Clinical Update: Evaluation of Low Back Pain

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10, 12
Author(s):  
True Martin ◽  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
Charles N. Brooks

Abstract This article provides an overview of the neurological examination and diagnostic studies commonly used in the evaluation of low back pain, information that is essential for both clinical assessment and impairment rating in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Clinical evaluation begins with a careful review of medical records. After taking a thorough history, the physician performs the physical examination, including neurological testing, on the patient. The clinical evaluation also determines data needed for impairment evaluation. Neurological examination helps distinguish among the various types of pathology suggested by the history, but to some extent the neurological examination lacks sensitivity and specificity and only about two-thirds (69%) of patients with documented L4-L5 or L5-S1 disc herniations demonstrated weakness or deep tendon reflex changes. To maximize information from the evaluation, physicians routinely test for nonorganic physical signs. Isolated positive signs have no clinical or predictive value, and only a score of three or more positive signs is considered clinically significant. Further, these tests were not designed to detect malingering. Used in isolation, the history, neurological examination, and various diagnostic studies do not have the necessary sensitivity and specificity to diagnose and identify the structural pathology responsible for lumbar radiculopathy. Integrating these components into a logical, unbiased evaluation, physicians usually can perform an accurate assessment.

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey C. Wang ◽  
Andrew T. Dailey ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽  
Zoher Ghogawala ◽  
Daniel K. Resnick ◽  
...  

Patients suffering from a lumbar herniated disc will typically present with signs and symptoms consistent with radiculopathy. They may also have low-back pain, however, and the source of this pain is less certain, as it may be from the degenerative process that led to the herniation. The surgical alternative of choice remains a lumbar discectomy, but fusions have been performed for both primary and recurrent disc herniations. In the original guidelines, the inclusion of a fusion for routine discectomies was not recommended. This recommendation continues to be supported by more recent evidence. Based on low-level evidence, the incorporation of a lumbar fusion may be considered an option when a herniation is associated with evidence of spinal instability, chronic low-back pain, and/or severe degenerative changes, or if the patient participates in heavy manual labor. For recurrent disc herniations, there is low-level evidence to support the inclusion of lumbar fusion for patients with evidence of instability or chronic low-back pain.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Xinbo Wu ◽  
Guoxin Fan ◽  
Shisheng He ◽  
Xin Gu ◽  
Yunfeng Yang

Objective. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of two-level percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and foraminoplasty PELD in treating highly migrated lumbar disc herniations. Methods. Patients with highly migrated lumbar disc herniations were enrolled from May 2014 to June 2016. Low back pain and leg pain were evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional outcomes were assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The satisfaction rate of clinical outcomes was assessed according to the modified MacNab criteria. In addition, the intraoperative duration and postoperative complications were also recorded. Results. Forty patients, 14 cases in two-level PELD group and 26 cases in foraminoplasty PELD group, were included. The VAS scores of low back pain (P=0.67) and leg pain (P=0.86), as well as the ODI scores (P=0.87), were comparative between two-level PELD and foraminoplasty PELD groups. The satisfaction rate of clinical outcomes based on the modified MacNab criteria in the two-level PELD group was equivalent to that in foraminoplasty PELD group (92.9% versus 92.3%, P=0.92). In addition, the intraoperative duration of two-level PELD group was longer than that of foraminoplasty PELD group (80.2 ± 6.6 min versus 64.1 ± 7.3 min, P<0.01). The postoperative complications in the two-level PELD group (postoperative dysesthesia: N = 1) were relatively fewer as compared to those in the foraminoplasty PELD group (postoperative dysesthesia: N = 1; recurrence: N = 1; nucleus pulposus residues: N = 1). Conclusions. Both two-level PELD and foraminoplasty PELD are safe and effective surgical procedures for the patients with highly migrated lumbar disc herniations. Moreover, the two-level PELD technique has merits in reducing the incidence of postoperative nucleus pulposus residue.


1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (04) ◽  
pp. 376-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Horenstein

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S89-S90
Author(s):  
Micha Dwornik ◽  
Jolanta Kujawa ◽  
Dariusz Biaoszewski ◽  
Anna Supik ◽  
Wojciech Kiebzak

Author(s):  
Marwah Y. Abdullah ◽  
Reem A. Bana ◽  
Seham O. Aldogil ◽  
Mutlaq A. Alsolami ◽  
Reem A. Alshihri ◽  
...  

Back pain has been reported as a common cause for various patients to present in an emergency or primary care settings. Besides, the management of back pain has been associated with a huge economic burden and remarkably impacts the quality of life of the affected patients. The diagnosis of acute low-back pain can be adequately achieved by conducting proper clinical evaluation and knowing the characteristics of each condition. The present review discusses the clinical evaluation and red flags for diagnosing patients presenting with acute low-back pain. An adequate examination of patients is conducted by obtaining a thorough history and successful physical examination. It should be noted that obtaining an adequate history might not be enough in some cases, and physical examination might not show any diagnostic clues. However, we also reported various red flags for detecting serious conditions, including malignancy, infections, inflammation, and others. These might help establish a further assessment of these patients, including imaging and laboratory studies. Therefore, these cases should be managed as early as possible to enhance the prognosis and intervene against any potential complications. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-76
Author(s):  
Pushpika Attanayake AM ◽  
◽  
Somarathna KIWK ◽  
Vyas GH ◽  
Dash SC

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-14
Author(s):  
Mark N. Malinowski ◽  
Anshuman R. Swain ◽  
Chong H. Kim

The sacroiliac joint, a multiplanar joint located in the dorsal complex of the pelvis, is one of the most important joints in the human to ensure upright and bipedal stability. The joint has been the subject of study for many years, but due to the presence of anatomic variability, challenges remain when analyzing its biomechanics in both normal and pathologic states. The joint is well vascularized and heavily innervated, making it a clinically significant structure with respect to primary, autoimmune, and traumatic disease processes. The chapter describes the gross anatomy of this joint as well as its embryologic origins, variability, and proposed movements as it relates to the joint’s potential for pathogenicity. This information will be useful to clinicians during diagnosis and radiographic evaluation of the patient with low back pain.


2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (S1) ◽  
pp. S239a-S239
Author(s):  
H. Koyuncu ◽  
M.G. Erden ◽  
N. Bozok ◽  
S. Yalgin ◽  
H. Aksoy

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-198
Author(s):  
Shohreh Taghizadeh ◽  
Soraya Pirouzi ◽  
Ladan Hemmati ◽  
Fereshteh Khaledi ◽  
Aref Sadat

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document