scholarly journals Development of a New Classification System for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies Based on Clinical Manifestations and Myositis-Specific Autoantibodies

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (12) ◽  
pp. 1528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kubéraka Mariampillai ◽  
Benjamin Granger ◽  
Damien Amelin ◽  
Marguerite Guiguet ◽  
Eric Hachulla ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Jesús Loarce-Martos ◽  
Carmen Larena ◽  
M. Ángeles Blázquez ◽  
Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez ◽  
Patricia Carreira ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1088.1-1089
Author(s):  
C. Preger ◽  
A. Notarnicola ◽  
C. Hellström ◽  
E. Wigren ◽  
C. Cerqueira ◽  
...  

Background:Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are rare chronic inflammatory diseases associated with high mortality and morbidity [1]. One sub-group of IIM, anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS), is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies that target aminoacyl transfer(t) RNA synthetases (aaRS), together with specific clinical manifestations such as myositis, interstitial lung disease (ILD), arthritis, mechanic’s hand, Raynaud’s syndrome and fever [2]. The most common anti-aaRS autoantibody, anti-Jo1 targeting histidyl tRNA synthetase (HisRS), is present in up to 20-30% of patients with IIM, and up to 90% of patients with myositis and ILD [3, 4]. Besides Jo1, there are today seven other identified autoantigens within the aaRS family.Objectives:A large part of patients with IIM, including individuals with clinical manifestations indicating ASS, test seronegative to all known myositis specific autoantibodies. However, these patients could potentially harbor autoantibodies against targets not tested for in clinic. In this study, we aimed at extending the detection of autoantibodies by including all cytoplasmic aaRS in the analysis of patients with IIM. We hypothesized the existence of new potential autoantigens within this protein family.Methods:The presence of anti-aaRS autoantibodies was determined using a multiplex suspension bead array assay on 242 IIM patients from the Karolinska University Hospital myositis cohort. A panel of 186 recombinant constructs, representing 57 proteins that included full-length or partial sequence overlaps between constructs of all cytoplasmic aaRS as well as other myositis related proteins, were coupled to magnetic color-coded beads and each plasma sample was tested against the complete antigen panel.Results:By the use of this multiplex method we identified patients with autoantibodies against many of the tested aaRS. Autoantibodies binding to HisRS have previously been shown to bind with higher reactivity to the WHEP domain of HisRS and this was also confirmed in this study. We confirmed reactivity against three of the other aaRS tested for in the clinic (PL-12, PL-7, and EJ). In addition, we identified patients positive for anti-Zo, -KS and -HA, autoantibodies usually not screened for in routine. Finally, our data indicates that there are autoantibodies binding to other aaRS than the previously known eight autoantigens, which will be presented.Conclusion:In this study, we could detect autoantibodies in plasma from patients with IIM, both against the most common aaRS autoantigens, but also against other aaRS that are usually not tested for in clinic. We conclude that it is important to continue the studies of anti-aaRS autoantibodies, and their correlation to clinical manifestations, and in the long run also include more aaRS autoantigens in clinical practice.References:[1]Dobloug, G.C., et al., Mortality in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: results from a Swedish nationwide population-based cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis, 2018. 77(1): p. 40-47.[2]Barsotti, S. and I.E. Lundberg, Myositis an evolving spectrum of disease. Immunol Med, 2018. 41(2): p. 46-54.[3]Vencovsky, J., H. Alexanderson, and I.E. Lundberg, Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies. Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 2019. 45(4): p. 569-581.[4]Richards, T.J., et al., Characterization and peripheral blood biomarker assessment of anti-Jo-1 antibody-positive interstitial lung disease. Arthritis Rheum, 2009. 60(7): p. 2183-92.Disclosure of Interests:Charlotta Preger: None declared, Antonella Notarnicola: None declared, Cecilia Hellström: None declared, Edvard Wigren: None declared, Catia Cerqueira: None declared, Peter Nilsson: None declared, Ingrid E. Lundberg Grant/research support from: Bristol Meyer Squibb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc and Astra Zeneca, Helena Persson: None declared, Susanne Gräslund: None declared, Per-Johan Jakobsson Shareholder of: Gesynta Pharma, Grant/research support from: Gesynta Pharma, AstraZeneca,


2021 ◽  
pp. 779-784
Author(s):  
Teerin Liewluck ◽  
Margherita Milone

Muscle diseases consist of various disorders that primarily affect skeletal muscle, but they can also affect cardiac or smooth muscle. The disorders may be inherited or acquired. The pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic pathways, and treatment options will vary for each disorder. This chapter reviews common acquired muscle disorders. Inflammatory myopathies are characterized by muscle weakness and inflammatory reaction in muscle, and often, but not always, are accompanied by elevated creatine kinase values. They can occur with infections, systemic inflammatory diseases, or they may be idiopathic. On the basis of clinical, histologic, and immunopathologic criteria, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies can be distinguished as dermatomyositis, polymyositis, or inclusion body myositis. When dermatomyositis or polymyositis occurs in association with a connective tissue disease, the disorder is called overlap syndrome.


2014 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. S70-S71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clarissa Pilkington ◽  
Anna Tjärnlund ◽  
Matteo Bottai ◽  
Lisa G Rider ◽  
Victoria P Werth ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Marie Wilfong ◽  
Todd Bartkowiak ◽  
Katherine N. Vowell ◽  
Camille S. Westlake ◽  
Jonathan M. Irish ◽  
...  

Objectives: The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a clinically heterogeneous group of conditions affecting the skin, muscle, joint, and lung in various combinations. This study aims to investigate the immunologic heterogeneity through detailed immunophenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in IIM patients and healthy controls. Methods: We collected PBMCs from 17 patients with a clinical diagnosis of inflammatory myositis in the inpatient or outpatient setting and performed immunophenotyping using mass cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF) to simultaneously characterize B, T, and myeloid cell subsets. Data were analyzed using a combination of supervised biaxial gating and unsupervised clustering algorithms including t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE), cluster identification, characterization, and regression (CITRUS), and marker enrichment modeling (MEM). Results: We identified two distinct immune signatures amongst IIM patients. In one signature, increased CD19+CXCR4hiCCR7hi cells correlated with increased CD3+CXCR4hiCD38hi (r=0.62, p=0.009) and CD14+CD16-CXCR4+CD38+HLADR- (r=0.61, p=0.01) populations. In the second signature, increased CD19+CD21loCD11c+ cells correlated with an increased CD3+CD4+PD1+ (r=0.60, p=0.01) population. Other shared immunologic features amongst IIM patients compared to healthy controls included decreased surface expression of RP105/CD180 on B cells (median mass intensity 39.9 ± 16.0 v. 60.9 ± 20.1, p=0.002). In the T cell compartment, all circulating CD3+CXCR3+ subsets (2.7 ± 2.4 v. 9.6 ± 8.1% of all PBMCs, p=0.0004) were reduced. Conclusion: Based on circulating B cell phenotype, we identified two distinct immunologic signatures in IIM patients. Future work is needed to determine the significance of these immune signatures for clinical manifestations and treatment responses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document