scholarly journals Applying Lessons Learned From Low-Resource Settings to Prioritize Cancer Care in a Pandemic

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 1429
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. DeBoer ◽  
Temidayo A. Fadelu ◽  
Lawrence N. Shulman ◽  
Katherine Van Loon
Surgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 158 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Elder ◽  
Richard A. Murphy ◽  
Patrick Herard ◽  
Kelly Dilworth ◽  
David Olson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia H. Raney ◽  
Melissa M. Medvedev ◽  
Susanna R. Cohen ◽  
Hilary Spindler ◽  
Rakesh Ghosh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To develop effective and sustainable simulation training programs in low-resource settings, it is critical that facilitators are thoroughly trained in debriefing, a critical component of simulation learning. However, large knowledge gaps exist regarding the best way to train and evaluate debrief facilitators in low-resource settings. Methods Using a mixed methods approach, this study explored the feasibility of evaluating the debriefing skills of nurse mentors in Bihar, India. Videos of obstetric and neonatal post-simulation debriefs were assessed using two known tools: the Center for Advanced Pediatric and Perinatal Education (CAPE) tool and Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH). Video data was used to evaluate interrater reliability and changes in debriefing performance over time. Additionally, twenty semi-structured interviews with nurse mentors explored perceived barriers and enablers of debriefing in Bihar. Results A total of 73 debriefing videos, averaging 18 min each, were analyzed by two raters. The CAPE tool demonstrated higher interrater reliability than the DASH; 13 of 16 CAPE indicators and two of six DASH indicators were judged reliable (ICC > 0.6 or kappa > 0.40). All indicators remained stable or improved over time. The number of ‘instructors questions,’ the amount of ‘trainee responses,’ and the ability to ‘organize the debrief’ improved significantly over time (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p = 0.04). Barriers included fear of making mistakes, time constraints, and technical challenges. Enablers included creating a safe learning environment, using contextually appropriate debriefing strategies, and team building. Overall, nurse mentors believed that debriefing was a vital aspect of simulation-based training. Conclusion Simulation debriefing and evaluation was feasible among nurse mentors in Bihar. Results demonstrated that the CAPE demonstrated higher interrater reliability than the DASH and that nurse mentors were able to maintain or improve their debriefing skills overtime. Further, debriefing was considered to be critical to the success of the simulation training. However, fear of making mistakes and logistical challenges must be addressed to maximize learning. Teamwork, adaptability, and building a safe learning environment enhanced the quality enhanced the quality of simulation-based training, which could ultimately help to improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes in Bihar.


Author(s):  
Felicia Knaul ◽  
Susan Horton ◽  
Pooja Yerramilli ◽  
Hellen Gelband ◽  
Rifat Atun

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 479-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fleur Fritz ◽  
Binyam Tilahun ◽  
Martin Dugas

Abstract Objective Electronic medical record (EMR) systems have the potential of supporting clinical work by providing the right information at the right time to the right people and thus make efficient use of resources. This is especially important in low-resource settings where reliable data are also needed to support public health and local supporting organizations. In this systematic literature review, our objectives are to identify and collect literature about success criteria of EMR implementations in low-resource settings and to summarize them into recommendations. Materials and Methods Our search strategy relied on PubMed queries and manual bibliography reviews. Studies were included if EMR implementations in low-resource settings were described. The extracted success criteria and measurements were summarized into 7 categories: ethical, financial, functionality, organizational, political, technical, and training. Results We collected 381 success criteria with 229 measurements from 47 articles out of 223 articles. Most papers were evaluations or lessons learned from African countries, published from 1999 to 2013. Almost half of the EMR systems served a specific disease area like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The majority of criteria that were reported dealt with the functionality, followed by organizational issues, and technical infrastructures. Sufficient training and skilled personnel were mentioned in roughly 10%. Political, ethical, and financial considerations did not play a predominant role. More evaluations based on reliable frameworks are needed. Conclusions Highly reliable data handling methods, human resources and effective project management, as well as technical architecture and infrastructure are all key factors for successful EMR implementation.


2016 ◽  

Vasectomy is a safe and highly effective family planning method for men and couples who do not want any more children, but in low resource settings, few men seek out or have access to this method. Increasing the voluntary use of vasectomy is a cost-effective strategy for countries to reduce unmet need for family planning, decrease unintended pregnancies, and meet national family planning goals. By engaging men directly in family planning, vasectomy also holds promise for promoting positive gender norms and healthy relationships. | This report is part of a set of resources from FHI 360/Evidence Project providing policymakers, advocates, program managers, and service providers with evidence-based recommendations for improving vasectomy programming.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 57-57
Author(s):  
Matthew F. Bouchonville ◽  
Lucca Cirolia

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to understand how telementoring and training through the ECHO model can build the cancer workforce and bring best practice cancer care to low-resource settings. METHODS The ECHO Institute launched a 5-year project to expand the use of the ECHO model to improve the capacity of local providers to bring cancer prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and survivorship knowledge to rural and underserved populations. The ECHO model leverages technology, telementoring, and case-based learning to connect rural populations to specialty cancer care, improve access to evidence-based therapies and practices, and provide state-of-the-art training and mentorship to build the cancer workforce, particularly in underserved regions. Through the ECHO model, local providers are paired with experts and doctors at National Cancer Institute–designated Comprehensive Cancer Care Centers and academic medical centers for ongoing training, technical assistance, and mentorship. Although originally developed to bring best practice care for hepatitis C to rural communities, the ECHO model is now being used to treat 70 conditions or topics globally. RESULTS Since 2016, the ECHO model has been replicated by 73 partner hubs in 13 countries that are operating 130 cancer programs focused on diverse cancer prevention and treatment topics, including increasing clinical trial enrollment, cancer control and best practices, cervical cancer prevention and treatment, tobacco cessation, and more. To date, 21 peer-reviewed publications have documented the ECHO model’s efficacy in improving the use of best practices in cancer care and expanding access to care in low-resource settings. CONCLUSION Use of the ECHO model to train and mentor local providers is building the cancer workforce and increasing capacity to address critical topics in cancer screening, diagnosis, care, and survivorship. The ECHO Institute is successfully strengthening the cancer health system and accelerating the transmission of best practice cancer care from cancer centers to health care workers in underserved communities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document