Reprogramming Tumor‐Associated Macrophages via ROS‐Mediated Novel Mechanism of Ultra‐Small Cu 2− x Se Nanoparticles to Enhance Anti‐Tumor Immunity

2021 ◽  
pp. 2108971
Author(s):  
Yanhui Zheng ◽  
Yaobao Han ◽  
Tingting Wang ◽  
Hanghang Liu ◽  
Qiao Sun ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yueyun Pan ◽  
Yinda Yu ◽  
Xiaojian Wang ◽  
Ting Zhang

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuankun Zhang ◽  
Qingxiao Song ◽  
Michael Lee ◽  
Haidong Tang ◽  
Kaniel Cassady ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong-Bo Wang ◽  
Ze-Feng Li ◽  
Xiao-Jie Zhang ◽  
Chong-Yuan Sun ◽  
He Fei ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Recently, the mutual effects of tumor cells and the tumor immune microenvironment have been identified as key factors in promoting cancer progression. Sulfatase 2 (SULF2) encodes an extracellular endoglucosamine‑6-sulfatase, which could remodel the highly sulfated domains of heparan sulfate. The abnormal expression of SULF2 is reported to play an important role in the carcinogenesis of many kinds of cancer. However, the prognostic value of SULF2 and its correlation with immune cell infiltration in gastric cancer (GC) remain unclear. Results: SULF2 expression was significantly increased in GC compared with gastric normal tissue, especially in the advanced stage GC. In addition, high SULF2 expression significantly predicted an unfavorable prognosis in GC patients (overall survival P=0.0074), particularly who had metastatic lymph nodes. Besides, pathway analyses of SULF2 in GC revealed SULF2 may take part in extracellular structure organization, cell-cell adhesion and proteoglycans in cancer, etc. Importantly, the expression level of SULF2 was found to be positively correlated with the infiltration levels of tumor associated macrophages (TAMs). Moreover, SULF2 expression in GC positively correlated with expression of several immune cell markers, including monocyte markers, TAMs markers and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), suggesting its role in regulating tumor immunity.Conclusion: This study identified distinct expression and prognostic values of SULF2 in GC using public databases. Significantly, our findings shed light on the role of SULF2 in GC progression and provided an underlying mechanism that SULF2 expression might modulate tumor immunity by regulating the infiltration of TAMs in GC.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samia Q. Khan ◽  
Mohd. H. Faridi ◽  
Shehryar J. Khaliqdina ◽  
Antonio J. Barbosa ◽  
Judith A. Varner ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1440-1440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Daniel Carey ◽  
Courtney Connelly ◽  
Evisa Gjini ◽  
Margaretha GM Roemer ◽  
Edward Stack ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: The programmed cell death-1 ligands (PD-Ls; PD-L1 and PD-L2) act as negative regulators of anti-tumor immunity by binding their cognate receptor, PD-1, on cytotoxic T-cells and inducing T-cell "exhaustion", a phenotype that is reversible with PD-1 blockade. Human antibodies that block PD-1 induce objective clinical responses in the majority of patients with relapsed / refractory classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (CHL). CHLs include small numbers of malignant Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells (~5% of total cellularity) within an extensive but ineffective inflammatory and immune cell infiltrate. Over 85% of CHLs express PD-Ls on both the HRS cells and additional non-malignant cells within the tumor microenvironment (Chen et al., CCR 2010). PD-L expression in HRS cells is attributable, in part, to copy gain of chromosome 9p24.1, a region that includes PD-L1, PD-L2, and JAK2 (Green et al., Blood, 2010). However, the contribution of non-malignant cells to the overall PD-L expression within the tumor micro-environment of CHL is poorly defined. METHODS: We analyzed select CHLs (12 EBV+, 8 EBV-) by multiplex immunofluorescence using formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue sections, with successive labeling by primary antibodies (PD-L1, CD30, CD68, pSTAT3, CD163), followed by secondary amplification and tyramide-conjugated fluorophores. For each case 2 large representative areas of tissue, totaling eight 20x fields of view were selected and imaged using a multispectral imaging platform. Two specific image analysis algorithms were designed to accurately identify CD30+ HRS cells and CD68+ macrophages simultaneously, then to threshold PD-L1 by relative fluorescent units (RFU) in each phenotype. Cartesian coordinates for all cells were exported and distance calculations were generated between PD-L1+ and PD-L1- macrophages and their Ônearest neighborÕ CD30+ PD-L1+ HRS cell. RESULTS: The percentages of CD30+ HRS cells and CD68+ macrophages expressing PD-L1 was highly variable across cases (range 9 - 94%, median 46.6% for HRS cells; range 6 - 91.3%, median 48.2% for macrophages). In all cases the majority of PD-L1 protein within the tumor micro-environment was contributed by macrophages (median 77.9%, range 50.4 - 98.5%), although the mean relative intensity of PD-L1 per cell was higher for HRS cells than for macrophages (3.13 +/-0.02 RFU vs 2.85 +/- 0.01 RFU; p < 0.0001 by Welch t-test). Further analysis revealed that the percentage of HRS cells and macrophages expressing PD-L1 was highly correlated (Pearson r = 0.67; 95% CI 0.32 - 0.85; p=0.001) and, in 18/20 tumors, PD-L1+ macrophages were in greater proximity to PD-L1+ HRS cells than PD-L1- macrophages (across 20 cases mean distance of 32.6 µm (SE 5 µm) versus 51.2 µm (SE 6.8 µm), respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CD68+ tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) express the majority of PD-L1 in CHLs, which contain rare tumor cells. Image analysis of the distribution of PD-L1 in the tumor microenvironment indicates that PD-L1+ TAMs are significantly enriched in proximity to PD-L1+ HRS cells. These data implicate HRS cells in coordinating PD-L1 induction among TAMs to limit anti-tumor immunity. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Shipp: Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Rodig:Perkin Elmer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.


2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Mei Hou ◽  
Xue Mei Qu ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Ting Ting Ding ◽  
Wei Han ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document