A Comparison Between Estimated Shear Wave Velocity and Elastic Modulus by Empirical Equations and that of Laboratory Measurements at Reservoir Pressure Condition

2021 ◽  
pp. 23-45
Author(s):  
Haleh Azizia ◽  
Hamid Reza Siahkoohi ◽  
Brian Evans ◽  
Nasser Keshavarz Farajkhah ◽  
Ezatollah KazemZadeh
1990 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Yan ◽  
Peter M. Byrne

A method of simulating downhole and crosshole seismic shear-wave tests in a model under controlled stress conditionsis described. The downhole and shear wave in horizontal plane (SH) crosshole shear waves are generated and received along the principal stress axes using piezoceramic bender elements. The K0in situ stress conditions, including loading and unloading stress paths, are simulated by the hydraulic gradient similitude method, which allows high stresses simulating field conditions to be obtained. The horizontal stress during the tests is directly measured by a lateral total-stress transducer. The test data are used to evaluate various published empirical equations that relate shear-wave velocity and soil stress state. It is found that although the various empirical equations can predict the in situ shear-wave velocity profile reasonably well, only the equation that relates the shear-wave velocity to the individual principal stresses in the directions of wave propagation and particle motion can predict the variation of the velocity ratio between the downhole and SH crosshole tests. It was also found that the stress ratio has some effects on the downhole (or shear wave in vertical plane (SV) crosshole) shear-wave velocity, but not on the SH crosshole shear-wave velocity. This indicates that it is only the stress ratio in the plane of wave propagation that is important to the shear-wave velocity. Comparison between the downhole and SH crosshole shows that structure anisotropy is in the order of 10%. In addjtion, K0 values are predicted from shear-wave measurement and compared with measured ones. The difficulties in obtaining K0 values from shear-wave measurement are also discussed. Key words: hydraulic gradient, model tests, downhole and crosshole shear-wave tests, sand.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byung Jae Lee ◽  
Seong-Hoon Kee ◽  
Taekeun Oh ◽  
Yun-Yong Kim

The objectives of this study are to investigate the relationship between static and dynamic elastic moduli determined using shear-wave velocity measurements and to demonstrate the practical potential of the shear-wave velocity method for in situ dynamic modulus evaluation. Three hundred 150 by 300 mm concrete cylinders were prepared from three different mixtures with target compressive strengths of 30, 35, and 40 MPa. Static and dynamic tests were performed at 4, 7, 14, and 28 days to evaluate the compressive strength and the static and dynamic moduli of the cylinders. The results obtained from the shear-wave velocity measurements were compared with dynamic moduli obtained from standard test methods (P-wave velocity measurements according to ASTM C597/C597M-16 and fundamental longitudinal and transverse resonance tests according to ASTM C215-14). The shear-wave velocity measured from cylinders showed excellent repeatability with a coefficient of variation (COV) less than 1%, which is as good as that of the standard test methods. The relationship between the dynamic elastic modulus based on shear-wave velocity and the chord elastic modulus according to ASTM C469/C469M was established. Furthermore, the best-fit line for the shear-wave velocity was also demonstrated to be effective for estimating compressive strength using an empirical relationship between compressive strength and static elastic modulus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document