scholarly journals Mapping Functional Interaction Sites of Human Prune C-Terminal Domain by NMR Spectroscopy in Human Cell Lysates

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (37) ◽  
pp. 12217-12220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donatella Diana ◽  
Giovanni Smaldone ◽  
Pasquale De Antonellis ◽  
Luciano Pirone ◽  
MariaNeve Carotenuto ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 145 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Ohrtman ◽  
Christin F. Romberg ◽  
Ong Moua ◽  
Roger A. Bannister ◽  
S. Rock Levinson ◽  
...  

CaV1.1 acts as both the voltage sensor that triggers excitation–contraction coupling in skeletal muscle and as an L-type Ca2+ channel. It has been proposed that, after its posttranslational cleavage, the distal C terminus of CaV1.1 remains noncovalently associated with proximal CaV1.1, and that tethering of protein kinase A to the distal C terminus is required for depolarization-induced potentiation of L-type Ca2+ current in skeletal muscle. Here, we report that association of the distal C terminus with proximal CaV1.1 cannot be detected by either immunoprecipitation of mouse skeletal muscle or by colocalized fluorescence after expression in adult skeletal muscle fibers of a CaV1.1 construct labeled with yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) and cyan fluorescent protein on the N and C termini, respectively. We found that L-type Ca2+ channel activity was similar after expression of constructs that either did (YFP-CaV1.11860) or did not (YFP-CaV1.11666) contain coding sequence for the distal C-terminal domain in dysgenic myotubes null for endogenous CaV1.1. Furthermore, in response to strong (up to 90 mV) or long-lasting prepulses (up to 200 ms), tail current amplitudes and decay times were equally increased in dysgenic myotubes expressing either YFP-CaV1.11860 or YFP-CaV1.11666, suggesting that the distal C-terminal domain was not required for depolarization-induced potentiation. Thus, our experiments do not support the existence of either biochemical or functional interactions between proximal CaV1.1 and the distal C terminus.


Author(s):  
Susanne Zweerink ◽  
Tanja Pollmann ◽  
Sabrina Ninck ◽  
Farnusch Kaschani ◽  
Markus Kaiser

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (50) ◽  
pp. 22609-22612
Author(s):  
Rui Huang ◽  
Zev A. Ripstein ◽  
John L. Rubinstein ◽  
Lewis E. Kay

1997 ◽  
Vol 231 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline S. Miles ◽  
Johan Weigelt ◽  
N.Patrick J. Stamford ◽  
Nada Dammerova ◽  
Gottfried Otting ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 370 (4) ◽  
pp. 643-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Despoina A.I. Mavridou ◽  
Julie M. Stevens ◽  
Stuart J. Ferguson ◽  
Christina Redfield

1998 ◽  
Vol 180 (21) ◽  
pp. 5580-5590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. A. Mathews ◽  
Hua Lucy Tang ◽  
David F. Blair

ABSTRACT The FliM protein of Escherichia coli is required for the assembly and function of flagella. Genetic analyses and binding studies have shown that FliM interacts with several other flagellar proteins, including FliN, FliG, phosphorylated CheY, other copies of FliM, and possibly MotA and FliF. Here, we examine the effects of a set of linker insertions and partial deletions in FliM on its binding to FliN, FliG, CheY, and phospho-CheY and on its functions in flagellar assembly and rotation. The results suggest that FliM is organized into multiple domains. A C-terminal domain of about 90 residues binds to FliN in coprecipitation experiments, is most stable when coexpressed with FliN, and has some sequence similarity to FliN. This C-terminal domain is joined to the rest of FliM by a segment (residues 237 to 247) that is poorly conserved, tolerates linker insertion, and may be an interdomain linker. Binding to FliG occurs through multiple segments of FliM, some in the C-terminal domain and others in an N-terminal domain of 144 residues. Binding of FliM to CheY and phospho-CheY was complex. In coprecipitation experiments using purified FliM, the protein bound weakly to unphosphorylated CheY and more strongly to phospho-CheY, in agreement with previous reports. By contrast, in experiments using FliM in fresh cell lysates, the protein bound to unphosphorylated CheY about as well as to phospho-CheY. Determinants for binding CheY occur both near the N terminus of FliM, which appears most important for binding to the phosphorylated protein, and in the C-terminal domain, which binds more strongly to unphosphorylated CheY. Several different deletions and linker insertions in FliM enhanced its binding to phospho-CheY in coprecipitation experiments with protein from cell lysates. This suggests that determinants for binding phospho-CheY may be partly masked in the FliM protein as it exists in the cytoplasm. A model is proposed for the arrangement and function of FliM domains in the flagellar motor.


FEBS Letters ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 581 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Duk Seo ◽  
Sung Jean Park ◽  
Hyun-Jung Kim ◽  
Bong Jin Lee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document