Down Syndrome: Antenatal Screening Mathematics, Ethics and Its Implementation in the UK

Author(s):  
Tim M Reynolds
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 100769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anke Hüls ◽  
Alberto C.S. Costa ◽  
Mara Dierssen ◽  
R. Asaad Baksh ◽  
Stefania Bargagna ◽  
...  

Ultrasound ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 220-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie Nisbet

In some countries, measurement of nuchal translucency (NT) is incorporated into national antenatal screening programmes to help detect pregnancies at increased risk of Down syndrome. Accurate measurement of the NT requires a specific technique. This article is an illustrated practical guide outlining the steps required for measuring the NT; it provides useful tips for improving operator technique and advises how to avoid common pitfalls. Although fetal nasal bone assessment does not currently form part of official Down syndrome screening programmes (in Australia or the UK), it is included here as debate about its usefulness continues.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie John ◽  
Maggie Kirk ◽  
Emma Tonkin ◽  
Ian Stuart-Hamilton

Aim To establish whether women's cognitive status influenced their understanding of Down syndrome screening information, and to determine whether midwives offer the same oral explanation of Down syndrome screening to all women or if information was tailored to each woman based on their cognitive status. Methods Midwives (n=16) and women (n=100) were recruited from a regional NHS unit in the UK. A mixed-methods design encompassed two components; audio-recorded antenatal consultations and quantitative surveys to assess women's cognitive status and their understanding of Down syndrome screening information. Findings While women with abstract reasoning skills and high need for cognition (NfC) could understand information sufficiently, women with more concrete skills and low NfC require further explanation from the midwife to reach an informed decision. Conclusion Midwives did not tailor their communication based on women's cognitive status. This has implications for midwifery education programmes to train midwives to communicate Down syndrome screening information effectively.


2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shamini Prathapan ◽  
Jean Adams ◽  
Mary Bythell ◽  
Judith Rankin

Sociology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 957-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J Aspinall

In the UK a ‘Family Origin Questionnaire’ (FOQ) has been introduced as a decision-making tool primarily to identify partners of high risk status in ‘low prevalence’ areas in antenatal screening for haemoglobin variants. A ‘family origins’ laboratory form for Down’s syndrome antenatal screening has followed, with active consideration of Tay Sachs Disease antenatal/ pre-conception carrier screening for Ashkenazi Jewish women. Similar screening developments for the haemoglobinopathies and cystic fibrosis are occurring in other countries. It is timely to ask when and how categories based on family origin concepts should be operationalised and used to assess genetic risk, given the methodological uncertainties and potential risk of offence, essentialisation, discrimination and/or stigmatisation. The potential limitations of these tools are examined, including generic concepts, social sensitivities of language, issues of testing, implementation, and training, and time-limitedness of the categories, to assess where the balance lies between the benefits and disadvantages of such usage.


1994 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
J.C. Forest ◽  
J. Massé ◽  
J.M. Moutquin ◽  
F. Rousseau ◽  
M. Bélanger ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marie-Louise Newell ◽  
Claire Thorne ◽  
Lucy Pembrey ◽  
Angus Nicoll ◽  
David Goldberg ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Doruk Cevdi Katlan ◽  
Atakan Tanacan ◽  
Gokcen Orgul ◽  
Kemal Leblebicioglu ◽  
Mehmet Sinan Beksac

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> To introduce an intelligent prenatal screening system, using triple test variables.</p><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> In this study, we have used a backpropagation learning algorithm (a supervised artificial neural network) to develop an intelligent antenatal screening system (heretofore referred as Hacettepe System). Triple test variables were used as input variables, while “Down syndrome” and “non-Down syndrome” fetuses were the output of the algorithm. Unconjugated estriol (E3), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, and α-feto protein with gestational week and maternal age (triple test) were used as input variables in the training and testing. Multiples of median values of the E3, α-feto protein, and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin were used in this study. <br />The testing group of Hacettepe system consisted of 97 patients who were found to be high-risk (&gt;1/250) during the routine antenatal screening (triple test) and underwent amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping. </p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Amniocentesis was performed in 97 pregnancies with “high-risk” triple test results (&gt;1/250). Fetal karyotyping revealed trisomy 21 in about 9.3% (9/97) of the pregnancies. Our algorithm (Hacettepe System) detected 77.8% (7/9) of Down syndrome cases. Moreover, all of the normal fetal karyotypes were assigned as normal in the Hacettepe System.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> We have developed an intelligent system using the backpropagation learning algorithm (using triple test variables) to predict trisomy 21.</p>


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 656-656
Author(s):  
Sara Ghorashian ◽  
Sujith Samarasinghe ◽  
Amy A Kirkwood ◽  
Rachael Hough ◽  
Clare Rowntree ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Reported outcomes for children with Downs syndrome (DS) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) treated on our previous national study, UKALL 2003, were inferior compared to non-DS children. 5 year event free survival (EFS) for DS children was 65.6% vs. 87.7% for non-DS children and 5 year overall survival (OS) was 70.0% vs. 92.2% (British Journal of Haematology 2014; 165: 552-555). Excess treatment related mortality (TRM, 21.6% vs. 3.3% at 5 years) in children with DS-ALL was primarily due to infection. Similar results have been reported by other study groups. In our successor study, UKALL 2011, we employed several steps of de-escalation for DS-ALL patients compared to standard therapy. Here, we report that de-escalated therapy has resulted in a dramatic reduction in TRM for children with DS-ALL treated in the UK. Methods DS-ALL patients treated on UKALL 2011 had their treatment modified in the following respects: 1)NCI high risk patients did not receive anthracycline in induction unless they had a slow early response at day 15; 2) two years maintenance was given for both boys and girls; 3) no pulses were given in maintenance for MRD low risk patients. In addition, we recommended use of prophylactic antibiotics during induction and intensive phases of treatment. Fisher's exact test was used to compare induction mortality in the DS and non-DS pts. OS was defined as time from registration to death. EFS was defined as time from registration to first event (induction failure, relapse, second malignancy or death from any cause). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival estimation. Results The UKALL 2011 trial opened to recruitment on 26th April 2012 and has recruited 2362 patients, of whom 50 have Down syndrome, in the period up to 22nd February 2018. The study is open in 41 centres in UK and Ireland and included patients with both ALL and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL). The baseline characteristics of the patients recruited up to this date are shown in the table below. For DS-ALL, Day 29 MRD was available for 48 patients and was low risk in 25 cases (50%), risk in 19 (38 %) and no result was obtained in 4 (8 %). The therapy was generally well-tolerated, there have been no cases of therapy curtailment due to toxicity and only one patient due to receive intensified therapy per MRD risk assessment was unable to escalate due to toxicity. At a median follow-up of 32.7 months, there have been 4 events. These include two relapses (relapse rate: 4.1% (1.1-15.5) at 3 years) and two TRMs (one TRM in induction and the other in consolidation; both due to infection). Three year EFS is: 92.9% (95% CI: 79.1 - 97.7) with a three year OS of 95.9% (84.5 - 99.0). The remarkably low induction TRM for DS children on UKALL 2011 (1 death out of 50 patients, 2%), is comparable to that of non-DS children treated on the same protocol with a 3 drug induction (12 out of 1174 children, 1% induction TRM; induction TRM in DS-ALL vs non-DS-ALL p=0.42). It is also comparable to the induction TRM in DS-ALL noted in the latter half of the UKALL 2003 study (1/40, 2.5%) when the aforementioned treatment modifications were first implemented in the UK. Importantly, this TRM is a quarter of that when an historic cohort of DS-ALL children were treated with a 4-drug induction on our previous study (UKALL 2003, DS-ALL TRM 4/46 patients i.e. 8 %, p=0.19). Conclusion These preliminary results suggest that de-escalation of treatment is successful in reducing treatment related mortality for children with DS-ALL without increasing the risk of early relapse, however longer term follow-up is needed. Disclosures Ghorashian: Celgene: Other: travel support; Novartis: Honoraria. Hough:University College London Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust: Employment. Kearns:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Galen: Research Funding. Vora:Jazz: Other: Advisory board; Medac: Other: Advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory board; Amgen: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document