scholarly journals A specific microRNA profile as predictive biomarker for systemic treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (20) ◽  
pp. 7558-7571
Author(s):  
Dennis Poel ◽  
Elske C. Gootjes ◽  
Lotte Bakkerus ◽  
Wim Trypsteen ◽  
Henk Dekker ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 2260-2269
Author(s):  
Daniel Tong ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Jeewaka Mendis ◽  
Sharadah Essapen

In the UK, Trifluridine-tipiracil (Lonsurf) is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line setting, after prior exposure to fluoropyrimidine-based regimes. Current data on the real-world use of Lonsurf lack long-term follow-up data. A retrospective evaluation of patients receiving Lonsurf at our Cancer Centre in 2016–2017 was performed, all with a minimum of two-year follow-up. Fifty-six patients were included in the review. The median number of cycles of Lonsurf administered was 3. Median follow-up was 6.0 months, with all patients deceased at the time of analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.2 months, and overall survival (OS) was 5.8 months. The median interval from Lonsurf discontinuation to death was two months, but seven patients received further systemic treatment and median OS gained was 12 months. Lonsurf offered a slightly better PFS but inferior OS to that of the RECOURSE trial, with PFS similar to real-world data previously presented. Interestingly, 12.5% had a PFS > 9 months, and this cohort had primarily left-sided and RAS wild-type disease. A subset received further systemic treatment on Lonsurf discontinuation with good additional OS benefit. Lonsurf may alter the course of disease for a subset of patients, and further treatment on progression can be considered in carefully selected patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 108-108
Author(s):  
Benjamin Adam Weinberg ◽  
Manel Rakez ◽  
Benoist Chibaudel ◽  
Tim Maughan ◽  
Richard Adams ◽  
...  

108 Background: Primary tumor sidedness has emerged as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Tumor bulk has also been postulated to predict response to anti-EGFR therapy. We sought to evaluate the role of tumor bulk as a predictive biomarker to anti-EGFR therapy in pts with left- (LS) and right-sided (RS) mCRC. Methods: Data from 476 pts with mCRC enrolled across 2 first-line trials of anti-EGFR plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy were pooled. Pts were included if there was available information on tumor sidedness and tumor bulk. All were KRAS wild-type and BRAF wild-type or unknown BRAF status. The right colon was defined as the cecum through the transverse colon, and the left colon as the splenic flexure through the rectum. Tumor bulk was the mean tumor size of target lesions at baseline, bulky defined as > 3.5 cm. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models adjusting for performance status (PS), platelet count, primary tumor (PT) resection, number of metastatic sites, and stratified by study. Results: Pts with bulky tumors (211, 44%) had higher PS, white blood cell and platelet counts, higher CEA, fewer sites of metastatic disease, more liver than lung metastases, and fewer had PT resection. OS and PFS medians in months (mos) are presented in the table with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). Bulky tumors had inferior median OS compared with non-bulky (mOS, 17.9 vs. 21.3 mos, HRadj 1.33, 95% CI 1.05-1.69, P = 0.016) although median PFS was similar (mPFS, 8.6 vs. 8.7 mos, HRadj 1.15, 95% CI 0.92-1.42, P = 0.21). Conclusions: Tumor bulk is an independent prognostic factor for OS in KRAS wild-type and BRAF wild-type or unknown BRAF status pts. Pts with non-bulky RS tumors have survival outcomes similar to pts with bulky LS tumors. Although the mPFS for pts with RS tumors treated with anti-EGFR therapy was the lowest across subgroups, this finding was not statistically significant. Further research is warranted into whether pts with bulky RS tumors benefit from anti-EGFR therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT00182715, NCT00640081. [Table: see text]


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 448-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lieke H.J. Simkens ◽  
Miriam Koopman ◽  
Cornelis J.A. Punt

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 573-573
Author(s):  
H. Shimodaira ◽  
H. Soeda ◽  
M. Gamoh ◽  
H. Andoh ◽  
T. Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

573 Background: Activating mutation of the KRAS gene is a predictive biomarker for loss of efficacy to anti-EGFR antibody therapy. However, this was mainly established by the evidences of Caucasian studies. Then, this prospective study investigated the role of KRAS mutations on efficacy and safety to cetuximab plus irinotecan in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: We conducted a prospective study to analyze objective response to cetuximab plus irinotecan in molecularly defined KRAS wild-type (WT) or mutant subgroups of chemotherapy-refractory mCRC. KRAS mutations were detected by direct sequence on DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue of patients treated in 11 centers in Japan. Additional EGFR related genes such as BRAF, PIK3CA etc. and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity related polymorphism in FCγRIIa and RIIIa genes were also examined. Results: Forty-three patients were enrolled. KRAS mutations were found in 31.7% of 41 eligible patients. Response rate (RR) to cetuximab plus irinotecan, the primary endpoint of the study, was 17.9% and 0% for the patients with tumor harboring WT and mutant KRAS, respectively. No significant differences in toxicity were observed between the KRAS WT and mutant groups. Detail statistical analyses are ongoing. Conclusions: We confirmed that KRAS status is a useful predictive maker for the efficacy to cetuximab plus irinotecan therapy in Japanese mCRC patients, even though the response rate in the KRAS WT group was lower than expected. [Table: see text]


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14616-e14616
Author(s):  
Yasushi Tsuji ◽  
Kentaro Yamazaki ◽  
Mari Saito Oba ◽  
Kazuko Sakai ◽  
Michitaka Nagase ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document