author(s):  
Tom Bielik ◽  
Lynn Stephens ◽  
Cynthia McIntyre ◽  
Daniel Damelin ◽  
Joseph S. Krajcik

AbstractDeveloping and using models to make sense of phenomena or to design solutions to problems is a key science and engineering practice. Classroom use of technology-based tools can promote the development of students’ modelling practice, systems thinking, and causal reasoning by providing opportunities to develop and use models to explore phenomena. In previous work, we presented four aspects of system modelling that emerged during our development and initial testing of an online system modelling tool. In this study, we provide an in-depth examination and detailed evidence of 10th grade students engaging in those four aspects during a classroom enactment of a system modelling unit. We look at the choices students made when constructing their models, whether they described evidence and reasoning for those choices, and whether they described the behavior of their models in connection with model usefulness in explaining and making predictions about the phenomena of interest. We conclude with a set of recommendations for designing curricular materials that leverage digital tools to facilitate the iterative constructing, using, evaluating, and revising of models.


Author(s):  
Natasha Dmoshinskaia ◽  
Hannie Gijlers ◽  
Ton de Jong

AbstractGiving feedback to peers can be a valuable learning experience for a feedback provider. However, different types of products require different types of feedback, which, in turn, may lead to different learning outcomes. The current study investigates the effect on the learning of feedback providers of reviewing different types of products. Secondary school students (n =127) were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions: giving peer feedback on either concept maps or answers to open-ended test questions. Both types of product, created by the researchers, were comparable with regard to content: they included the same misconceptions and were both of average quality. Giving peer feedback was part of a chemistry lesson delivered in an online inquiry learning environment. Students’ post-test scores, their own learning products, and the quality of the provided feedback were analysed to check for an effect on learning. There was no difference in post-test scores between the conditions, but the quality of the provided feedback predicted post-test scores. This indicates that it is not the type of product reviewed that matters, but the effort that students put into giving feedback. Possible implications for practice and further research directions are discussed.


Author(s):  
Luecha Ladachart ◽  
Jaroonpong Cholsin ◽  
Sawanya Kwanpet ◽  
Ratree Teerapanpong ◽  
Alisza Dessi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document