How do different topical treatments compare with each other in people with facial burns?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Burch ◽  
Sera Tort
2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
DOUG BRUNK
Keyword(s):  

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 450
Author(s):  
Magdalena Kocot-Kępska ◽  
Renata Zajączkowska ◽  
Joanna Mika ◽  
David J. Kopsky ◽  
Jerzy Wordliczek ◽  
...  

Neuropathic pain in humans results from an injury or disease of the somatosensory nervous system at the peripheral or central level. Despite the considerable progress in pain management methods made to date, peripheral neuropathic pain significantly impacts patients’ quality of life, as pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods often fail or induce side effects. Topical treatments are gaining popularity in the management of peripheral neuropathic pain, due to excellent safety profiles and preferences. Moreover, topical treatments applied locally may target the underlying mechanisms of peripheral sensitization and pain. Recent studies showed that peripheral sensitization results from interactions between neuronal and non-neuronal cells, with numerous signaling molecules and molecular/cellular targets involved. This narrative review discusses the molecular/cellular mechanisms of drugs available in topical formulations utilized in clinical practice and their effectiveness in clinical studies in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. We searched PubMed for papers published from 1 January 1995 to 30 November 2020. The key search phrases for identifying potentially relevant articles were “topical AND pain”, “topical AND neuropathic”, “topical AND treatment”, “topical AND mechanism”, “peripheral neuropathic”, and “mechanism”. The result of our search was 23 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 9 open-label studies, 16 retrospective studies, 20 case (series) reports, 8 systematic reviews, 66 narrative reviews, and 140 experimental studies. The data from preclinical studies revealed that active compounds of topical treatments exert multiple mechanisms of action, directly or indirectly modulating ion channels, receptors, proteins, and enzymes expressed by neuronal and non-neuronal cells, and thus contributing to antinociception. However, which mechanisms and the extent to which the mechanisms contribute to pain relief observed in humans remain unclear. The evidence from RCTs and reviews supports 5% lidocaine patches, 8% capsaicin patches, and botulinum toxin A injections as effective treatments in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. In turn, single RCTs support evidence of doxepin, funapide, diclofenac, baclofen, clonidine, loperamide, and cannabidiol in neuropathic pain states. Topical administration of phenytoin, ambroxol, and prazosin is supported by observational clinical studies. For topical amitriptyline, menthol, and gabapentin, evidence comes from case reports and case series. For topical ketamine and baclofen, data supporting their effectiveness are provided by both single RCTs and case series. The discussed data from clinical studies and observations support the usefulness of topical treatments in neuropathic pain management. This review may help clinicians in making decisions regarding whether and which topical treatment may be a beneficial option, particularly in frail patients not tolerating systemic pharmacotherapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S176-S177
Author(s):  
Alexa Barwick ◽  
Dana Y Nakamura ◽  
James H Holmes ◽  
Joseph Molnar

Abstract Introduction Facial burns can be complicated by the development of scar tissue and contractures, resulting in decreased flexibility of the tissue involved in swallowing, facial expression, and verbal communication. Maximizing functional range of motion is an important preventative measure for improving functional outcomes for swallowing, communication, and for the prevention of microstomia. A range of therapy interventions including stretching, massage, compression, and use of appliances has been reported in the literature; however, there is limited to no information on current practice patterns amongst North American providers (MD, DO, PA, NP, etc.) or therapists (PT, OT, and SLP). Methods A RedCap survey was developed by a Speech-Language Pathologist and Occupational Therapist involved in burn care. The survey consisted of 18 total questions, with participants responding to between 12–13 questions due to branching logic. Questions were related to demographic and service provision related to facial massage and stretching. Survey questions were multiple choice, multiple answer multiple choice, or contained text boxes. The survey was distributed to Providers and Therapists from the United Stated of America and Canada who were members of the American Burn Association (ABA). Results A total of 69 surveys were collected, with 57 surveys meeting criteria for inclusion. Respondents consisted of therapists 68%, providers 23%, and other health professionals 9%. Forty-six ABA burn centers from across the United States and Canada were represented. The majority of respondents had over 10 years of experience working with burn patients. 91% of respondents reported that facial massage and stretching was used as a tool at their facility. Respondents, who report facial massage is utilized at their facility, report OT as being the primary discipline responsible for assessing (67%) and completing (65%) facial massage, with 85% reporting additional discipline(s) also participating in facial massage. 9% of respondents report that facial massage and stretching is not utilized at their facility following facial burns. Of those who responded that facial massage and stretching is not utilized following facial burns, 40% felt this would be beneficial to patients, while 60% were unsure. Conclusions Facial scar management is an important part of burn care, with the majority of respondents reporting completion of facial massage and stretching as part of the services provided to patients who have suffered facial burns. OTs are the primary service providers for facial massage and stretching post facial burn. Practices for facial massage varies greatly, with the majority of respondents reporting no specific protocol for facial massage and stretching is followed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-431
Author(s):  
Heather L. Tier ◽  
Esther A. Balogh ◽  
Arjun M. Bashyam ◽  
Alan B. Fleischer ◽  
Jonathan M. Spergel ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Qiang Chng ◽  
Miny Samuel ◽  
Khimara Naidoo ◽  
Huma Jaffar ◽  
Ing Wei Khor ◽  
...  

1980 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazimierz Kobus
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Peppin ◽  
Phillip J. Albrecht ◽  
Charles Argoff ◽  
Burkhard Gustorff ◽  
Marco Pappagallo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document