Parent‐Reported Medication Side‐Effects and Their Impact on Health‐Related Quality of Life in Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Background: VEGFR, KIT, RET, and MET pathways are implicated in several solid tumors. Cabozantinib is an oral inhibitor of these kinase pathways, and hence has found its use in treatment of multiple malignancies. However, it has several side effects that can limit tolerance amongst patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to determine the risk of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) events in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with cabozantinib. Methods: We systematically conducted a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE databases, and meeting abstracts through September 30, 2018. Phase 3 trials that mention HRQOL events like pain, arthralgia, fatigue, and reduced appetite as adverse effects were incorporated in the analysis. Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Random effects model was applied. Results: 4 phase 3 RCTs with a total of 2,703 patients with medullary thyroid cancer, prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma were eligible. Studies comparing cabozantinib (C) vs everolimus, C vs placebo, C vs prednisone were included in the analysis. The relative risks of all-grade side effects were as follows: fatigue, 1.378 (95% CI: 1.236–1.536; P<.0001); asthenia, 1.704 (95% CI: 1.190–2.441; P=.004); reduced appetite, 2.088 (95% CI: 1.471–2.964; P<.0001); back pain, 1.047 (95% CI: 0.871–1.259; P=.626); pain in limbs, 1.444 (95% CI: 1.128–1.847; P=.004); arthralgia, 0.982 (95% CI: 0.707–1.363; P=.912). The RR of high-grade side effects were as follows: fatigue, 1.937 (95% CI: 1.483–2.528; P<.0001); asthenia, 2.211 (95% CI: 1.536–3.184; P<.0001); reduced appetite, 4.329 (95% CI: 2.372–7.900; P<.0001); back pain, 1.227 (95% CI: 0.738–2.040; P=.431); pain in limbs, 2.933 (95% CI: 1.127–7.635; P=.028); arthralgia, 0.820 (95% CI: 0.394–1.709; P=.597). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis showed that cabozantinib contributed to significant toxicity of all grades of fatigue, asthenia, pain in limbs, and reduced appetite. Identifying and addressing these toxicities will be important in improving quality of life for these patients.

Download Full-text

Risk of health-related quality-of-life events and pulmonary toxicities in patients with cancer treated with poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors: A meta-analysis of seven phase III trials.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2018.36.34_suppl.213 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽

pp. 213-213

Author(s):

Sriman Swarup ◽

Anita Sultan ◽

Myo Zaw ◽

Rachana Yendala ◽

Myat M. Han ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Side Effects ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Adenosine Diphosphate ◽

Parp Inhibitors ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Health Related Quality ◽

Related Quality ◽

Health Related

213 Background: Poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) enzymes aide in the repair of DNA damage. PARP inhibitors showed synthetic lethality in cancer cells and were utilized in many solid tumors with notable toxicities. Fatigue and pain are the major determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to determine the risk of HRQOL events and pulmonary toxicities. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE databases and meeting abstracts from inception through June 2018 were queried. Phase III RCTs that mention HRQOL events and pulmonary toxicities as adverse effects were included. Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method was used to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Random effects model was applied. Results: 3188 patients from 7 phase III RCTs with breast, ovarian, and gastric cancer were eligible. Studies compared olaparib or niraparib or rucaparib versus placebo, olaparib vs single agent chemotherapy, iniparib + gemcitabine / carboplatin (GC) versus GC, veliparib + C versus C and olaparib + paclitaxel versus paclitaxel. The RR of all-grade side effects were as follows: fatigue, 1.26 (95% CI: 1.07 – 1.49, P = 0.006); decreased appetite, 1.42 (95% CI: 1.18 – 1.71, P < 0.001); arthralgia, 1.05 (95% CI: 0.83 – 1.34, P = 0.65); headache, 1.35 (95% CI: 0.99 – 1.84, P = 0.05); cough, 1.75 (95% CI: 1.17 – 2.62, P = 0.006); dyspnea, 1.40 (95% CI: 0.90 – 2.18, P = 0.12); and upper respiratory infections, 1.70 (95% CI: 0.97 – 3.00, P = 0.06). The RR of high-grade side effects were as follows: fatigue, 1.94 (95% CI: 1.24 – 3.04, P = 0.004); arthralgia, 1.37 (95% CI: 0.29 – 6.51, P = 0.68); headache, 1.09 (95% CI: 0.47 – 2.55, P = 0.83); and dyspnea, 1.02 (95% CI: 0.44 – 2.36, P = 0.95). Conclusions: The risk of developing all grades of fatigue as well as any-grade cough and decreased appetite was high in PARP inhibitors group, compared to control arm. Recognizing these toxicities and providing good supportive care is vital in enhancing patients’ quality of life.

Download Full-text