scholarly journals Nail Changes of Systemic Amyloidosis After Bone-Marrow Transplantation in a Patient With Multiple Myeloma

2016 ◽  
Vol 152 (12) ◽  
pp. 1395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate E. Oberlin ◽  
Erin X. Wei ◽  
Jeong Hee Cho-Vega ◽  
Antonella Tosti
1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1312-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Gahrton ◽  
S Tura ◽  
P Ljungman ◽  
J Bladé ◽  
L Brandt ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To analyze prognostic factors for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred sixty-two reports of allogeneic matched sibling-donor transplants in multiple myeloma received by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry between 1983 and early 1993 were analyzed for prognostic factors. End points were complete remission, survival, and duration of complete remission. RESULTS Following BMT, 44% of all patients and 60% of assessable patients entered complete remission. The overall actuarial survival rate was 32% at 4 years and 28% at 7 years. The overall relapse-free survival rate of 72 patients who were in complete remission after BMT was 34% at 6 years. Favorable pretransplant prognostic factors for survival were female sex (41% at 4 years), stage I disease at diagnosis (52% at 4 years), one line of previous treatment (42% at 4 years), and being in complete remission before conditioning (64% at 3 years). The subtype immunoglobulin A (IgA) myeloma and a low beta 2-microglobulin level (< 4 g/L) also tended to have a favorable prognostic impact. The most important post-transplant prognostic factor was to enter a complete remission. Grade III to IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was associated with poor survival. CONCLUSION Patients with a low tumor burden who respond to treatment before BMT and are transplanted after first-line therapy have the best prognosis following BMT.


1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 486-490
Author(s):  
A. Heyll ◽  
C. Aul ◽  
V. Runde ◽  
M. Thomas ◽  
W. Schneider

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5146-5146
Author(s):  
Rosane Bittencourt ◽  
Andreia D. Almeida ◽  
Joao R. Friederich ◽  
Flavo Fernande ◽  
Laura Fogliatto ◽  
...  

Abstract In the last two decades, we have seen a radical change in the therapy and prognosis of Multiple Myeloma (MM). Recent research on the role of the bone marrow microenvironment as integrant part of the biology of MM and the possible therapeutic interference at this level are leading to control and regression of the malignant plasma cell clone with a recognized clinical impact. Thalidomide, an old drug thought to interfere on the bone marrow microenvironment, is active not only for the treatment of refractory patients but also, as was recently shown, for induction and/or remission maintenance therapy. Most of the side effects (somnolence, constipation, fatigue, tremor, bradycardia, edema, and neuropathy) can be managed by reducing the dose and most patients need a dose reduction. The appropriate dose of thalidomide in myeloma is unknown. We treated thirty-five patients with MM with low-dose thalidomide (200mg or less). Twenty four patients were on maintenance therapy (13 after bone marrow transplantation, and 11 after chemotherapy with VCAP/VMCP); 5 patients were treated after relapse, 4 with refractory disease and 2 for remission induction as a first line therapy. Patients were treated at the Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Service of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, from march/2001 to December/2003. The response as measured by hemoglobin level, immunoglobulin (M component) or urinary light chain concentration and bone marrow examination was evaluated before, 3, 6, and 12 months after the beginning of thalidomide. Results: All patients are alive and well. Fifty one percent are on 100mg schedule; of the patients on maintenance therapy 90% are on complete remission or on a sustained plateau. A Wilcoxon ranks test for the immunoglobulin level before and after 6 months for the entire group showed p=0.001 (25–75%). Conclusion: Low dose thalidomide is tolerable and effective.


1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Schlossman ◽  
Kenneth C. Anderson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document