Ventricular standstill complicating left heart catheterization in the presence of uncomplicated right bundle branch block

1992 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh D. Gaglani ◽  
Ashfaq A. Turk ◽  
Mandeep R. Mehra ◽  
Ralph D. Lach
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Swapnil Garg ◽  
Muhammad Soofi ◽  
Ronald Markert ◽  
Ajay Agarwal

Background: The prognostic importance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) has been debated. It has been described as a benign variant, especially when compared to left bundle branch block (LBBB). We studied the presence of bundle branch blocks in a high-risk U.S. Veteran cohort. Methods: Retrospective electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis for presence of RBBB or LBBB was conducted in 1,535 consecutive patients presenting for left heart catheterization. Evaluated risk factors were gender, age, BMI, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking history, chronic kidney disease, reduced ejection fraction and history of previous revascularization. Mean follow up time was 112 ± 66 months. Results: Analysis of 1,535 ECGs revealed 113 patients with RBBB and 65 patients with LBBB. Risk factor burden between the two groups appeared similar with exception of higher incidence of reduced ejection fraction and previous revascularization in the LBBB group. Mortality of RBBB group was 92.0% compared to 96.9% of LBBB group. Mean time to death for RBBB group was 74.1 months compared to 61.0 months for LBBB group. Hazard ratio (HR) for RBBB with Cox regression controlling for aforementioned risk factors was 1.41, 95% CI = 1.14-1.74; p =.002. HR for LBBB controlling for the same risk factors was 1.84, 95% CI = 1.42-2.40; p =<.001. Conclusion: In a high-risk cohort of US Veterans, both LBBB and RBBB are independent risk factors for mortality. While LBBB is a known adverse risk factor, presence of RBBB portends a poor prognosis and warrants further research.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H T Ozer ◽  
O Ozer ◽  
C Coteli ◽  
A Kivrak ◽  
M L Sahiner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Diastolic dysfunction is an important factor in the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). As the ejection fraction is preserved in HFpEF, the diagnosis of this disease with non-invasive methods is difficult. Purpose In this study, the relationship of BNP, NT-proBNP, Ghrelin, and echocardiographic 3D strain findings with diastolic dysfunction was investigated in patients undergoing left heart catheterization. Methods Our study is a cross-sectional study and included 78 patients in whom echocardiography was performed, and who underwent left heart catheterization based on relevant indications. The patient data recorded for evaluation included the findings from left heart catheterization, follow-up 3D echocardiography; and the levels of blood NT-proBNP, and Ghrelin. Results The rate of diastolic dysfunction was 42.3%. Longitudinal 2D and 3D mean strain as absolute values were observed to decrease more in patients with diastolic dysfunction. The median levels of BNP, NT-proBNP, and Ghrelin levels were higher in patients with diastolic dysfunction. The independent predictors of diastolic dysfunction were determined to be the left atrial volume index (LAVI) (OR=1.17; p=0.018), longitudinal 3D strain values (OR=1.88; p<0.001), NT-proBNP (OR=1.11; p=0.001), and Ghrelin (OR=1.40; p=0.001), respectively. Relationship Between LV EDP and LV Longitudinal Strain LV EDP 2D Strain 3D Strain r p r p r p BNP, pg/ml 0.429 <0.001* 0.115 0.316 0.178 0.118 NT-proBNP, pg/ml 0.484 <0.001* 0.155 0.177 0.186 0.104 Ghrelin, pg/ml 0.478 <0.001* 0.086 0.455 0.157 0.169 SolV DB – – 0.481 <0.001* 0.591 <0.001* dP/dT −0.389 <0.001* −0.283 0.012* −0.307 0.006* Negative dP/dT −0.747 <0.001* −0.337 0.003* −0.458 <0.001* 2D. % 0.481 <0.001* – – 0.852 <0.001* 3D. % 0.591 <0.001* 0.852 <0.001* – – If p value is less than 0.05 shows statistical significance. Measurement of longitudinal strain Conclusion In conclusion, our study found out that the reduced 3D strain absolute values and increased levels of NT-proBNP and Ghrelin biomarkers predicted diastolic dysfunction. If further large-scale studies prove the efficiency of these practical, they may not only allow for making a diagnosis of HFpEF more readily but may also eliminate the confusion in diagnostic algorithms. Acknowledgement/Funding None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document