The Venetian Blinds

JAMA ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 264 (2) ◽  
pp. 203
Author(s):  
Lee Litvinas
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 205 ◽  
pp. 3993-4000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinbo Wang ◽  
Qianzhou Du ◽  
Chong Zhang ◽  
Xinhua Xu

2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (617) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taito KINOSHITA ◽  
Hiroshi AKASAKA ◽  
Hideyo NIMIYA

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Justyna Kobylarczyk ◽  
Janusz Marchwiński ◽  
Katarzyna Zielonko-Jung

The following article is intended to discuss the issues concerning the introduction of passive measures aimed at improving solar protection in multi-family buildings. A system of classifying these methods into two groups of solutions (architectural and material-building) was applied. The first group includes issues concerning facade design, the spatial features of which (such as loggias, balconies and other overhangs) can be treated as one of the solar protection methods. The authors’ own studies are presented and expressed in a sequence of formulas. The formulas enable assessment of the effectiveness of the above elements, depending on external conditions. As far as the second group is concerned, material-construction solutions for building facades and roofs are discussed. The solutions mentioned include solar-control glazing, spatial shading elements (such as venetian blinds, roller blinds), roof and façade vegetation, and the thermal mass of the building. The essence of the functioning of the analysed solutions in relation to the characteristic functional specificity of multi-family buildings is discussed. Problematic areas of application of the above methods are indicated. As shown in the study, problematic areas may include a group of utilitarian-operating, economic and aesthetic issues, in the case of which the use of passive solutions encounters limitations. In conclusion, the possibilities for alleviating these limitations are highlighted. The authors’ own solutions presented in the following paper can contribute to energy savings and may thus prove beneficial for environmental reasons, thereby serving the aims of sustainable development.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1343 ◽  
pp. 012158
Author(s):  
Yujie Wu ◽  
Jérôme H. Kämpf ◽  
Jean-Louis Scartezzini
Keyword(s):  

Buildings ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Giovannini ◽  
Fabio Favoino ◽  
Valerio Lo Verso ◽  
Anna Pellegrino ◽  
Valentina Serra

A simplified approach to calculate the daylight glare comfort class (imperceptible, perceptible, disturbing, or intolerable glare) on annual basis and for a grid of points in a space is presented. This method relies on the calculation of the vertical illuminance (Ev) for each grid point only, which is compared to an Ev threshold value for each daylight glare comfort class. These Ev threshold values are determined through a comparison with the Daylight Glare Probability (DGP) values on an annual basis through a fault-detection technique, for a reduced number of points. Compared to an annual calculation of exact DGP values on a certain grid, this approach is able to evaluate the daylight glare comfort classes only, but it is less time consuming. The paper presents and critically discusses this simplified method by means of its application to different case-studies: south and west oriented office in Turin (Lat 45.1° N), in which the DGP is assessed for three points in the space, considering glazing with different transmission properties (specular or scattering) and visible transmittances, as well as three operable internal shading systems (one venetian blinds and two roller blinds, for solar or glare control). For the presented case studies, the average error in the classification of the space according to daylight glare comfort classes is below 5% when comparing this simplified approach to related DGP values.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document