scholarly journals Quality of patient‐reported outcomes in oncology clinical trials using immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eoghan Malone ◽  
Reeta Barua ◽  
Nicholas Meti ◽  
Xuan Li ◽  
Rouhi Fazelzad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Oncology Clinical Trials

Cardiotoxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 76-91
Author(s):  
Elisa Agostinetto ◽  
Daniel Eiger ◽  
Matteo Lambertini ◽  
Marcello Ceppi ◽  
Marco Bruzzone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trials

scholarly journals Prevalence of dermatological toxicities in patients with melanoma undergoing immunotherapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255716
Author(s):  
Náthali Felícia Mineiro dos Santos Garrett ◽  
Ana Cristina Carvalho da Costa ◽  
Elaine Barros Ferreira ◽  
Giovanni Damiani ◽  
Paula Elaine Diniz dos Reis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cutaneous Toxicity ◽  
Cutaneous Side Effects ◽  
Final Sample

Background Checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized advanced melanoma care; however, their cutaneous side effects have not been definitively elucidated. Objective To identify the prevalence of cutaneous toxicity in patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy and/or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Materials and methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, which encompassed both clinical trials and observational studies describing the dermatological toxicities in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review under the number CRD42018091915. The searches were performed using the CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, LILACS, LIVIVO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data Results A total of 9,802 articles were identified in the databases. The final sample comprised 39 studies. The evaluated drugs were ipilimumab, tremelimumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab. The results suggest that the most prevalent side effect was grade 1 and 2 pruritus (24%), followed by grade 1 and 2 rash (21%) and grade 1 and 2 vitiligo (10%). Conclusion The most prevalent side effects in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors are pruritus, rash, and vitiligo, and they are rated mostly as grades 1 and 2 adverse events. Remarkably, vitiligo is most commonly found in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.

Living systematic reviews: A novel mechanism for improving efficiency and quality of evidence synthesis in oncology.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 241-241
Author(s):  
Irbaz Bin Riaz ◽  
Rabbia Siddiqi ◽  
Noureen Asghar ◽  
Elizabeth Jane Cathcart-Rake ◽  
Vitaly Herasevich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Principle Investigator

241 Background: In a rapidly moving field, such as cancer immunotherapy, where immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used across 14 different tumor types, patients may receive suboptimal treatment or even be harmed if information on toxicity is not readily translated for use in clinical practice. Every single systematic review and meta-analysis which attempted to summarize toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) quickly became outdated. A living systematic review, which is defined as a systematic review that is continually updated to incorporate relevant new evidence as it becomes available, is necessary in this situation. Methods: The process of creating a living systematic review started with the creation of a comprehensive search designed by a librarian experienced in systematic reviews in collaboration with the study’s principle investigator. Search was constantly updated every 3 months and evidence is synthesized in a series of steps (microtasks) using a combination of human and augmented intelligence. A complete infrastructure is being developed and it includes automated cumulative meta-analysis and an online reporting platform which will constantly update information for clinicians and patients in a live manner. Results: We screened 6746 studies during Sep 2018-March 2019 and identified 6746 studies and we were able to successfully maintain up-to-date toxicity estimates for immune mediated adverse events over this period while maintaining the rigor of a conventional systematic review. Eventually, we will integrate the steps of LSR into one, user-friendly, semi-automated format which can independently provide accurate estimates and feed into and support a living guidelines platform through shared Application Programing Interface (APIs). Conclusions: LSRs are feasible, efficient, and when fully developed can reduce redundancy and waste in medical research, improve the quality of evidence, reduce human effort and support living and dynamic guidelines to facilitate truly informed shared decision making.

scholarly journals Use of a Cancer Registry to Evaluate Patient-Reported Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Heather S. L. Jim ◽  
Sarah L. Eisel ◽  
Aasha I. Hoogland ◽  
Sandra Shaw ◽  
Jennifer C. King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Patient Reported

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used for advanced lung cancer, but few studies have reported on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) outside the context of a clinical trial. The goal of the current study was to assess PROs in participants of a lung cancer registry who had been treated with an ICI. Patients participating in the GO2 Foundation’s Lung Cancer Registry who reported receiving atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab were invited to participate in a survey about their experiences during treatment. Quality of life was evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT-G). Common symptomatic adverse events were evaluated using an item bank generated for ICIs. Internationally, 226 patients (mean age 61, 75% female) participated. Patients reported worse quality of life at the time of assessment than U.S. population and cancer normative samples. The most common moderate to severe adverse events during ICI treatment were fatigue (41%), aching joints (27%), and aching muscles (20%). Due to toxicity, 25% reported a treatment delay, 11% an emergency room visit, and 9% a hospitalization. This study is among the first to our knowledge to report on PROs of ICIs outside the context of a clinical trial. Results suggest higher rates of adverse events than previously reported in clinical trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document