scholarly journals Use of Preventive Care Services and Hospitalization Among Medicare Beneficiaries in Accountable Care Organizations That Exited the Shared Savings Program

2022 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e214452
Author(s):  
Yajuan Si ◽  
Nicholas Moloci ◽  
Sitara Murali ◽  
Sarah Krein ◽  
Andy Ryan ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 2451-2459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam D. M. Briggs ◽  
Taressa K. Fraze ◽  
Andrew L. Glick ◽  
Laura B. Beidler ◽  
Stephen M. Shortell ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18308-e18308
Author(s):  
Quoc-Dien Trinh ◽  
Christian Meyer ◽  
Anna Krasnova ◽  
Jesse Sammon ◽  
Stuart R. Lipsitz ◽  
...  

e18308 Background: Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) were established under the Affordable Care Act as a new payment model intended to impose greater responsibility on all stakeholders for cost control and quality improvement. Preventive services are an ideal target to monitor the effectiveness of new health care delivery models. We sought to examine and compare the prevalence of breast cancer screening (BCa-S), and prostate cancer screening (PCa-S) between ACO and traditional Medicare beneficiaries. We hypothesized that the use of BCa-S is higher among beneficiaries attributed to an ACO, whereas the use of PCa-S, a non-recommended test, would be unaffected by ACO assignment. Methods: Using a random 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we assessed BCa-S in women aged < 75, (evidence-based cancer screening), and PCa-S in men < 75 (non-recommended cancer screening) between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013 with appropriate exclusion criteria following the review of guideline recommendations. ACO coverage was ascertained from the quarterly assignment in the Shared Savings Program ACO Beneficiary-level file. Propensity-score weighting was performed to balance out patient and sociodemographic covariates. Results: Following propensity-score weighting, our final cohorts of ACO and traditional Medicare beneficiaries included 52,987 and 526,063 women for BCa-S; 86,936 and 814,221 men for PCa-S, respectively. The prevalence of screening in ACO vs. traditional Medicare were 35.0% vs. 25.2% for BCa-S, and 54.6% vs. 41.7% for PCa-S (all p < 0.001) Conclusions: The ACO model appears to have a salutary effect on preventive service utilization. Our findings vis-à-vis PCa-S among ACOs are likely a reflection of improved health care access rather than vetted screening practices. There is hope that such nonrecommended screening will decrease if more ACOs are required to move towards a “two-sided” risk shared savings and loss model.


2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. S226-S227 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J. Lee ◽  
W.M. Leisenring ◽  
N. Khera ◽  
E.J. Chow ◽  
K.L. Syrjala ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shashank S Sinha ◽  
Nicholas M Moloci ◽  
Andrew M Ryan ◽  
Brahmajee K Nallamothu ◽  
John M Hollingsworth

Objective: Spending for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) episodes varies widely across hospitals, driven primarily by payments made more than 30 days after discharge. Through collective incentives and an emphasis on care coordination, Medicare accountable care organizations (ACOs) may help reduce this variation. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed national Medicare data. Methods: Using a 20% random sample, we identified Medicare beneficiaries admitted for AMI from January 2010 to December 2013. We distinguished admissions to hospitals affiliated with a Medicare ACO from those that were not. We then calculated 90-day, price-standardized, risk-adjusted episode payments made on behalf of beneficiaries, differentiating between early (index admission to 30 days post-discharge) and late payments (31 to 90 days). We also calculated component payments, including those for the index hospitalization, readmissions, physician services, and post-acute care. Finally, we used difference-in-differences estimation to measure the effect of admission to an ACO-affiliated hospital on early and late episode payments. Results: Over the study period, 15,219 beneficiaries were admitted to 299 eventual ACO-affiliated hospitals and 73,910 were admitted to 1,685 never ACO-affiliated hospitals ( p <0.001). While beneficiaries admitted to eventual ACO-affiliated hospitals tended to be younger than those admitted to never ACO-affiliated hospitals (mean age: 79.2 ± 8.6 versus 80.0 ± 8.5, respectively; p =.003), they had similar levels of comorbidity (mean Elixhauser score: 2.7 ± 1.4 versus 2.7 ± 1.4, respectively; p =0.526). Mean 90-day episode payments were greater for ACO-affiliated hospitals [$24,887 versus $23,966; p <0.001]. In the period after ACO implementation (2012 and 2013), total payments for AMI episodes fell by $1259 (Figure; p <0.001). Most of this savings was attributable to decreases in early ($1118) versus late ($141) episode payments. However, none of these savings differed based on admission to an ACO-affiliated hospital ( p =0.363 for the difference). Conclusions: Early Medicare ACOs have not affected 90-day episode payments for AMI admissions. Future studies should explore the possibility of heterogeneity in effect based on ACO structure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document